Tran Cuc H, Brew Joe, Johnson Nicholas, Ryan Kathleen A, Martin Brittany, Cornett Catherine, Caron Brad, Duncan R Paul, Small Parker A, Myers Paul D, Morris J Glenn
College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Florida Department of Health in Alachua County, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Vaccine. 2016 May 23;34(24):2737-44. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
School-located influenza vaccination (SLIV) programs are a promising strategy for increasing vaccination coverage among schoolchildren. However, questions of economic sustainability have dampened enthusiasm for this approach in the United States. We evaluated SLIV sustainability of a health department led, county-wide SLIV program in Alachua County, Florida. Based on Alachua's outcome data, we modeled the sustainability of SLIV programs statewide using two different implementation costs and at different vaccination rates, reimbursement amount, and Vaccines for Children (VFC) coverage.
Mass vaccination clinics were conducted at 69 Alachua County schools in 2013 using VFC (for Medicaid and uninsured children) and non-VFC vaccines. Claims were processed after each clinic and submitted to insurance providers for reimbursement ($5 Medicaid and $47.04 from private insurers). We collected programmatic expenditures and volunteer hours to calculate fixed and variable costs for two different implementation costs (with or without in-kind costs included). We project program sustainability for Florida using publicly available county-specific student populations and health insurance enrollment data.
Approximately 42% (n=12,853) of pre-kindergarten - 12th grade students participated in the SLIV program in Alachua. Of the 13,815 doses provided, 58% (8042) were non-VFC vaccine. Total implementation cost was $14.95/dose or $7.93/dose if "in-kind" costs were not included. The program generated a net surplus of $24,221, despite losing $4.68 on every VFC dose provided to Medicaid and uninsured children. With volunteers, 99% of Florida counties would be sustainable at a 50% vaccination rate and average reimbursement amount of $3.25 VFC and $37 non-VFC. Without volunteers, 69% of counties would be sustainable at 50% vaccination rate if all VFC recipients were on Medicaid and its reimbursement increased from $5 to $10 (amount private practices receive).
Key factors that contributed to the sustainability and success of an SLIV program are: targeting privately insured children and reducing administration cost through volunteers. Counties with a high proportion of VFC eligible children may not be sustainable without subsidies at $5 Medicaid reimbursement.
学校流感疫苗接种(SLIV)计划是提高学童疫苗接种覆盖率的一项有前景的策略。然而,经济可持续性问题削弱了美国对该方法的热情。我们评估了佛罗里达州阿拉楚阿县由卫生部门主导的全县范围内的SLIV计划的可持续性。基于阿拉楚阿的结果数据,我们使用两种不同的实施成本以及不同的疫苗接种率、报销金额和儿童疫苗计划(VFC)覆盖率,对全州范围内的SLIV计划的可持续性进行了建模。
2013年在阿拉楚阿县的69所学校开展了大规模疫苗接种诊所,使用VFC(用于医疗补助和未参保儿童)和非VFC疫苗。每次诊所以后处理索赔,并提交给保险提供商进行报销(医疗补助报销5美元,私人保险公司报销47.04美元)。我们收集了计划支出和志愿者工时,以计算两种不同实施成本(包括或不包括实物成本)的固定成本和可变成本。我们使用公开可用的特定县学生人口和健康保险登记数据预测佛罗里达州的计划可持续性。
阿拉楚阿县幼儿园前至12年级的学生中约42%(n = 12,853)参加了SLIV计划。在提供的13,815剂疫苗中,58%(8042剂)是非VFC疫苗。如果不包括“实物”成本,总实施成本为每剂14.95美元或每剂7.93美元。尽管向医疗补助和未参保儿童提供的每剂VFC疫苗亏损4.68美元,但该计划仍产生了24,221美元的净盈余。有志愿者参与的情况下,如果疫苗接种率为50%,VFC平均报销金额为3.25美元,非VFC为37美元,佛罗里达州99%的县将实现可持续性。没有志愿者参与的情况下,如果所有VFC受种者都参加医疗补助且其报销金额从5美元提高到10美元(私人诊所获得的金额),69%的县在50%的疫苗接种率下将实现可持续性。
促成SLIV计划可持续性和成功的关键因素是:针对有私人保险的儿童,并通过志愿者降低管理成本。如果医疗补助报销金额为5美元且没有补贴,VFC合格儿童比例高的县可能无法实现可持续性。