• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非ST段抬高型心肌梗死后的超额死亡率和指南推荐治疗

Excess mortality and guideline-indicated care following non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Dondo Tatendashe B, Hall Marlous, Timmis Adam D, Gilthorpe Mark S, Alabas Oras A, Batin Phillip D, Deanfield John E, Hemingway Harry, Gale Chris P

机构信息

1 Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.

2 The National Institute for Health Biomedical Research Unit, Barts Health, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Aug;6(5):412-420. doi: 10.1177/2048872616647705. Epub 2016 May 3.

DOI:10.1177/2048872616647705
PMID:27142174
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adherence to guideline-indicated care for the treatment of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is associated with improved outcomes. We investigated the extent and consequences of non-adherence to guideline-indicated care across a national health system.

METHODS

A cohort study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02436187) was conducted using data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project ( n = 389,057 NSTEMI, n = 247 hospitals, England and Wales, 2003-2013). Accelerated failure time models were used to quantify the impact of non-adherence on survival according to dates of guideline publication.

RESULTS

Over a period of 1,079,044 person-years (median 2.2 years of follow-up), 113,586 (29.2%) NSTEMI patients died. Of those eligible to receive care, 337,881 (86.9%) did not receive one or more guideline-indicated intervention; the most frequently missed were dietary advice ( n = 254,869, 68.1%), smoking cessation advice ( n = 245,357, 87.9%), P2Y12 inhibitors ( n = 192,906, 66.3%) and coronary angiography ( n = 161,853, 43.4%). Missed interventions with the strongest impact on reduced survival were coronary angiography (time ratio: 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-0.18), cardiac rehabilitation (time ratio: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.48-0.50), smoking cessation advice (time ratio: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.51-0.57) and statins (time ratio: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.55-0.58). If all eligible patients in the study had received optimal care at the time of guideline publication, then 32,765 (28.9%) deaths (95% CI: 30,531-33,509) may have been prevented.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients hospitalised with NSTEMI missed at least one guideline-indicated intervention for which they were eligible. This was significantly associated with excess mortality. Greater attention to the provision of guideline-indicated care for the management of NSTEMI will reduce premature cardiovascular deaths.

摘要

背景

遵循非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)治疗指南推荐的治疗措施与改善预后相关。我们调查了在一个国家卫生系统中不遵循指南推荐治疗措施的程度及其后果。

方法

使用来自心肌缺血国家审计项目的数据(n = 389,057例NSTEMI患者,n = 247家医院,英格兰和威尔士,2003 - 2013年)进行队列研究(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02436187)。根据指南发布日期,使用加速失效时间模型来量化不遵循治疗措施对生存的影响。

结果

在1,079,044人年的时间里(中位随访2.2年),113,586例(29.2%)NSTEMI患者死亡。在符合接受治疗条件的患者中,337,881例(86.9%)未接受一项或多项指南推荐的干预措施;最常被遗漏的是饮食建议(n = 254,869例,68.1%)、戒烟建议(n = 245,357例,87.9%)、P2Y12抑制剂(n = 192,906例,66.3%)和冠状动脉造影(n = 161,853例,43.4%)。对降低生存率影响最大的遗漏干预措施是冠状动脉造影(时间比:0.18,95%置信区间(CI):0.17 - 0.18)、心脏康复(时间比:0.49,95% CI:0.48 - 0.50)、戒烟建议(时间比:0.53,95% CI:0.51 - 0.57)和他汀类药物(时间比:0.56,95% CI:0.55 - 0.58)。如果研究中的所有符合条件的患者在指南发布时都接受了最佳治疗,那么32,765例(28.9%)死亡(95% CI:30,531 - 33,509)可能会被避免。

结论

大多数因NSTEMI住院的患者至少遗漏了一项他们符合条件的指南推荐干预措施。这与额外的死亡率显著相关。更加关注为NSTEMI管理提供指南推荐的治疗措施将减少心血管疾病过早死亡。

