Schür Remmelt R, Draisma Luc W R, Wijnen Jannie P, Boks Marco P, Koevoets Martijn G J C, Joëls Marian, Klomp Dennis W, Kahn René S, Vinkers Christiaan H
Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Sep;37(9):3337-52. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23244. Epub 2016 May 4.
The inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system is involved in the etiology of most psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). It is therefore not surprising that proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1) H-MRS) is increasingly used to investigate in vivo brain GABA levels. However, integration of the evidence for altered in vivo GABA levels across psychiatric disorders is lacking. We therefore systematically searched the clinical (1) H-MRS literature and performed a meta-analysis. A total of 40 studies (N = 1,591) in seven different psychiatric disorders were included in the meta-analysis: MDD (N = 437), schizophrenia (N = 517), ASD (N = 150), bipolar disorder (N = 129), panic disorder (N = 81), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (N = 104), and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (N = 173). Brain GABA levels were lower in ASD (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.74, P = 0.001) and in depressed MDD patients (SMD = -0.52, P = 0.005), but not in remitted MDD patients (SMD = -0.24, P = 0.310) compared with controls. In schizophrenia this finding did not reach statistical significance (SMD = -0.23, P = 0.089). No significant differences in GABA levels were found in bipolar disorder, panic disorder, PTSD, and ADHD compared with controls. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provided evidence for lower brain GABA levels in ASD and in depressed (but not remitted) MDD patients compared with healthy controls. Findings in schizophrenia were more equivocal. Even though future (1) H-MRS studies could greatly benefit from a longitudinal design and consensus on the preferred analytical approach, it is apparent that (1) H-MRS studies have great potential in advancing our understanding of the role of the GABA system in the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3337-3352, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
抑制性γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)系统参与了包括精神分裂症、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)在内的大多数精神疾病的病因学过程。因此,质子磁共振波谱((1)H-MRS)越来越多地用于研究活体脑内GABA水平也就不足为奇了。然而,目前缺乏关于跨精神疾病活体GABA水平改变的证据整合。因此,我们系统检索了临床(1)H-MRS文献并进行了荟萃分析。荟萃分析纳入了7种不同精神疾病的40项研究(N = 1591):MDD(N = 437)、精神分裂症(N = 517)、ASD(N = 150)、双相情感障碍(N = 129)、惊恐障碍(N = 81)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)(N = 104)以及注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)(N = 173)。与对照组相比,ASD患者(标准化均数差[SMD]= -0.74,P = 0.001)以及抑郁的MDD患者(SMD = -0.52,P = 0.005)脑内GABA水平较低,但缓解期MDD患者(SMD = -0.24,P = 0.310)与对照组相比无差异。在精神分裂症患者中,这一发现未达到统计学显著性(SMD = -0.23,P = 0.089)。与对照组相比,双相情感障碍、惊恐障碍、PTSD以及ADHD患者的GABA水平未发现显著差异。总之,该荟萃分析为ASD患者以及抑郁(而非缓解期)MDD患者脑内GABA水平低于健康对照组提供了证据支持。精神分裂症的研究结果更具不确定性。尽管未来的(1)H-MRS研究可能会从纵向设计以及首选分析方法上的共识中大大受益,但显然(1)H-MRS研究在推进我们对GABA系统在精神疾病发病机制中作用的理解方面具有巨大潜力。《人类大脑图谱》37:3337 - 3352,2016年。© 2016威利期刊公司