Suppr超能文献

静脉注射利多卡因在胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:一项随机、双盲、对照研究。

Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasm: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study.

作者信息

Kim Ji Eun, Choi Jong Bum, Koo Bon-Nyeo, Jeong Hae Won, Lee Byung Ho, Kim So Yeon

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon (JEK, JBC, HWJ, BHL), and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Severance Hospital, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul (BNK, SYK), Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(18):e3593. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003593.

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapy for early gastric neoplasm and requires sedation with adequate analgesia. Lidocaine is a short-acting local anesthetic, and intravenous lidocaine has been shown to have analgesic efficacy in surgical settings. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of intravenous lidocaine on analgesic and sedative requirements for ESD and pain after ESD.Sixty-six patients scheduled for ESD randomly received either intravenous lidocaine as a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg before sedation, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 2 mg/kg/h during sedation (lidocaine group; n = 33) or the same bolus and infusion volumes of normal saline (control group; n = 33). Sedation was achieved with propofol and fentanyl. The primary outcome was fentanyl requirement during ESD. We recorded hemodynamics and any events during ESD and evaluated post-ESD epigastric and throat pain.Fentanyl requirement during ESD reduced by 24% in the lidocaine group compared with the control group (105 ± 28 vs. 138 ± 37 μg, mean ± SD; P < 0.001). The lidocaine group reached sedation faster [40 (20-100) vs. 55 (30-120) s, median (range); P = 0.001], and incidence of patient movement during ESD decreased in the lidocaine group (3% vs. 26%, P = 0.026). Numerical rating scale for epigastric pain was significantly lower at 6 hours after ESD [2 (0-6) vs. 3 (0-8), median (range); P = 0.023] and incidence of throat pain was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (27% vs. 65%, P = 0.003). No adverse events associated with lidocaine were discovered.Administration of intravenous lidocaine reduced fentanyl requirement and decreased patient movement during ESD. Moreover, it alleviated epigastric and throat pain after ESD. Thus, we conclude that the use of intravenous adjuvant lidocaine is a new and safe sedative method during ESD.

摘要

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是早期胃癌的一种先进治疗方法,需要进行充分镇痛的镇静。利多卡因是一种短效局部麻醉剂,静脉注射利多卡因已被证明在手术环境中有镇痛效果。本研究的目的是评估静脉注射利多卡因对ESD镇痛和镇静需求以及ESD后疼痛的影响。

66例计划接受ESD的患者在镇静前随机接受1.5mg/kg静脉推注利多卡因,随后在镇静期间以2mg/kg/h的速率持续输注(利多卡因组;n = 33)或相同推注量和输注量的生理盐水(对照组;n = 33)。使用丙泊酚和芬太尼进行镇静。主要结局是ESD期间的芬太尼需求量。我们记录了ESD期间的血流动力学和任何事件,并评估了ESD后的上腹部和咽喉疼痛。

与对照组相比,利多卡因组ESD期间的芬太尼需求量减少了24%(105±28 vs. 138±37μg,均值±标准差;P < 0.001)。利多卡因组达到镇静的速度更快[40(20 - 100)vs. 55(30 - 120)s,中位数(范围);P = 0.001],且利多卡因组ESD期间患者移动的发生率降低(3% vs. 26%,P = 0.026)。ESD后6小时上腹部疼痛的数字评分量表显著更低[2(0 - 6)vs. 3(0 - 8),中位数(范围);P = 0.023],且利多卡因组咽喉疼痛的发生率显著更低(27% vs. 65%,P = 0.003)。未发现与利多卡因相关的不良事件。

静脉注射利多卡因减少了ESD期间的芬太尼需求量并减少了患者移动。此外,它减轻了ESD后的上腹部和咽喉疼痛。因此,我们得出结论,静脉注射辅助利多卡因是ESD期间一种新的安全镇静方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dafc/4863806/9a3bd0af6f50/medi-95-e3593-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验