• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息支持项目对前列腺癌患者激素治疗期间自我效能的影响。

The Effect of an Information Support Program on Self-Efficacy of Prostate Cancer Patients during Hormonal Therapy.

作者信息

Yang Rui, Lu Zhenqi, Gu Xiaofeng, Dai Bo

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct 4;8(6):639-652. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon-2138. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.4103/apjon.apjon-2138
PMID:34790848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8522598/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of an information support program on the self-efficacy (SE) of prostate cancer (PCa) patients receiving hormonal therapy (HT).

METHODS

Based on the information support program constructed in a previous study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted in a cancer hospital in Shanghai, China. One hundred subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was provided routine care and communication, and the experimental group participated in an informational support program. Three months later, the following outcomes were compared between the two groups: information acquisition, disease knowledge mastery, SE, healthy behavior adherence, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. -test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare the differences between the two groups, and intention-to-treat analysis was used to increase the reliability of the results.

RESULTS

After the intervention, information acquisition, disease knowledge mastery, and the SE and healthy behavior adherence of the experimental group were significantly increased compared with the control group, whereas the HRQoL and PSA did not significantly differ from that observed in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that information support programs improve information acquisition, disease knowledge mastery, SE, and healthy behavior adherence among PCa patients receiving HT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估信息支持项目对接受激素治疗(HT)的前列腺癌(PCa)患者自我效能(SE)的影响。

方法

基于先前研究构建的信息支持项目,在中国上海的一家癌症医院进行了一项随机对照试验。100名受试者被随机分为两组。对照组接受常规护理和沟通,实验组参与信息支持项目。三个月后,比较两组的以下结果:信息获取、疾病知识掌握、自我效能、健康行为依从性、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平。采用t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验比较两组间差异,并采用意向性分析以提高结果的可靠性。

