Suppr超能文献

一项关于当前医生在医学院入学能力测试(UKCAT)修改版中表现的横断面研究。

A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors' Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT.

作者信息

Blackmur James P, Lone Nazir I, Stone Oliver D, Webb David J, Dhaun Neeraj

机构信息

From the University/British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence (JPB, DJW, ND); Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh (NIL); and Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (ODS), Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(18):e3506. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003506.

Abstract

The 2-hour long United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is used by many universities in the United Kingdom as part of their selection process for undergraduate medical and dentistry degrees. We aimed to compare the performance of senior doctors in primary and secondary care and across a range of specialties, in a modified version of the medical school entrance examination-the mUKCAT. Lay people were also included in the study. Despite its widespread use, this is the first study that examines the performance of senior clinicians in the UKCAT.The study used a prospective cross-sectional design. It used mock questions from the UKCAT website to generate an mUKCAT that was anticipated to take 15 minutes to complete. In all, 167 doctors at consultant, general practitioner (GP), or specialty trainee grade and 26 lay people took part.The overall mean mUKCAT score of all participants was 2486 (69.1%). Of the total cohort, 126 (65.3%) scored above our designated threshold of 2368 and were deemed to have passed the mUKCAT. Excluding lay people, 113 (67.7%) of the 167 doctors scored above that threshold. Medical specialty was associated with overall score (P = 0.003), with anesthetists/intensive care physicians scoring highest (n = 20, mean score 2660) and GPs scoring lowest (n = 38, mean score 2302). Academics outperformed nonacademics (mean score of academics, n = 44 vs nonacademics, n = 123: 2750 vs 2406; P < 0.001). Those clinicians in senior management positions scored lower than those in "standard" roles (mean score of senior management, n = 31 vs standard roles, n = 136: 2332 vs 2534, mean difference 202, 95% confidence interval 67-337, P = 0.004).In the situational judgement section, there was no evidence that specialty was associated with score (P = 0.15). Academics exhibited greater situational judgement than their nonacademic colleagues (academics vs nonacademics: 69.8 vs 63.6%; P = 0.01).The majority of senior clinicians passed our mUKCAT. Academics and anesthetists were found to be the best performers, with GPs and those in senior management positions performing the worst.

摘要

英国临床能力测试(UKCAT)时长为两小时,英国许多大学将其作为本科医学和牙科学位选拔过程的一部分。我们旨在比较初级和二级医疗领域以及一系列专科的资深医生在医学院入学考试的改良版——mUKCAT中的表现。研究中还纳入了非专业人士。尽管UKCAT被广泛使用,但这是第一项考察英国资深临床医生在UKCAT中表现的研究。

该研究采用前瞻性横断面设计。它使用了UKCAT网站上的模拟问题来生成预计需要15分钟完成的mUKCAT。共有167名顾问医生、全科医生(GP)或专科培训医生以及26名非专业人士参与。

所有参与者的mUKCAT总体平均分数为2486(69.1%)。在整个队列中,126人(65.3%)的分数高于我们设定的2368分的阈值,被视为通过了mUKCAT。排除非专业人士后,167名医生中有113人(67.7%)得分高于该阈值。医学专科与总分相关(P = 0.003),麻醉师/重症监护医生得分最高(n = 20,平均分数2660),全科医生得分最低(n = 38,平均分数2302)。学者的表现优于非学者(学者平均分数,n = 44对比非学者,n = 123:2750对比2406;P < 0.001)。担任高级管理职位的临床医生得分低于担任“标准”职位的医生(高级管理职位平均分数,n = 31对比标准职位,n = 136:2332对比2534,平均差异202,95%置信区间67 - 337,P = 0.004)。

在情境判断部分,没有证据表明专科与分数相关(P = 0.15)。学者比非学者同事表现出更强的情境判断能力(学者对比非学者:69.8%对比63.6%;P = 0.01)。

大多数资深临床医生通过了我们的mUKCAT。研究发现学者和麻醉师表现最佳,全科医生和担任高级管理职位的医生表现最差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969f/4863766/bc0a455d0e6a/medi-95-e3506-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验