Pearman John K, Anlauf Holger, Irigoien Xabier, Carvalho Susana
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Mar Environ Res. 2016 Jul;118:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
Coral reefs harbor the most diverse assemblages in the ocean, however, a large proportion of the diversity is cryptic and, therefore, undetected by standard visual census techniques. Cryptic and exposed communities differ considerably in species composition and ecological function. This study compares three different coral reef assessment protocols: i) visual benthic reef surveys: ii) visual census of Autonomous Reef Monitoring Structures (ARMS) plates; and iii) metabarcoding techniques of the ARMS (including sessile, 106-500 μm and 500-2000 μm size fractions), that target the cryptic and exposed communities of three reefs in the central Red Sea. Visual census showed a dominance of Cnidaria (Anthozoa) and Rhodophyta on the reef substrate, while Porifera, Bryozoa and Rhodophyta were the most abundant groups on the ARMS plates. Metabarcoding, targeting the 18S rRNA gene, significantly increased estimates of the species diversity (p < 0.001); revealing that Annelida were generally the dominant phyla (in terms of reads) of all fractions and reefs. Furthermore, metabarcoding detected microbial eukaryotic groups such as Syndiniophyceae, Mamiellophyceae and Bacillariophyceae as relevant components of the sessile fraction. ANOSIM analysis showed that the three reef sites showed no differences based on the visual census data. Metabarcoding showed a higher sensitivity for identifying differences between reef communities at smaller geographic scales than standard visual census techniques as significant differences in the assemblages were observed amongst the reefs. Comparison of the techniques showed no similar patterns for the visual techniques while the metabarcoding of the ARMS showed similar patterns amongst fractions. Establishing ARMS as a standard tool in reef monitoring will not only advance our understanding of local processes and ecological community response to environmental changes, as different faunal components will provide complementary information but also improve the estimates of biodiversity in coral reef benthic communities. This study lays the foundations for further studies looking at integrating traditional reef survey methodologies with complementary approaches, such as metabarcoding, which investigate other components of the reef community.
珊瑚礁拥有海洋中最多样化的生物群落,然而,很大一部分生物多样性是隐匿的,因此,用标准的目视普查技术无法检测到。隐匿群落和暴露群落在物种组成和生态功能上有很大差异。本研究比较了三种不同的珊瑚礁评估方案:i)目视底栖珊瑚礁调查;ii)自主礁体监测结构(ARMS)板的目视普查;iii)ARMS的元条形码技术(包括固着生物、106 - 500微米和500 - 2000微米大小分级),这些技术针对红海中部三个珊瑚礁的隐匿群落和暴露群落。目视普查显示,珊瑚礁基质上刺胞动物门(珊瑚纲)和红藻占主导地位,而多孔动物门、苔藓虫纲和红藻是ARMS板上数量最多的类群。针对18S rRNA基因的元条形码技术显著提高了物种多样性的估计值(p < 0.001);揭示出环节动物门通常是所有分级和珊瑚礁中(就读数而言)的优势门类。此外,元条形码技术检测到诸如共生甲藻纲、玛氏藻纲和硅藻纲等微生物真核生物类群是固着生物分级的相关组成部分。ANOSIM分析表明,根据目视普查数据,这三个珊瑚礁地点没有差异。元条形码技术在识别较小地理尺度上珊瑚礁群落之间的差异方面比标准目视普查技术具有更高的灵敏度,因为在各珊瑚礁之间观察到了群落的显著差异。技术比较表明,目视技术没有相似的模式,而ARMS的元条形码技术在各分级之间显示出相似的模式。将ARMS确立为珊瑚礁监测的标准工具,不仅将推进我们对当地过程以及生态群落对环境变化的响应的理解,因为不同的动物群落组成部分将提供补充信息,还将改善对珊瑚礁底栖生物群落生物多样性的估计。本研究为进一步研究奠定了基础,这些研究旨在将传统的珊瑚礁调查方法与诸如元条形码技术等补充方法相结合,后者用于研究珊瑚礁群落的其他组成部分。