结果

干预后,实验组的信息获取、疾病知识掌握、自我效能和健康行为依从性与对照组相比显著提高,而健康相关生活质量和PSA与对照组相比无显著差异。

结论

结果表明,信息支持项目可改善接受HT的PCa患者的信息获取、疾病知识掌握、自我效能和健康行为依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/7c6cbf98a193/APJON-8-639-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/ebe71e822e77/APJON-8-639-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/ac24f8dd42ff/APJON-8-639-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/0f870b047084/APJON-8-639-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/7c6cbf98a193/APJON-8-639-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/ebe71e822e77/APJON-8-639-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/ac24f8dd42ff/APJON-8-639-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/0f870b047084/APJON-8-639-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc1/8522598/7c6cbf98a193/APJON-8-639-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of an Information Support Program on Self-Efficacy of Prostate Cancer Patients during Hormonal Therapy.信息支持项目对前列腺癌患者激素治疗期间自我效能的影响。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct 4;8(6):639-652. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon-2138. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
2
Supporting informed decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing on the web: an online randomized controlled trial.在网络上支持关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的明智决策:一项在线随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Aug 6;12(3):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1305.
3
Patients' perceptions and attitudes on recurrent prostate cancer and hormone therapy: Qualitative comparison between decision-aid and control groups.患者对复发性前列腺癌和激素治疗的认知与态度:决策辅助组与对照组的定性比较
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 Sep;8(5):368-373. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.05.006.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using F-PSMA PET/CT.使用F-PSMA PET/CT检测前列腺癌骨和软组织转移方面有更多优势。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第二部分:晚期、复发性和去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
7
A prospective analysis of health-related quality of life in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients managed with intensity modulated radiation therapy, with vs. without hormonal therapy.中高危前列腺癌患者行调强放疗联合与不联合激素治疗的健康相关生活质量的前瞻性分析。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(10):794.e1-794.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Effectiveness of a Blended Care Self-Management Program for Caregivers of People With Early-Stage Dementia (Partner in Balance): Randomized Controlled Trial.针对早期痴呆症患者照料者的混合式护理自我管理项目(平衡伙伴项目)的有效性:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 13;20(7):e10017. doi: 10.2196/10017.
9
Optimizing the Timing of Salvage Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy and the Use of Concurrent Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer.优化前列腺癌根治术后挽救性放疗的时机和同期激素治疗的应用。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Medication Management Program: Adherence, Disease-related Knowledge, Health-related Quality of Life, and Glycemic Control for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.药物管理计划:2型糖尿病的依从性、疾病相关知识、健康相关生活质量及血糖控制
Altern Ther Health Med. 2020 Jul;26(S2):4-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-efficacy centered comprehensive interventions and effects in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer.以自我效能为中心的综合干预措施及其对胃癌根治术患者的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1613280. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1613280. eCollection 2025.
2
Latent profile analysis of fear of cancer recurrence in patients with prostate cancer: Insights into risk factors and psychological interventions.前列腺癌患者癌症复发恐惧的潜在剖面分析:对风险因素和心理干预的见解
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Dec 30;12:100651. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100651. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
Smoking Avoidance, Physical Activity and Diet as Preventative Behaviours for Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Cancer - A Comparison of the Extended Parallel Process Model Groups.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term adherence to GnRH agonists in men with prostate cancer. A nation-wide population-based study in prostate cancer data base Sweden.男性前列腺癌患者长期使用 GnRH 激动剂。基于瑞典前列腺癌数据库的全国性人群研究。
Scand J Urol. 2020 Feb;54(1):20-26. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1702093. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Effects of a Group-Mediated Cognitive Behavioral Lifestyle Intervention on Select Social Cognitive Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy.团体介导的认知行为生活方式干预对接受雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者特定社会认知结局的影响。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735419893764. doi: 10.1177/1534735419893764.
3
避免吸烟、体育活动和饮食作为肺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌的预防行为——扩展平行过程模型组的比较
Int J Public Health. 2025 Feb 4;70:1607278. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1607278. eCollection 2025.
4
Effects on Quality of Life and Self-Efficacy of Instant Messaging Services in Self-Management Programs for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.即时通讯服务对前列腺癌自我管理项目中生活质量和自我效能的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;17(3):465. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030465.
5
Comorbidities And Reducing InEquitieS (CARES): Feasibility of self-monitoring and community health worker support in management of comorbidities among Black breast and prostate cancer patients.合并症与减少不平等(CARES):自我监测及社区卫生工作者支持对黑人乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者合并症管理的可行性研究
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Oct 29;43:101387. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101387. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Predictors of self-care in patients with cancer treated with oral anticancer agents: A systematic review.癌症口服治疗患者自我护理的预测因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 24;19(9):e0307838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307838. eCollection 2024.
7
Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy and Illness Perceptions on Mental Health in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) Randomized Controlled Trial.自我效能感和疾病认知对局限性前列腺癌男性心理健康的中介作用:前列腺癌患者赋权项目(PC-PEP)随机对照试验的二次分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;16(13):2352. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132352.
8
Effectiveness of web-based intervention on reducing symptom burden, improving self-management capabilities and self-efficacy among prostate cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.基于网络的干预对减轻前列腺癌幸存者症状负担、提高自我管理能力和自我效能的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 31;14(5):e082709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082709.
9
Assessing the Efficacy of a 28-Day Comprehensive Online Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) in Facilitating Engagement of Prostate Cancer Patients in Their Survivorship Care: A Qualitative Study.评估 28 天综合在线前列腺癌患者赋权计划(PC-PEP)在促进前列腺癌患者参与生存护理方面的效果:一项定性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 21;30(9):8633-8652. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090626.
10
Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review.支持性护理干预在泌尿系统癌症男性患者中的应用:一项范围综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Aug 21;31(9):530. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0.
Persistence and adherence to androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer: an administrative database study.
前列腺癌男性雄激素剥夺治疗的坚持和依从性:一项行政数据库研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):615-621. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03595-1. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Information needs in cancer patients across the disease trajectory. A prospective study.癌症患者在疾病轨迹中的信息需求。一项前瞻性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Impact on Oncologic Outcomes.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在及其对肿瘤学结局的影响。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.048. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Mechanisms of Physical Activity Behavior Change for Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.体育活动行为改变对前列腺癌幸存者的作用机制:一项聚类随机对照试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Aug 16;52(9):798-808. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax055.
7
[Analysis on the trend of prostate cancer incidence and age change in cancer registration areas of China, 2000 to 2014].[2000年至2014年中国癌症登记地区前列腺癌发病率及年龄变化趋势分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 6;52(6):586-592. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.06.006.
8
Gauging the Effects of Self-efficacy, Social Support, and Coping Style on Self-management Behaviors in Chinese Cancer Survivors.评估自我效能感、社会支持和应对方式对中国癌症幸存者自我管理行为的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2018 Sep/Oct;41(5):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000571.
9
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Cognitive impairment among prostate cancer patients: An overview of reviews.前列腺癌患者的认知障碍:综述概述
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12642. Epub 2017 Feb 7.