• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Toward a cumulative science of functional integration: A meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions.迈向功能整合的累积科学:心理生理交互作用的元分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Aug;37(8):2904-17. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23216. Epub 2016 May 4.
2
Meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions: Revisiting cluster-level thresholding and sample sizes.心理生理交互作用的元分析:重新审视聚类水平阈值设定和样本量
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jan;38(1):588-591. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23354. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Imperfect (de)convolution may introduce spurious psychophysiological interactions and how to avoid it.不完美的(去)卷积可能会引入虚假的心理生理相互作用以及如何避免它。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1723-1740. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23413. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Time-resolved effective connectivity in task fMRI: Psychophysiological interactions of Co-Activation patterns.时分辨效连接在任务 fMRI 中的研究:共激活模式的心理生理交互作用。
Neuroimage. 2020 May 15;212:116635. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116635. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Task modulated brain connectivity of the amygdala: a meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions.任务调节杏仁核的脑连接性:心理生理交互作用的荟萃分析。
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Jan;222(1):619-634. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1239-4. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Psychophysiological whole-brain network clustering based on connectivity dynamics analysis in naturalistic conditions.基于自然条件下连通性动力学分析的心理生理全脑网络聚类
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Dec;37(12):4654-4672. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23335. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity.行业工具:心理生理交互和功能连接。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Jun;7(5):604-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss055. Epub 2012 May 7.
8
Re-appraisal of negative emotions in cocaine dependence: dysfunctional corticolimbic activation and connectivity.对可卡因成瘾中负面情绪的重新评估:皮质-边缘系统激活和连接功能失调
Addict Biol. 2014 May;19(3):415-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00497.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
9
Age-related changes in amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotional face processing from childhood into young adulthood.从童年到青年期情绪面孔加工过程中杏仁核与额叶连接的年龄相关变化。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 May;37(5):1684-95. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23129. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Evoked itch perception is associated with changes in functional brain connectivity.诱发的瘙痒感知与大脑功能连接的变化有关。
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Dec 3;7:213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.12.002. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Older Adults Show Altered Network Connectivity during Fairness Decisions with Similar and Dissimilar Partners.老年人在与相似和不相似伙伴进行公平决策时表现出网络连接的改变。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 18:2025.08.13.670194. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.13.670194.
2
Which software packages did researchers use to meta-analyze fMRI data? A literature survey from 2019 to 2024.研究人员使用了哪些软件包来对功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据进行荟萃分析?2019年至2024年的文献调查。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 10;19:1580808. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1580808. eCollection 2025.
3
Trait reward sensitivity and behavioral motivation shape connectivity between the default mode network and the striatum during reward anticipation.特质奖励敏感性和行为动机在奖励预期期间塑造了默认模式网络与纹状体之间的连接。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 7:2025.04.17.649386. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.17.649386.
4
Comparison of whole-brain task-modulated functional connectivity methods for fMRI task connectomics.用于功能磁共振成像任务连接组学的全脑任务调制功能连接方法比较
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 14:2024.01.22.576622. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.22.576622.
5
Comparison of whole-brain task-modulated functional connectivity methods for fMRI task connectomics.全脑任务调制功能连接方法在 fMRI 任务连接组学中的比较。
Commun Biol. 2024 Oct 26;7(1):1402. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07088-3.
6
Trait reward sensitivity modulates connectivity with the temporoparietal junction and Anterior Insula during strategic decision making.特质奖励敏感性在战略决策过程中调节与颞顶联合区和前脑岛的连接。
Biol Psychol. 2024 Oct;192:108857. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108857. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
7
Amygdala fMRI-A Critical Appraisal of the Extant Literature.杏仁核功能磁共振成像——对现有文献的批判性评价
Neurosci Insights. 2024 Aug 13;19:26331055241270591. doi: 10.1177/26331055241270591. eCollection 2024.
8
Corticostriatal responses to social reward are linked to trait reward sensitivity and subclinical substance use in young adults.纹状体对社会奖励的反应与年轻人的特质奖励敏感性和亚临床物质使用有关。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Jun 17;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae033.
9
Connectivity analyses for task-based fMRI.基于任务的 fMRI 的连通性分析。
Phys Life Rev. 2024 Jul;49:139-156. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2024.04.012. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Disrupted network interactions serve as a neural marker of dyslexia.网络交互紊乱可作为诵读困难的神经标记物。
Commun Biol. 2023 Nov 3;6(1):1114. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05499-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinct Reward Properties are Encoded via Corticostriatal Interactions.通过皮质纹状体相互作用编码不同的奖励属性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 2;6:20093. doi: 10.1038/srep20093.
2
Amplitude-modulated stimuli reveal auditory-visual interactions in brain activity and brain connectivity.振幅调制刺激揭示了大脑活动和大脑连通性中的视听交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 2;6:1440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01440. eCollection 2015.
3
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
4
Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic?复制的期望:你的现实吗?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 May;9(3):305-18. doi: 10.1177/1745691614528518.
5
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.科学标准。促进开放的研究文化。
Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374.
6
Test-retest reliability of dynamic causal modeling for fMRI.功能磁共振成像动态因果建模的重测信度。
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.040. Epub 2015 May 22.
7
Meta-analytic connectivity and behavioral parcellation of the human cerebellum.人类小脑的荟萃分析连接性与行为分区
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:327-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
The effects of attention on the temporal integration of multisensory stimuli.注意力对多感官刺激时间整合的影响。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2015 Apr 23;9:32. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00032. eCollection 2015.
9
In search of a human self-regulation system.寻找人类自我调节系统。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:389-411. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014243. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
10
Functional connectivity with distinct neural networks tracks fluctuations in gain/loss framing susceptibility.与不同神经网络的功能连接跟踪收益/损失框架易感性的波动。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Jul;36(7):2743-55. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22804. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

