Suppr超能文献

健康问题的答案:互联网搜索结果与在线健康社区的回复

Answers to Health Questions: Internet Search Results Versus Online Health Community Responses.

作者信息

Kanthawala Shaheen, Vermeesch Amber, Given Barbara, Huh Jina

机构信息

Department of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 28;18(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5369.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

About 6 million people search for health information on the Internet each day in the United States. Both patients and caregivers search for information about prescribed courses of treatments, unanswered questions after a visit to their providers, or diet and exercise regimens. Past literature has indicated potential challenges around quality in health information available on the Internet. However, diverse information exists on the Internet-ranging from government-initiated webpages to personal blog pages. Yet we do not fully understand the strengths and weaknesses of different types of information available on the Internet.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this research was to investigate the strengths and challenges of various types of health information available online and to suggest what information sources best fit various question types.

METHODS

We collected questions posted to and the responses they received from an online diabetes community and classified them according to Rothwell's classification of question types (fact, policy, or value questions). We selected 60 questions (20 each of fact, policy, and value) and the replies the questions received from the community. We then searched for responses to the same questions using a search engine and recorded the

RESULTS

Community responses answered more questions than did search results overall. Search results were most effective in answering value questions and least effective in answering policy questions. Community responses answered questions across question types at an equivalent rate, but most answered policy questions and the least answered fact questions. Value questions were most answered by community responses, but some of these answers provided by the community were incorrect. Fact question search results were the most clinically valid.

CONCLUSIONS

The Internet is a prevalent source of health information for people. The information quality people encounter online can have a large impact on them. We present what kinds of questions people ask online and the advantages and disadvantages of various information sources in getting answers to those questions. This study contributes to addressing people's online health information needs.

摘要

背景

在美国,每天约有600万人在互联网上搜索健康信息。患者和护理人员都会搜索有关规定治疗方案的信息、就诊后未解决的问题,或饮食和锻炼方案。过去的文献表明,互联网上的健康信息在质量方面存在潜在挑战。然而,互联网上存在各种各样的信息,从政府发起的网页到个人博客页面。但我们尚未完全了解互联网上不同类型信息的优缺点。

目的

本研究的目的是调查在线提供的各类健康信息的优势和挑战,并指出哪种信息来源最适合各类问题。

方法

我们收集了在线糖尿病社区发布的问题及其收到的回复,并根据罗斯韦尔的问题类型分类(事实、政策或价值问题)进行分类。我们选择了60个问题(事实、政策和价值问题各20个)以及这些问题从社区收到的回复。然后,我们使用搜索引擎搜索相同问题的答案并记录下来。

结果

总体而言,社区回复回答的问题比搜索结果更多。搜索结果在回答价值问题方面最有效,而在回答政策问题方面最无效。社区回复以相同的比例回答各类问题,但回答政策问题的最多,回答事实问题的最少。价值问题大多由社区回复回答,但社区提供的一些答案是错误的。事实问题的搜索结果在临床上最有效。

结论

互联网是人们获取健康信息的普遍来源。人们在网上遇到的信息质量可能会对他们产生很大影响。我们展示了人们在网上提出的问题类型,以及各种信息来源在回答这些问题方面的优缺点。这项研究有助于满足人们的在线健康信息需求。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Text classification for assisting moderators in online health communities.在线健康社区中帮助版主进行文本分类。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Dec;46(6):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
8
Digital social networks and health.数字社交网络与健康。
Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1829-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000897.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验