Nelson Ashley M, Gonzalez Brian D, Jim Heather S L, Cessna Julie M, Sutton Steven K, Small Brent J, Fishman Mayer N, Zachariah Babu, Jacobsen Paul B
Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Oct;24(10):4159-66. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3241-z. Epub 2016 May 3.
Although fatigue is a common problem for men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), there has been little systematic research on this issue. The present study examined changes in fatigue among prostate cancer patients receiving ADT compared to controls and predictors of heightened fatigue in ADT patients.
Prostate cancer patients treated with ADT (ADT+ group, n = 60) completed assessments of fatigue prior to or just after ADT initiation (baseline) and 6 and 12 months later. Prostate cancer patients treated with prostatectomy only (ADT- group, n = 85) and men without cancer (CA- group, n = 86) matched on age and education completed assessments at similar intervals.
Group-by-time interactions for fatigue severity, interference, and duration were observed when comparing the ADT+ group to the controls. Groups did not differ at baseline; however, the ADT+ group reported worse fatigue at 6 and 12 months. The same pattern was observed for changes in the prevalence of clinically meaningful fatigue and the extent of clinically meaningful change in fatigue. Within the ADT+ group, higher baseline comorbidity scores were associated with greater increases in fatigue interference, and higher baseline Gleason scores were associated with greater increases in fatigue duration.
Prostate cancer patients receiving ADT demonstrate a trajectory of worsened fatigue during the first 12 months following treatment initiation relative to the controls. Greater comorbidities and higher Gleason scores at baseline appear to be risk factors for heightened fatigue during the first year following ADT initiation. Results highlight important time points for implementation of interventions aimed at fatigue reduction.
尽管疲劳是接受雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)的前列腺癌男性患者的常见问题,但对此问题的系统性研究较少。本研究比较了接受ADT的前列腺癌患者与对照组之间疲劳程度的变化,并探讨了ADT患者疲劳加剧的预测因素。
接受ADT治疗的前列腺癌患者(ADT+组,n = 60)在ADT开始前或开始后不久(基线)以及6个月和12个月后完成疲劳评估。仅接受前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者(ADT-组,n = 85)和年龄及教育程度匹配的无癌男性(CA-组,n = 86)在相似的时间间隔完成评估。
将ADT+组与对照组进行比较时,观察到疲劳严重程度、干扰程度和持续时间的组间时间交互作用。各组在基线时无差异;然而,ADT+组在6个月和12个月时报告的疲劳情况更严重。在具有临床意义的疲劳患病率变化和疲劳的临床意义变化程度方面也观察到了相同的模式。在ADT+组中,较高的基线合并症评分与疲劳干扰的更大增加相关,较高的基线 Gleason 评分与疲劳持续时间的更大增加相关。
与对照组相比,接受ADT的前列腺癌患者在治疗开始后的前12个月内疲劳情况呈恶化趋势。基线时较高的合并症和较高的Gleason评分似乎是ADT开始后第一年疲劳加剧的危险因素。研究结果突出了实施旨在减轻疲劳的干预措施的重要时间点。