Khan Aarlenne Z, Munoz Douglas P, Takahashi Naomi, Blohm Gunnar, McPeek Robert M
J Vis. 2016 May 1;16(7):5. doi: 10.1167/16.7.5.
Previous studies have shown that the influence of a behaviorally irrelevant distractor on saccade reaction times (SRTs) varies depending on the temporal and spatial relationship between the distractor and the saccade target. We measured distractor influence on SRTs to a subsequently presented target, varying the spatial location and the timing between the distractor and the target. The distractor appeared at one of four equally eccentric locations, followed by a target (either 50 ms or 200 ms after) at one of 136 different locations encompassing an area of 20° square. We extensively tested two humans and two monkeys on this task to determine interspecies similarities and differences, since monkey neurophysiology is often used to interpret human behavioral findings. Results were similar across species; for the short interval (50 ms), SRTs were shortest to a target presented close to or at the distractor location and increased primarily as a function of the distance from the distractor. There was also an effect of distractor-target direction and visual field. For the long interval (200 ms) the results were inverted; SRTs were longest for short distances between the distractor and target and decreased as a function of distance from distractor. Both SRT patterns were well captured by a two-dimensional dynamic field model with short-distance excitation and long-distance inhibition, based upon known functional connectivity found in the superior colliculus that includes wide-spread excitation and inhibition. Based on these findings, we posit that the different time-dependent patterns of distractor-related SRTs can emerge from the same underlying neuronal mechanisms common to both species.
先前的研究表明,行为上不相关的干扰物对扫视反应时间(SRTs)的影响会因干扰物与扫视目标之间的时间和空间关系而有所不同。我们测量了干扰物对随后呈现目标的SRTs的影响,改变了干扰物与目标之间的空间位置和时间间隔。干扰物出现在四个等偏心率位置之一,随后在包含20°见方区域的136个不同位置之一出现目标(在干扰物出现后50毫秒或200毫秒)。我们对两个人和两只猴子进行了广泛的这项任务测试,以确定种间的异同,因为猴子神经生理学常被用于解释人类行为学发现。不同物种的结果相似;在短间隔(50毫秒)时,对于出现在靠近干扰物位置或干扰物所在位置的目标,SRTs最短,并且主要随着与干扰物距离的增加而增加。干扰物 - 目标方向和视野也有影响。在长间隔(200毫秒)时结果相反;干扰物与目标之间距离短时SRTs最长,并且随着与干扰物距离的增加而减小。基于上丘中已知的功能连接,即包括广泛的兴奋和抑制,具有短距离兴奋和长距离抑制的二维动态场模型很好地捕捉了这两种SRT模式。基于这些发现,我们假定与干扰物相关的SRTs的不同时间依赖性模式可能源自这两个物种共有的相同潜在神经元机制。