Xie Cheng-Long, Shao Bei, Chen Jie, Zhou Yi, Lin Shi-Yi, Wang Wen-Wen
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
The center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital &Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Sci Rep. 2016 May 4;6:25285. doi: 10.1038/srep25285.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD). We aim to evaluate the efficacy of GPi (globus pallidus internus), STN (subthalamic nucleus)-DBS and medical therapy for PD. We conducted a systematic review and multiple-treatments meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of neurostimulation and medical therapy for PD patients. Sixteen eligible studies were included in this analysis. We pooled the whole data and found obvious difference between GPi-DBS versus medical therapy and STN-DBS versus medical therapy in terms of UPDRS scores (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale). Meanwhile, we found GPi-DBS had the similar efficacy on the UPDRS scores when compared with STN-DBS. What is more, quality of life, measured by PDQ-39 (Parkinson's disease Questionnaire) showed greater improvement after GPi-DBS than STN-DBS. Five studies showed STN-DBS was more effective for reduction in medication than GPi-DBS. Overall, either GPi-DBS or STN-DBS was an effective technique to control PD patients' symptoms and improved their functionality and quality of life. Meanwhile, the UPDRS scores measuring parkinsonian symptoms revealed no significant difference between GPi-DBS and STN-DBS. STN-DBS was more effective for reduction in medication than GPi-DBS. Alternatively, GPi-DBS was more effective for improving the PDQ-39 score than STN-DBS.
脑深部电刺激术(DBS)是晚期帕金森病(PD)患者的首选外科手术方法。我们旨在评估苍白球内侧部(GPi)、丘脑底核(STN)-DBS以及药物治疗对帕金森病的疗效。我们进行了一项系统评价和多治疗方法的荟萃分析,以研究神经刺激和药物治疗对帕金森病患者的疗效。本分析纳入了16项符合条件的研究。我们汇总了全部数据,发现在统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)评分方面,GPi-DBS与药物治疗之间以及STN-DBS与药物治疗之间存在明显差异。同时,我们发现与STN-DBS相比,GPi-DBS在UPDRS评分上具有相似的疗效。此外,以帕金森病问卷(PDQ-39)衡量的生活质量显示,GPi-DBS术后的改善程度大于STN-DBS。五项研究表明,STN-DBS在减少药物使用方面比GPi-DBS更有效。总体而言,GPi-DBS或STN-DBS都是控制帕金森病患者症状、改善其功能和生活质量的有效技术。同时,测量帕金森症状的UPDRS评分显示,GPi-DBS和STN-DBS之间没有显著差异。STN-DBS在减少药物使用方面比GPi-DBS更有效。或者,GPi-DBS在改善PDQ-39评分方面比STN-DBS更有效。