• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对学校环境中儿童和青少年心理健康的通用复原力干预措施的系统评价:综述方案

Systematic review of universal resilience interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting: review protocol.

作者信息

Dray Julia, Bowman Jenny, Wolfenden Luke, Campbell Elizabeth, Freund Megan, Hodder Rebecca, Wiggers John

机构信息

Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.

The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;4:186. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0172-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-015-0172-6
PMID:26715359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4696155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The mental health of children and adolescents is a key area of health concern internationally. Previous empirical studies suggest that resilience may act as a protective mechanism towards the development of mental health problems. Resilience refers to the ability to employ a collection of protective factors to return to or maintain positive mental health following disadvantage or adversity. Schools represent a potential setting within which protective factors of all children and adolescents may be fostered through resilience-focussed interventions. Despite this potential, limited research has investigated the effectiveness of universal school-based resilience-focussed interventions on mental health outcomes in children and adolescents. The objective of the present review is to assess the effects of universal school-based resilience-focussed interventions, relative to a comparison group, on mental health outcomes in children and adolescents.

METHODS/DESIGN: Eligible studies will be randomised (including cluster-randomised) controlled trials of universal interventions explicitly described as resilience-focussed or comprising strategies to strengthen a minimum of three internal protective factors, targeting children aged 5 to 18 years, implemented within schools, and reporting a mental health outcome. Screening for studies will be conducted across six electronic databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Two reviewers will retrieve eligible articles, assess risk of bias, and extract data. Where studies are sufficiently homogenous and reported outcomes are amenable for pooled synthesis, meta-analysis will be performed. Narrative description will be used to synthesise trial outcome data where data cannot be combined or heterogeneity exists.

DISCUSSION

This review will aid in building an evidence base for the effectiveness of universal school-based resilience-focussed interventions and in doing so provide an opportunity to better inform the development of interventions to potentially prevent mental health problems in child and adolescent populations.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015025908.

摘要

背景

儿童和青少年的心理健康是国际上健康关注的关键领域。以往的实证研究表明,心理韧性可能是预防心理健康问题发展的一种保护机制。心理韧性是指在遭遇不利或逆境后,运用一系列保护因素恢复或维持积极心理健康的能力。学校是一个潜在的场所,通过以心理韧性为重点的干预措施,可以培养所有儿童和青少年的保护因素。尽管有这种潜力,但针对以心理韧性为重点的全校性干预措施对儿童和青少年心理健康结果有效性的研究却很有限。本综述的目的是评估相对于对照组,以心理韧性为重点的全校性干预措施对儿童和青少年心理健康结果的影响。

方法/设计:符合条件的研究将是随机(包括整群随机)对照试验,这些试验是明确以心理韧性为重点或包含强化至少三种内部保护因素策略的全校性干预措施,针对5至18岁的儿童,在学校内实施,并报告心理健康结果。将在六个电子数据库中进行研究筛选:医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)。两名评审员将检索符合条件的文章,评估偏倚风险,并提取数据。如果研究足够同质且报告的结果适合进行汇总合成,将进行荟萃分析。当数据无法合并或存在异质性时,将使用叙述性描述来综合试验结果数据。

