Suppr超能文献

飞机上的身体和情境不平等预示着空中暴怒。

Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage.

作者信息

DeCelles Katherine A, Norton Michael I

机构信息

Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management Area, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3E6;

Marketing Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 17;113(20):5588-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521727113. Epub 2016 May 2.

Abstract

We posit that the modern airplane is a social microcosm of class-based society, and that the increasing incidence of "air rage" can be understood through the lens of inequality. Research on inequality typically examines the effects of relatively fixed, macrostructural forms of inequality, such as socioeconomic status; we examine how temporary exposure to both physical and situational inequality, induced by the design of environments, can foster antisocial behavior. We use a complete set of all onboard air rage incidents over several years from a large, international airline to test our predictions. Physical inequality on airplanes-that is, the presence of a first class cabin-is associated with more frequent air rage incidents in economy class. Situational inequality-boarding from the front (requiring walking through the first class cabin) versus the middle of the plane-also significantly increases the odds of air rage in both economy and first class. We show that physical design that highlights inequality can trigger antisocial behavior on airplanes. More broadly, these results point to the importance of considering the design of environments-from airplanes to office layouts to stadium seating-in understanding both the form and emergence of antisocial behavior.

摘要

我们认为,现代飞机是基于阶层的社会的一个社会缩影,“空中暴怒”发生率的不断上升可以通过不平等的视角来理解。对不平等的研究通常考察相对固定的宏观结构形式的不平等的影响,比如社会经济地位;我们研究的是,由环境设计导致的对身体和情境不平等的短暂接触如何助长反社会行为。我们使用一家大型国际航空公司多年来所有机上空中暴怒事件的完整数据集来检验我们的预测。飞机上的身体不平等——即头等舱的存在——与经济舱更频繁的空中暴怒事件相关。情境不平等——从飞机前部登机(需要穿过头等舱)与从飞机中部登机相比——也显著增加了经济舱和头等舱发生空中暴怒的几率。我们表明,突出不平等的物理设计会引发飞机上的反社会行为。更广泛地说,这些结果表明,在理解反社会行为的形式和出现时,考虑从飞机到办公室布局再到体育场馆座位等环境设计的重要性。

相似文献

1
Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage.飞机上的身体和情境不平等预示着空中暴怒。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 17;113(20):5588-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521727113. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
Optimal back-to-front airplane boarding.飞机从前向后的最佳登机方式。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jun;87(6):062805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.062805. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
Health issues of air travel.航空旅行的健康问题。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:133-51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.140853. Epub 2002 Oct 23.
9
Patterns of measles transmission among airplane travelers.飞机旅行者麻疹传播模式。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;10(5-6):230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

4
Inequality in abundance.富足中的不平等。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Jul 29;7:980677. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.980677. eCollection 2022.
6
Income inequality and mass shootings in the United States.美国的收入不平等与大规模枪击事件。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;19(1):1147. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7490-x.
7
The impact of personal relative deprivation on aggression over time.个人相对剥夺感对攻击行为的长期影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(6):664-675. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1549013. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.高度的经济不平等会导致高收入个体变得不那么慷慨。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 29;112(52):15838-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511536112. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior.社会阶层越高,越有可能做出不道德的行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 13;109(11):4086-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118373109. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
6
Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy.社会阶层、语境主义和同理心准确性。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1716-23. doi: 10.1177/0956797610387613. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
8
Health disparities through a psychological lens.从心理学角度看健康差异。
Am Psychol. 2009 Nov;64(8):663-73. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.663.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验