• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剥夺体验:相对地位而非绝对地位更能预测敌意吗?

The experience of deprivation: Does relative more than absolute status predict hostility?

机构信息

University of Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):515-533. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12288. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12288
PMID:30375005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6618103/
Abstract

The present research examined the causal effects of absolute and relative status on experienced deprivation and hostility. On the basis of the theory of relative deprivation, we reasoned that the subjective experience of being worse off than others is a better predictor for hostility than is the absolute level of how well-off people are. Indeed, three experiments showed that relative more than absolute status has an impact on aggressive affect. That is, even when objective resources were high, people were more hostile when their resources compared negatively to others' resources. Although no consistent direct effects were found for a measure of aggressive behaviour, mediation analyses suggest that relative but not absolute deprivation ultimately impacts aggressive behaviour via increased feelings of disadvantage and aggressive affect. The results emphasize the drastic consequences of the rising income inequality, irrespective of a nation's absolute wealth.

摘要

本研究考察了绝对地位和相对地位对体验剥夺和敌意的因果影响。基于相对剥夺理论,我们推断,与人们的富裕程度相比,主观上感觉自己不如他人更能预测敌意。事实上,三项实验表明,相对地位而不是绝对地位对攻击情绪有影响。也就是说,即使客观资源很高,如果人们的资源与他人的资源相比处于劣势,他们就会更加敌对。虽然对于攻击行为的衡量标准没有发现一致的直接影响,但中介分析表明,相对剥夺而不是绝对剥夺最终通过增加劣势感和攻击情绪来影响攻击行为。研究结果强调了收入不平等加剧的严重后果,而不论一个国家的绝对财富如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530e/6618103/11a9e742a153/BJSO-58-515-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530e/6618103/37b97bf705ec/BJSO-58-515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530e/6618103/8de5e34d7e5d/BJSO-58-515-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530e/6618103/11a9e742a153/BJSO-58-515-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530e/6618103/37b97bf705ec/BJSO-58-515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530e/6618103/8de5e34d7e5d/BJSO-58-515-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530e/6618103/11a9e742a153/BJSO-58-515-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The experience of deprivation: Does relative more than absolute status predict hostility?剥夺体验:相对地位而非绝对地位更能预测敌意吗?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):515-533. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12288. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
2
Increasing wealth inequality may increase interpersonal hostility: The relationship between personal relative deprivation and aggression.日益加剧的财富不平等可能会增加人际间的敌意:个人相对剥夺感与攻击性之间的关系。
J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(6):766-776. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1288078. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: A test of the theory of social deprivation.主观社会经济地位导致攻击行为:社会剥夺理论的检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Aug;111(2):178-94. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000058. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
Belief in Social Mobility Mitigates Hostility Resulting From Disadvantaged Social Standing.社会流动信仰减轻了因社会地位不利而产生的敌意。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;45(4):541-556. doi: 10.1177/0146167218789073. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
5
Bracing for the worst, but behaving the best: social anxiety, hostility, and behavioral aggression.做好最坏的打算,但表现得最好:社交焦虑、敌意和行为攻击。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Mar;24(2):260-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
6
Seeing red: How perceptions of social status and worth influence hostile attributions and endorsement of aggression.怒目而视:社会地位和价值观念如何影响敌意归因及对攻击行为的认同。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;54(4):728-47. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12109. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
The impact of personal relative deprivation on aggression over time.个人相对剥夺感对攻击行为的长期影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(6):664-675. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1549013. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Do aggression and rule-breaking have different interpersonal correlates? A study of antisocial behavior subtypes, negative affect, and hostile perceptions of others.攻击行为和违规行为是否有不同的人际关联?一项关于反社会行为亚型、消极情绪及对他人的敌意认知的研究。
Aggress Behav. 2009 Nov-Dec;35(6):453-61. doi: 10.1002/ab.20324.
9
Eye Gaze Patterns Associated with Aggressive Tendencies in Adolescence.与青少年攻击倾向相关的眼球注视模式。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):747-756. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9573-8.
10
Humor as aggression: effects of motivation on hostility expressed in humor appreciation.幽默即攻击:动机对幽默欣赏中表现出的敌意的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jun;100(6):1043-55. doi: 10.1037/a0022495.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of shyness in cyberbullying perpetration: a moderated mediation model of relative deprivation, anger rumination, and Internet morality.羞怯在网络欺凌行为中的作用:相对剥夺、愤怒沉思和网络道德的调节中介模型
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22503-y.
2
Deciphering the mechanism of women's mental health: a perspective of urban-rural differences.解读女性心理健康机制:城乡差异视角
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1545640. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1545640. eCollection 2025.
3
The impact of social exclusion on impulsive buying behaviour of consumers on online platforms: Samples from China.

