Smith David V, Gseir Mouad, Speer Megan E, Delgado Mauricio R
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Aug;37(8):2904-17. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23216. Epub 2016 May 4.
Much of the work in cognitive neuroscience is shifting from a focus on single brain regions to a focus on the connectivity between multiple brain regions. These inter-regional connectivity patterns contribute to a wide range of behaviors and are studied with models of functional integration. The rapid expansion of the literature on functional integration offers an opportunity to scrutinize the consistency and specificity of one of the most popular approaches for quantifying connectivity: psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis. We performed coordinate-based meta-analyses on 284 PPI studies, which allowed us to test (a) whether those studies consistently converge on similar target regions and (b) whether the identified target regions are specific to the chosen seed region and psychological context. Our analyses revealed two key results. First, we found that different types of PPI studies-e.g., those using seeds such as amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and contexts such as emotion and cognitive control, respectively-each consistently converge on similar target regions, thus supporting the reliability of PPI as a tool for studying functional integration. Second, we also found target regions that were specific to the chosen seed region and psychological context, indicating distinct patterns of brain connectivity. For example, the DLPFC seed reliably contributed to a posterior cingulate cortex target during cognitive control but contributed to an amygdala target in other contexts. Our results point to the robustness of PPI while highlighting common and distinct patterns of functional integration, potentially advancing models of brain connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2904-2917, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
认知神经科学的许多工作正在从关注单个脑区转向关注多个脑区之间的连接。这些区域间的连接模式促成了广泛的行为,并通过功能整合模型进行研究。关于功能整合的文献迅速增加,这为审视量化连接性最流行的方法之一——心理生理交互作用(PPI)分析的一致性和特异性提供了契机。我们对284项PPI研究进行了基于坐标的元分析,这使我们能够检验:(a)这些研究是否一致地汇聚于相似的目标区域;(b)所确定的目标区域是否特定于所选的种子区域和心理背景。我们的分析揭示了两个关键结果。首先,我们发现不同类型的PPI研究——例如,分别使用杏仁核和背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)等种子区域以及情绪和认知控制等背景的研究——各自都一致地汇聚于相似的目标区域,从而支持了PPI作为研究功能整合工具的可靠性。其次,我们还发现了特定于所选种子区域和心理背景的目标区域,这表明了不同的脑连接模式。例如,在认知控制期间,DLPFC种子可靠地促成了后扣带回皮层目标,但在其他背景下促成了杏仁核目标。我们的结果表明PPI具有稳健性,同时突出了功能整合的共同和不同模式,可能会推动脑连接模型的发展。《人类大脑图谱》37:2904 - 2917,2016年。© 2016威利期刊公司。