• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤科就诊的社会人口学特征差异。

Variation in dermatologist visits by sociodemographic characteristics.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):918-924. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.10.045. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.10.045
PMID:28069298
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to dermatologists is an ongoing concern for Medicaid enrollees. Understanding current use is a key step toward designing and implementing policies to improve access.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to quantify how often Medicaid enrollees visit dermatologists and receive treatment for skin-related conditions compared with patients with other coverage or without health insurance.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of multiyear federal survey data (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey). The sample included Medical Expenditure Panel Survey respondents younger than 65 years from 2008 to 2012.

RESULTS

In unadjusted comparisons, we found that 1.4% of Medicaid enrollees had an ambulatory visit to a dermatologist annually, compared with 1.2% of uninsured individuals and 5.5% of individuals with private coverage. In adjusted models, we found that health insurance source, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and geography are associated with the likelihood of having visits to a dermatologist. Compared with individuals with private coverage, Medicaid enrollees are less likely to receive a diagnosis for a skin condition by any provider and are less than half as likely to have skin-related diagnoses made by dermatologists.

LIMITATIONS

We have relatively few Medical Expenditure Panel Survey respondents for a subset of specific diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings emphasize the need for efforts to reduce disparities in access to dermatologists.

摘要

背景

医疗补助计划的参保者一直难以获得皮肤科医生的服务。了解当前的就诊情况是制定和实施旨在改善医疗服务可及性政策的关键步骤。

目的

我们旨在定量评估与拥有其他保险或没有医疗保险的患者相比,医疗补助计划的参保者看皮肤科医生和接受皮肤相关疾病治疗的频率。

方法

我们对联邦多年调查数据(医疗支出面板调查)进行了回顾性横断面分析。该样本包括 2008 年至 2012 年期间年龄小于 65 岁的医疗支出面板调查受访者。

结果

在未调整的比较中,我们发现,每年有 1.4%的医疗补助计划参保者会去看皮肤科医生,而没有医疗保险的个体比例为 1.2%,私人保险的个体比例为 5.5%。在调整后的模型中,我们发现医疗保险来源、年龄、性别、种族/族裔和地理位置与看皮肤科医生的可能性相关。与拥有私人保险的个体相比,医疗补助计划的参保者更不可能从任何提供者那里获得皮肤疾病的诊断,而由皮肤科医生做出的皮肤相关诊断的可能性不到其一半。

局限性

我们对特定诊断子集的医疗支出面板调查受访者相对较少。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了需要努力减少在获得皮肤科医生服务方面的差异。

相似文献

1
Variation in dermatologist visits by sociodemographic characteristics.皮肤科就诊的社会人口学特征差异。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):918-924. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.10.045. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Effect of Teledermatology on Access to Dermatology Care Among Medicaid Enrollees.远程皮肤病学对医疗补助计划参保者获得皮肤病护理的影响。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):905-12. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0938.
3
Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics With Differences in Use of Outpatient Dermatology Services in the United States.人口统计学和社会经济特征与美国门诊皮肤科服务使用差异的关联。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Nov 1;154(11):1286-1291. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3114.
4
Few Medicaid and uninsured patients are accessing dermatologists.很少有医疗补助计划参保者和未参保患者能看皮肤科医生。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Dec;55(6):1084-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
5
The association between office-based provider visits and emergency department utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries.医疗补助受益人群中基于门诊的医疗服务提供者就诊与急诊部门利用之间的关联。
J Community Health. 2015 Jun;40(3):549-54. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9970-3.
6
Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.父母正在失去医疗补助覆盖的儿童中的未参保情况:俄勒冈州家庭全州范围调查结果
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 2):401-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00764.x.
7
Emergency department visitors and visits: who used the emergency room in 2007?急诊科就诊者与就诊情况:2007年谁使用了急诊室?
NCHS Data Brief. 2010 May(38):1-8.
8
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
9
Health insurance coverage and adverse experiences with physician availability: United States, 2012.医疗保险覆盖范围与就医便利性方面的不良体验:美国,2012年
NCHS Data Brief. 2013 Dec(138):1-8.
10
Disruptions in insurance coverage: patterns and relationship to health care access, unmet need, and utilization before enrollment in the State Children's Health Insurance Program.保险覆盖中断情况:在加入州儿童健康保险计划之前的模式及其与医疗保健可及性、未满足的需求和医疗服务利用情况的关系。
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):e1009-16. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3094.

引用本文的文献

1
Representation of Racially Minoritized Patients on Dermatology Private Practice Websites.皮肤科私人执业网站上少数族裔患者的呈现情况。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Aug;12(4):2409-2412. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02061-6. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities in Skin Cancer in the United States: A Review of Existing Inequities, Contributing Factors, and Potential Solutions.美国皮肤癌方面的种族和族裔医疗差异:对现有不平等现象、促成因素及潜在解决方案的综述
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022 Jul;15(7):16-22.
3
Dermoscopic features of neoplasms in skin of color: A review.
有色人种皮肤肿瘤的皮肤镜特征:综述
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2021 Jan 19;7(2):145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.11.009. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis.儿童特应性皮炎获得治疗机会的变化的影响。
BMC Dermatol. 2020 Dec 20;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12895-020-00114-x.
5
Dermatology-specific and all-cause 30-day and calendar-year readmissions and costs for dermatologic diseases from 2010 to 2014.2010 年至 2014 年皮肤科疾病的皮肤科特定和全因 30 天及全年再入院率和费用。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Sep;81(3):740-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 May 15.
6
Use of Chronic Care Management Codes for Medicare Beneficiaries: a Missed Opportunity?使用慢性护理管理代码为 Medicare 受益人服务:错失的机会?
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1892-1898. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4562-z. Epub 2018 Jul 20.