本文引用的文献

1
Belief in Social Mobility Mitigates Hostility Resulting From Disadvantaged Social Standing.社会流动信仰减轻了因社会地位不利而产生的敌意。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;45(4):541-556. doi: 10.1177/0146167218789073. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
2
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour.社会阶层心理学:社会经济地位如何影响思想、情感和行为。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):267-291. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12251. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
3
Increasing wealth inequality may increase interpersonal hostility: The relationship between personal relative deprivation and aggression.
社会排斥对在线平台消费者冲动购买行为的影响:来自中国的样本
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 4;10(1):e23319. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23319. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
4
The role of perceived minority-group status in the conspiracy beliefs of factual majority groups.被感知的少数群体地位在实际多数群体的阴谋论信念中的作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Oct 18;10(10):221036. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221036. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
The relationship between Group relative deprivation and aggressive collective action online toward deprivation-related Provocateurs within the Group: the mediating role of hostile feelings.群体相对剥夺感与群体内针对与剥夺相关的挑衅者的网络攻击性集体行动之间的关系:敌对情绪的中介作用。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Aug 17:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03530-z.
6
Foreign nurse educators' lived experiences of incivility: The case for Botswana.外国护士教育工作者遭遇不文明行为的亲身经历:以博茨瓦纳为例
Curationis. 2020 Dec 21;43(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v43i1.2162.
7
The impact of personal relative deprivation on aggression over time.个人相对剥夺感对攻击行为的长期影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(6):664-675. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1549013. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
日益加剧的财富不平等可能会增加人际间的敌意:个人相对剥夺感与攻击性之间的关系。
J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(6):766-776. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1288078. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: A test of the theory of social deprivation.主观社会经济地位导致攻击行为:社会剥夺理论的检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Aug;111(2):178-94. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000058. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
5
Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage.飞机上的身体和情境不平等预示着空中暴怒。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 17;113(20):5588-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521727113. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
The rich get richer, the poor get even: Perceived socioeconomic position influences micro-social distributions of wealth.富者愈富,贫者更贫:感知到的社会经济地位影响财富的微观社会分配。
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Jun;57(3):243-9. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12281. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
7
Poverty, inequality, and increased consumption of high calorie food: Experimental evidence for a causal link.贫困、不平等和高热量食物消费的增加:因果关系的实验证据。
Appetite. 2016 May 1;100:162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
8
Subjective status shapes political preferences.主观状态塑造政治偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):15-26. doi: 10.1177/0956797614553947. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
Effects of Prosocial, Neutral, and Violent Video Games on Children's Helpful and Hurtful Behaviors.亲社会、中性和暴力电子游戏对儿童助人及伤害行为的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2012 Jul-Aug;38(4):281-7. doi: 10.1002/ab.21428.
10
The voodoo doll task: Introducing and validating a novel method for studying aggressive inclinations.巫毒娃娃任务:介绍和验证一种研究攻击倾向的新方法。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):419-39. doi: 10.1002/ab.21496. Epub 2013 Jul 22.