Kim Gichul, HwangBo Pil-Neo
Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu Health College, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu University Graduate School of Physical Therapy, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):1012-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Schroth and Pilates exercises on the Cobb angle and body weight distribution of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. [Subjects] Twenty-four scoliosis patients with a Cobb angle of ≥20° were divided into the Schroth exercise group (SEG, n = 12) and the Pilates exercise group (PEG, n = 12). [Methods] The SEG and PEG performed Schroth and Pilates exercises, respectively, three times a week for 12 weeks. The Cobb angle was measured in the standing position with a radiography apparatus, and weight load was measured with Gait View Pro 1.0. [Results] In the intragroup comparison, both groups showed significant changes in the Cobb angle. For weight distribution, the SEG showed significant differences in the total weight between the concave and convex sides, but the PEG did not show significant differences. Furthermore, in the intragroup comparison, the SEG showed significant differences in the changes in the Cobb angle and weight distribution compared with the PEG. [Conclusion] Both Schroth and Pilates exercises were effective in changing the Cobb angle and weight distribution of scoliosis patients; however, the intergroup comparison showed that the Schroth exercise was more effective than the Pilates exercise.
[目的]本研究旨在比较施罗斯疗法和普拉提运动对特发性脊柱侧凸患者Cobb角和体重分布的影响。[对象]24例Cobb角≥20°的脊柱侧凸患者被分为施罗斯运动组(SEG,n = 12)和普拉提运动组(PEG,n = 12)。[方法]SEG和PEG分别进行施罗斯疗法和普拉提运动,每周3次,共12周。使用射线照相设备在站立位测量Cobb角,并用Gait View Pro 1.0测量体重负荷。[结果]组内比较中,两组的Cobb角均有显著变化。对于体重分布,SEG凹侧和凸侧的总体重有显著差异,但PEG未显示出显著差异。此外,在组内比较中,与PEG相比,SEG在Cobb角和体重分布的变化方面有显著差异。[结论]施罗斯疗法和普拉提运动对改变脊柱侧凸患者的Cobb角和体重分布均有效;然而,组间比较表明,施罗斯运动比普拉提运动更有效。