• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测关节镜下肩袖修复术后有症状的结构失败的形态学危险因素:撕裂大小、位置和萎缩情况很重要。

Morphologic Risk Factors in Predicting Symptomatic Structural Failure of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: Tear Size, Location, and Atrophy Matter.

作者信息

Gasbarro Gregory, Ye Jason, Newsome Hillary, Jiang Kevin, Wright Vonda, Vyas Dharmesh, Irrgang James J, Musahl Volker

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A..

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):1947-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.067. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.067
PMID:27129377
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether morphologic characteristics of rotator cuff tear have prognostic value in determining symptomatic structural failure of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair independent of age or gender.

METHODS

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair cases performed by five fellowship-trained surgeons at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Data extraction included demographics, comorbidities, repair technique, clinical examination, and radiographic findings. Failure in symptomatic patients was defined as structural defect on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging or pseudoparalysis on examination. Failures were age and gender matched with successful repairs in a 1:2 ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 30 failures and 60 controls were identified. Supraspinatus atrophy (P = .03) and tear size (18.3 mm failures v 13.9 mm controls; P = .02) were significant risk factors for failure, as was the presence of an infraspinatus tear greater than 10 mm (62% v 17%, P < .01). Single-row repair (P = .06) and simple suture configuration (P = .17) were more common but similar between groups. Diabetes mellitus and active tobacco use were not significantly associated with increased failure risk but psychiatric medication use was more frequent in the failure group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms previous suspicions that tear size and fatty infiltration are associated with failure of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair but independent of age or gender in symptomatic patients. There is also a quantitative cutoff on magnetic resonance imaging for the size of infraspinatus involvement that can be used clinically as a predicting factor. Although reported in the literature, smoking and diabetes were not associated with failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case control.

摘要

目的

评估肩袖撕裂的形态学特征在确定关节镜下肩袖修复的症状性结构失败方面是否具有预后价值,且不受年龄或性别的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了2006年至2013年在本机构由五位接受过 fellowship 培训的外科医生进行的关节镜下肩袖修复病例。数据提取包括人口统计学、合并症、修复技术、临床检查和影像学检查结果。有症状患者的失败定义为术后磁共振成像显示的结构缺陷或检查时的假性麻痹。失败病例与成功修复病例按1:2的比例进行年龄和性别匹配。

结果

共确定了30例失败病例和60例对照。冈上肌萎缩(P = 0.03)和撕裂大小(失败组为18.3 mm,对照组为13.9 mm;P = 0.02)是失败的重要危险因素,大于10 mm的冈下肌撕裂的存在也是如此(62%对17%,P < 0.01)。单排修复(P = 0.06)和简单缝合构型(P = 0.17)更常见,但两组之间相似。糖尿病和当前吸烟与失败风险增加无显著关联,但失败组使用精神科药物更为频繁。

结论

本研究证实了先前的怀疑,即撕裂大小和脂肪浸润与关节镜下肩袖修复失败相关,但在有症状患者中不受年龄或性别的影响。磁共振成像上也有一个关于冈下肌受累大小的定量临界值,可在临床上用作预测因素。虽然文献中有报道,但吸烟和糖尿病与失败无关。

证据级别

III级,回顾性病例对照研究。

相似文献

1
Morphologic Risk Factors in Predicting Symptomatic Structural Failure of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: Tear Size, Location, and Atrophy Matter.预测关节镜下肩袖修复术后有症状的结构失败的形态学危险因素:撕裂大小、位置和萎缩情况很重要。
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):1947-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.067. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
2
Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique.关节镜下双排技术修复肩袖后的系列磁共振成像评估
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 May;136(5):665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2409-9. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
3
The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. Surgical technique.采用双排缝线锚钉技术进行关节镜下肩袖修补术的结果及结构完整性。手术技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90 Suppl 2 Pt 2:275-86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00388.
4
Factors Predictive of Healing in Large Rotator Cuff Tears: Is It Possible to Predict Retear Preoperatively?大肩袖撕裂愈合的预测因素:术前能否预测再撕裂?
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;46(7):1693-1700. doi: 10.1177/0363546518762386. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
5
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?关节镜下缝合桥技术修复肩袖撕裂:修复的完整性是否得到维持?
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2108-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546510397171. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Risk Factors for Medium-Sized Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age.一项评估 50 岁以下患者中型肩袖撕裂风险因素的对比研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Nov;34(11):2971-2979. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.031.
7
The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique.使用双排缝线锚钉技术进行关节镜下肩袖修复的结果及结构完整性
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1533-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00305.
8
Factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair: osteoporosis as one of the independent risk factors.影响关节镜修复后肩袖愈合的因素:骨质疏松是独立危险因素之一。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2099-107. doi: 10.1177/0363546511415659. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
Evaluation of Repair Tension in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Really Matter to the Integrity of the Rotator Cuff?关节镜下肩袖修补术中修复张力的评估:它对肩袖完整性真的重要吗?
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2807-2812. doi: 10.1177/0363546516651831. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
10
Evaluation of the Risk Factors for a Rotator Cuff Retear After Repair Surgery.修复手术后肩袖撕裂的危险因素评估
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1755-1761. doi: 10.1177/0363546517695234. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Predictors of the Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Arthroscopic Repair.肩袖关节镜修复术预后的关键预测因素
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 28;60(1):1-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1802963. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Does the Timing of the Initiation of Physical Therapy Post-Rotator Cuff Repair Impact Shoulder Function?肩袖修复术后开始物理治疗的时机是否会影响肩部功能?
Health Care Sci. 2025 Feb 17;4(1):35-43. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.70001. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Stiffness and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review.
僵硬与关节镜下肩袖修复:文献综述
Ann Jt. 2023 Jan 9;8:7. doi: 10.21037/aoj-22-26. eCollection 2023.
4
The 2022 International Society for Hip Preservation (ISHA) physiotherapy agreement on assessment and treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS): an international consensus statement.2022年国际髋关节保留学会(ISHA)关于大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)评估与治疗的物理治疗共识:一项国际共识声明
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023 Jan 2;10(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnac050. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Approaching Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Predictive Analytics and Machine Learning to Prognosticate Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgical Outcomes.骨科领域中的人工智能应用:利用预测分析和机器学习预测关节镜下肩袖手术结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 19;12(6):2369. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062369.
6
Tips and Tricks for Augmenting Rotator Cuff Repair With a Bio-inductive Collagen Implant.使用生物诱导胶原蛋白植入物增强肩袖修复的技巧与窍门。
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Nov 9;10(12):e2659-e2665. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.007. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Factors associated with the development of re-tear following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective comparative study.关节镜下肩袖修补术后再撕裂发生的相关因素:一项回顾性对照研究。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 May;55(3):213-219. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20091.
8
Clinical and Structural Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-analysis.糖尿病患者肩袖修复术后的临床和结构结局:一项荟萃分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Sep 17;8(9):2325967120948499. doi: 10.1177/2325967120948499. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Factors Influencing the Reparability and Healing Rates of Rotator Cuff Tears.影响肩袖撕裂修复性和愈合率的因素。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Oct;13(5):572-583. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09660-w.
10
In situ tissue engineering of the tendon-to-bone interface by endogenous stem/progenitor cells.内源性干细胞/祖细胞原位组织工程肌腱-骨界面。
Biofabrication. 2019 Nov 18;12(1):015008. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab48ca.