Srivastav Anup, Zhai Yusheng, Santibanez Tammy A, Kahn Katherine E, Smith Philip J, Singleton James A
Leidos Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Leidos Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vaccine. 2015 Jun 17;33(27):3114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.098. Epub 2015 May 12.
The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program provides vaccines at no cost to children who are Medicaid-eligible, uninsured, American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN), or underinsured and vaccinated at Federally Qualified Health Centers or Rural Health Clinics. The objective of this study was to compare influenza vaccination coverage of VFC-entitled to privately insured children in the United States, nationally, by state, and by selected socio-demographic variables.
Data from the National Immunization Survey-Flu (NIS-Flu) surveys were analyzed for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 influenza seasons for households with children 6 months-17 years. VFC-entitlement and private insurance status were defined based upon questions asked of the parent during the telephone interview. Influenza vaccination coverage estimates of children VFC-entitled versus privately insured were compared by t-tests, both nationally and within state, and within selected socio-demographic variables.
For both seasons studied, influenza coverage for VFC-entitled children did not significantly differ from coverage for privately insured children (2011-2012: 52.0%±1.9% versus 50.7%±1.2%; 2012-2013: 56.0%±1.6% versus 57.2%±1.2%). Among VFC-entitled children, uninsured children had lower coverage (2011-2012: 38.9%±4.7%; 2012-2013: 44.8%±3.5%) than Medicaid-eligible (2011-2012: 55.2%±2.1%; 2012-2013: 58.6%±1.9%) and AI/AN children (2011-2012: 54.4%±11.3%; 2012-2013: 54.6%±7.0%). Significant differences in vaccination coverage among VFC-entitled and privately insured children were observed within some subgroups of race/ethnicity, income, age, region, and living in a metropolitan statistical area principle city.
Although finding few differences in influenza vaccination coverage among VFC-entitled versus privately insured children was encouraging, nearly half of all children were not vaccinated for influenza and coverage was particularly low among uninsured children. Additional public health interventions are needed to ensure that more children are vaccinated such as a strong recommendation from health care providers, utilization of immunization information systems, provider reminders, standing orders, and community-based interventions such as educational activities and expanded access to vaccination services.
儿童疫苗计划(VFC)为符合医疗补助资格、未参保、美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)、未充分参保且在联邦合格健康中心或农村健康诊所接种疫苗的儿童免费提供疫苗。本研究的目的是比较在美国全国、各州以及按选定的社会人口统计学变量划分的情况下,符合VFC资格的儿童与私人参保儿童的流感疫苗接种覆盖率。
对2011 - 2012年和2012 - 2013年流感季节全国免疫调查 - 流感(NIS - Flu)中6个月至17岁儿童家庭的数据进行分析。根据电话访谈中向家长询问的问题来确定VFC资格和私人保险状况。通过t检验比较符合VFC资格儿童与私人参保儿童的流感疫苗接种覆盖率估计值,分别在全国、州内以及选定的社会人口统计学变量范围内进行比较。
在研究的两个季节中,符合VFC资格的儿童的流感疫苗接种覆盖率与私人参保儿童的覆盖率没有显著差异(2011 - 2012年:52.0%±1.9%对50.7%±1.2%;2012 - 2013年:56.0%±1.6%对57.2%±1.2%)。在符合VFC资格的儿童中,未参保儿童的接种覆盖率较低(2011 - 2012年:38.9%±4.7%;2012 - 2013年:44.8%±3.5%),低于符合医疗补助资格的儿童(2011 - 2012年:55.2%±2.1%;2012 - 2013年:58.6%±1.9%)和美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民儿童(2011 - 2012年:54.4%±11.3%;2012 - 2013年:54.6%±7.0%)。在种族/族裔、收入、年龄、地区以及居住在大都市统计区主要城市等一些亚组中,观察到符合VFC资格儿童与私人参保儿童在疫苗接种覆盖率上存在显著差异。
尽管发现符合VFC资格的儿童与私人参保儿童在流感疫苗接种覆盖率上差异不大令人鼓舞,但几乎一半的儿童未接种流感疫苗,且未参保儿童的接种覆盖率尤其低。需要采取更多公共卫生干预措施,以确保更多儿童接种疫苗,例如医疗保健提供者的强烈建议、免疫信息系统的利用、提供者提醒、常规医嘱,以及基于社区的干预措施,如教育活动和扩大疫苗接种服务的可及性。