相似文献

1
Excess mortality and guideline-indicated care following non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死后的超额死亡率和指南推荐治疗
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Aug;6(5):412-420. doi: 10.1177/2048872616647705. Epub 2016 May 3.
2
Geographic variation in the treatment of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction in the English National Health Service: a cohort study.英国国民医疗服务体系中非ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗的地域差异:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e011600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011600.
3
Editor's Choice - Impact of initial hospital diagnosis on mortality for acute myocardial infarction: A national cohort study.编辑精选 - 初始医院诊断对急性心肌梗死死亡率的影响:一项全国队列研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Mar;7(2):139-148. doi: 10.1177/2048872616661693. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
4
Statistics on mortality following acute myocardial infarction in 842 897 Europeans.842897 名欧洲人急性心肌梗死后的死亡率统计。
Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Jan 1;116(1):149-157. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz197.
5
The impact of specialist cardiology inpatient care on the long-term outcomes of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): A nationwide cohort study.专科心脏病住院治疗对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)长期预后的影响:一项全国性队列研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 15;423:132990. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.132990. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
6
Impact of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Regionalization Programs on the Treatment and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死区域化治疗方案对诊断为非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗及结局的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):e016932. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016932. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
7
Performance of hospitals according to the ESC ACCA quality indicators and 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the United Kingdom Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) register.根据欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征质量指标评估医院表现及急性心肌梗死的30天死亡率:使用英国心肌缺血国家审计项目(MINAP)登记册的全国队列研究
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 1;38(13):974-982. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx008.
8
Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on the Processes of Care and Long-Term Mortality of Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study and Long-Term Follow-Up.慢性肾脏病对非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者治疗过程和长期死亡率的影响:一项全国性队列研究和长期随访。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e032671. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032671. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
9
Guideline-indicated treatments and diagnostics, GRACE risk score, and survival for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.指南指导的治疗和诊断、GRACE 风险评分与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的生存。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 7;39(42):3798-3806. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy517.
10
Contemporary invasive management and in-hospital outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China: Findings from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry.中国非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的当代有创性治疗和院内结局:来自中国急性心肌梗死注册研究(CAMI)的发现。
Am Heart J. 2019 Sep;215:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the GRACE risk score according to troponin elevation in patients admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a post hoc analysis of the UKGRIS parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中根据肌钙蛋白升高情况评估GRACE风险评分的有效性:UKGRIS平行组整群随机对照试验的事后分析
Open Heart. 2025 Jun 26;12(1):e003213. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003213.
2
Brazilian Society of Cardiology Guidelines: New Norms, New Challenges.巴西心脏病学会指南:新规范,新挑战。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Jun 17;121(6):e20240258. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240258. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectiveness of GRACE risk score in patients admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (UKGRIS): parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial.
GRACE 风险评分在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院治疗中的效果(英国 GRIS 研究):平行组聚类随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2023 Jun 14;381:e073843. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073843.
4
External validation of the GRACE risk score in patients with myocardial infarction in Hungary.GRACE风险评分在匈牙利心肌梗死患者中的外部验证
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Apr 24;46:101210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101210. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Contributions of event rates, pre-hospital deaths, and deaths following hospitalisation to variations in myocardial infarction mortality in 326 districts in England: a spatial analysis of linked hospitalisation and mortality data.英格兰 326 个区的事件发生率、院前死亡和住院后死亡对心肌梗死死亡率变化的影响:基于住院和死亡率相关数据的空间分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Oct;7(10):e813-e824. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00108-6. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
6
Use of a smartphone app to inform healthcare workers of hospital policy during a pandemic such as COVID-19: A mixed methods observational study.利用智能手机应用程序在 COVID-19 等大流行期间向医护人员通报医院政策:一项混合方法观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):e0262105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262105. eCollection 2022.
7
Brazilian Society of Cardiology Guidelines on Unstable Angina and Acute Myocardial Infarction without ST-Segment Elevation - 2021.巴西心脏病学会关于非ST段抬高型不稳定型心绞痛和急性心肌梗死的指南 - 2021年
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Jul;117(1):181-264. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210180.
8
Sex differences in acute cardiovascular care: a review and needs assessment.急危心血管病治疗中的性别差异:综述与需求评估。
Cardiovasc Res. 2022 Feb 21;118(3):667-685. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab063.
9
Prognostic value of GRACE score for in-hospital and 6 months outcomes after non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.GRACE评分对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间及6个月预后的预测价值。
Egypt Heart J. 2021 Mar 6;73(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00146-9.
10
Multimorbidity in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Is Associated With Greater Mortality, Higher Readmission Rates, and Increased Length of Stay: A Systematic Review.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的多种合并症与更高的死亡率、更高的再入院率和更长的住院时间相关:一项系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):E99-E110. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000748.