迈向功能整合的累积科学:心理生理交互作用的元分析。

Toward a cumulative science of functional integration: A meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions.

作者信息

Smith David V, Gseir Mouad, Speer Megan E, Delgado Mauricio R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Aug;37(8):2904-17. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23216. Epub 2016 May 4.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.23216
PMID:27145472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4945436/
Abstract

Much of the work in cognitive neuroscience is shifting from a focus on single brain regions to a focus on the connectivity between multiple brain regions. These inter-regional connectivity patterns contribute to a wide range of behaviors and are studied with models of functional integration. The rapid expansion of the literature on functional integration offers an opportunity to scrutinize the consistency and specificity of one of the most popular approaches for quantifying connectivity: psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis. We performed coordinate-based meta-analyses on 284 PPI studies, which allowed us to test (a) whether those studies consistently converge on similar target regions and (b) whether the identified target regions are specific to the chosen seed region and psychological context. Our analyses revealed two key results. First, we found that different types of PPI studies-e.g., those using seeds such as amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and contexts such as emotion and cognitive control, respectively-each consistently converge on similar target regions, thus supporting the reliability of PPI as a tool for studying functional integration. Second, we also found target regions that were specific to the chosen seed region and psychological context, indicating distinct patterns of brain connectivity. For example, the DLPFC seed reliably contributed to a posterior cingulate cortex target during cognitive control but contributed to an amygdala target in other contexts. Our results point to the robustness of PPI while highlighting common and distinct patterns of functional integration, potentially advancing models of brain connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2904-2917, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

认知神经科学的许多工作正在从关注单个脑区转向关注多个脑区之间的连接。这些区域间的连接模式促成了广泛的行为,并通过功能整合模型进行研究。关于功能整合的文献迅速增加,这为审视量化连接性最流行的方法之一——心理生理交互作用(PPI)分析的一致性和特异性提供了契机。我们对284项PPI研究进行了基于坐标的元分析,这使我们能够检验:(a)这些研究是否一致地汇聚于相似的目标区域;(b)所确定的目标区域是否特定于所选的种子区域和心理背景。我们的分析揭示了两个关键结果。首先,我们发现不同类型的PPI研究——例如,分别使用杏仁核和背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)等种子区域以及情绪和认知控制等背景的研究——各自都一致地汇聚于相似的目标区域,从而支持了PPI作为研究功能整合工具的可靠性。其次,我们还发现了特定于所选种子区域和心理背景的目标区域,这表明了不同的脑连接模式。例如,在认知控制期间,DLPFC种子可靠地促成了后扣带回皮层目标,但在其他背景下促成了杏仁核目标。我们的结果表明PPI具有稳健性,同时突出了功能整合的共同和不同模式,可能会推动脑连接模型的发展。《人类大脑图谱》37:2904 - 2917,2016年。© 2016威利期刊公司。