讨论

本综述将有助于为以心理韧性为重点的全校性干预措施的有效性建立证据基础,并借此机会更好地为制定可能预防儿童和青少年心理健康问题的干预措施提供信息。

系统综述注册

国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)CRD42015025908。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of universal resilience interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting: review protocol.针对学校环境中儿童和青少年心理健康的通用复原力干预措施的系统评价:综述方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;4:186. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0172-6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Systematic Review of Universal Resilience-Focused Interventions Targeting Child and Adolescent Mental Health in the School Setting.系统评价:在学校环境中针对儿童和青少年心理健康的普遍注重韧性的干预措施
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;56(10):813-824. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.07.780. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
Systematic review of universal school-based resilience interventions targeting adolescent tobacco, alcohol or illicit drug use: review protocol.针对青少年烟草、酒精或非法药物使用的基于学校的普遍复原力干预措施的系统评价:评价方案
BMJ Open. 2014 May 26;4(5):e004718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004718.
5
Improving adolescent mental health and resilience through a resilience-based intervention in schools: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.通过基于复原力的学校干预措施改善青少年心理健康和复原力:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jul 18;15:289. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-289.
6
Examining the mental health outcomes of peer-led school-based interventions on young people aged between 4 and 18 years old: a systematic review protocol.检查 4 至 18 岁青少年群体中同伴主导的学校为基础的干预措施对其心理健康结果的影响:系统综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 26;8(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1027-3.
7
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.针对儿童和青少年预防意外伤害的校本教育项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.
8
Systematic review of effectiveness of universal self-regulation-based interventions and their effects on distal health and social outcomes in children and adolescents: review protocol.系统评价基于普遍自我调节的干预措施的有效性及其对儿童和青少年的远端健康和社会结果的影响:综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 29;6(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0570-z.
9
Mental health resilience in offspring of depressed parents: a systematic literature review protocol.抑郁父母后代的心理健康弹性:系统文献综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;11(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02056-6.
10
Systematic review of interventions to increase the provision of care for chronic disease risk behaviours in mental health settings: review protocol.系统评价干预措施以增加在精神卫生环境中提供慢性病风险行为护理的研究:方案综述。
Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 30;7(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0735-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and factors associated with resilience in Peruvian adolescent schoolchildren during the early post-pandemic context: a cross-sectional study.疫情后初期秘鲁青少年学生心理韧性的患病率及相关因素:一项横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 25;16:1609190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1609190. eCollection 2025.
2
Enhancing resilience in single-parent family adolescents in China: a randomized controlled trial based on home-school collaborative intervention.增强中国单亲家庭青少年的心理韧性:一项基于家校合作干预的随机对照试验
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):1573. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22662-y.
3
The Healthy Minds, Thriving Kids Project: Educator perspectives on relevance and potential impact of a mental health skill building program.“健康心灵,茁壮成长的孩子”项目:教育工作者对心理健康技能培养项目的相关性及潜在影响的看法
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 24;20(3):e0305450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305450. eCollection 2025.
4
A Framework for School-Based Mental Health Programs in Conflict Zones.冲突地区校内心理健康项目框架
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jan;61(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01322-2. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
5
Mental health status according to the dual-factor model in Swedish adolescents: A cross sectional study highlighting associations with stress, resilience, social status and gender.基于双因素模型的瑞典青少年心理健康状况:一项横断面研究,重点探讨了与压力、韧性、社会地位和性别之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 1;19(3):e0299225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299225. eCollection 2024.
6
Effect of online intervention based on life skills for mental health, self-efficacy and coping skills among Arab adolescents in the Klang Valley, Malaysia: A cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.基于生活技能的在线干预对马来西亚吉隆坡谷地区阿拉伯青少年心理健康、自我效能感和应对技能的影响:一项集群随机对照试验方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298627. eCollection 2024.
7
Effectiveness of Life Skills Intervention on Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.生活技能干预对儿童和青少年抑郁、焦虑及压力的有效性:一项系统综述。
Malays J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;30(3):42-59. doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.3.4. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
8
The study protocol for the randomized controlled trial of the effects of a theory-based intervention on resilience, social capital, psychological wellbeing, and health-promoting lifestyle in healthcare workers.基于理论的干预对医护人员韧性、社会资本、心理幸福感和促进健康生活方式影响的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;11(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01098-2.
9
Social and Emotional Learning and Internalizing Problems among Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Resilience.青少年的社会情感学习与内化问题:复原力的中介作用。
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;9(9):1326. doi: 10.3390/children9091326.
10
The Impact of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Psycho-Education Program on Psychological Resilience, Irrational Beliefs, and Well-Being.认知行为团体心理教育计划对心理韧性、非理性信念和幸福感的影响。
J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther. 2021;39(4):672-694. doi: 10.1007/s10942-021-00392-5. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
INTEGRATED MODELS OF SCHOOL-BASED PREVENTION: LOGIC AND THEORY.基于学校的预防综合模式:逻辑与理论
Psychol Sch. 2010 Jan;47(1):71-88. doi: 10.1002/pits.20452.
2
Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents.年度研究综述:儿童和青少年精神障碍全球患病率的荟萃分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):345-65. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12381. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
3
The efficacy of resiliency training programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.复原力训练项目的疗效:随机试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e111420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111420. eCollection 2014.
4
Building resilience for future adversity: a systematic review of interventions in non-clinical samples of adults.培养应对未来逆境的韧性:非临床成人样本干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 14;14:227. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0227-6.
5
Does a socio-ecological school model promote resilience in primary schools?社会生态学校模式能否促进小学的适应力?
J Sch Health. 2013 Nov;83(11):795-804. doi: 10.1111/josh.12096.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review.社会经济不平等与儿童和青少年心理健康问题:系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;90:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.026. Epub 2013 May 4.
7
Towards a new paradigm of care: the International Declaration on Youth Mental Health.迈向新的护理范式:《国际青年心理健康宣言》
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 May;7(2):103-8. doi: 10.1111/eip.12048.
8
Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action.儿童和青少年全球精神卫生:采取行动的证据。
Lancet. 2011 Oct 22;378(9801):1515-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60827-1. Epub 2011 Oct 16.
9
Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions.常规和非常规护理:行为干预随机对照试验中的现有实践对照组。
Psychosom Med. 2011 May;73(4):323-35. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318218e1fb. Epub 2011 May 2.
10
Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication--Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A).美国青少年精神障碍终身患病率:全国共病调查再现-青少年增补研究(NCS-A)的结果。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):980-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 Jul 31.