Allingham Michael J, Nie Qing, Lad Eleonora M, Izatt Daniel J, Mettu Priyatham S, Cousins Scott W, Farsiu Sina
Department of Ophthalmology Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Apr 1;57(4):2283-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-19008.
To develop image analysis software usable by nonexpert graders to segment geographic atrophy (GA) from dry AMD and to quantify rim area focal hyperautofluorescence (RAFH) surrounding GA on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images. To compare the GA progression predictions based on RAFH with those of a validated qualitative classification system.
Retrospective analysis of serial FAF images from 49 eyes of 30 subjects with GA was performed using MATLAB-based software (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Correlation between RAFH and progression of GA was analyzed using Spearman correlation. Comparisons of lesion growth rate between RAFH tertiles used generalized estimating equations and Kruskal-Wallis testing. Interobserver variability in lesion size, growth rate and RAFH were compared between two expert and one nonexpert grader using Bland-Altman statistics.
Rim area focal hyperautofluorescence was positively correlated with GA progression rate (ρ = 0.49, P < 0.001). Subjects in the middle or highest RAFH tertile were at greater risk of progression (P = 0.005 and P = 0.001, respectively). Mean difference in RAFH was 0.012 between expert and -0.005 to 0.017 between expert and nonexperts. Mean difference in lesion size (mm2) was 0.11 between expert and -0.29 to 0.41 between expert and nonexperts. Mean difference in lesion growth rate (mm2/mo) was 0.0098 between expert and -0.027 to 0.037 between expert and nonexperts. Risk stratification based on RAFH tertile was 96% identical across all graders.
Our semiautomated image analysis software facilitates stratification of progression risk based on RAFH and enabled a nonexpert grader with minimal training to obtain results comparable to expert graders. Predictions based on RAFH were similar to those of a validated qualitative classification system.
开发一种非专业分级人员也能使用的图像分析软件,用于从干性年龄相关性黄斑变性中分割出地图样萎缩(GA),并在眼底自发荧光(FAF)图像上量化GA周围的边缘区域局灶性高自发荧光(RAFH)。比较基于RAFH的GA进展预测与经过验证的定性分类系统的预测。
使用基于MATLAB的软件(美国马萨诸塞州纳蒂克市MathWorks公司)对30名患有GA的受试者的49只眼睛的系列FAF图像进行回顾性分析。使用Spearman相关性分析RAFH与GA进展之间的相关性。使用广义估计方程和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较RAFH三分位数之间的病变生长率。使用Bland-Altman统计方法比较两名专家分级人员和一名非专家分级人员在病变大小、生长率和RAFH方面的观察者间变异性。
边缘区域局灶性高自发荧光与GA进展率呈正相关(ρ = 0.49,P < 0.001)。处于RAFH三分位数中或最高的受试者进展风险更高(分别为P = 0.005和P = 0.001)。专家之间RAFH的平均差异为0.012,专家与非专家之间为-0.005至0.017。专家之间病变大小(mm²)的平均差异为0.11,专家与非专家之间为-0.29至0.41。专家之间病变生长率(mm²/月)的平均差异为0.0098,专家与非专家之间为-0.027至0.037。基于RAFH三分位数的风险分层在所有分级人员中96%相同。
我们的半自动图像分析软件有助于基于RAFH对进展风险进行分层,并使经过最少培训的非专家分级人员能够获得与专家分级人员相当的结果。基于RAFH的预测与经过验证的定性分类系统的预测相似。