Ivanidze J, Kallas O N, Gupta A, Weidman E, Baradaran H, Mir D, Giambrone A, Segal A Z, Claassen J, Sanelli P C
From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., O.N.K., A.Gupta, E.W., H.B., D.M., P.C.S.)
From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., O.N.K., A.Gupta, E.W., H.B., D.M., P.C.S.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Sep;37(9):1599-603. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4784. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
Blood-brain barrier permeability is not routinely evaluated in the clinical setting. Global cerebral edema occurs after SAH and is associated with BBB disruption. Detection of global cerebral edema using current imaging techniques is challenging. Our purpose was to apply blood-brain barrier permeability imaging in patients with global cerebral edema by using extended CT perfusion.
Patients with SAH underwent CTP in the early phase after aneurysmal rupture (days 0-3) and were classified as having global cerebral edema or nonglobal cerebral edema using established noncontrast CT criteria. CTP data were postprocessed into blood-brain barrier permeability quantitative maps of PS (permeability surface-area product), K(trans) (volume transfer constant from blood plasma to extravascular extracellular space), Kep (washout rate constant of the contrast agent from extravascular extracellular space to intravascular space), VE (extravascular extracellular space volume per unit of tissue volume), VP (plasmatic volume per unit of tissue volume), and F (plasma flow) by using Olea Sphere software. Mean values were compared using t tests.
Twenty-two patients were included in the analysis. Kep (1.32 versus 1.52, P < .0001), K(trans) (0.15 versus 0.19, P < .0001), VP (0.51 versus 0.57, P = .0007), and F (1176 versus 1329, P = .0001) were decreased in global cerebral edema compared with nonglobal cerebral edema while VE (0.81 versus 0.39, P < .0001) was increased.
Extended CTP was used to evaluate blood-brain barrier permeability in patients with SAH with and without global cerebral edema. Kep is an important indicator of altered blood-brain barrier permeability in patients with decreased blood flow, as Kep is flow-independent. Further study of blood-brain barrier permeability is needed to improve diagnosis and monitoring of global cerebral edema.
在临床环境中,血脑屏障通透性通常不会进行常规评估。蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后会发生全脑水肿,且与血脑屏障破坏有关。使用当前的成像技术检测全脑水肿具有挑战性。我们的目的是通过扩展CT灌注技术,对全脑水肿患者进行血脑屏障通透性成像。
SAH患者在动脉瘤破裂后的早期阶段(第0 - 3天)接受CT灌注检查,并根据既定的非增强CT标准分为全脑水肿组或非全脑水肿组。使用Olea Sphere软件将CT灌注数据后处理为血脑屏障通透性定量图,包括PS(通透表面积乘积)、K(trans)(从血浆到血管外细胞外间隙的容积转移常数)、Kep(造影剂从血管外细胞外间隙到血管内间隙的洗脱速率常数)、VE(每单位组织体积的血管外细胞外间隙体积)、VP(每单位组织体积的血浆体积)和F(血浆流量)。使用t检验比较平均值。
22例患者纳入分析。与非全脑水肿相比,全脑水肿患者的Kep(1.32对1.52,P <.0001)、K(trans)(0.15对0.19,P <.0001)、VP(0.51对0.57,P =.0007)和F(1176对1329,P =.0001)降低,而VE(0.81对0.39,P <.0001)升高。
扩展CT灌注技术用于评估有无全脑水肿的SAH患者的血脑屏障通透性。Kep是血流减少患者血脑屏障通透性改变的重要指标,因为Kep与血流无关。需要进一步研究血脑屏障通透性以改善全脑水肿的诊断和监测。