Suppr超能文献

大残余体积而非低填充密度是脑动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞术后再通的最具影响力的危险因素。

Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.

作者信息

Sadato Akiyo, Hayakawa Motoharu, Adachi Kazuhide, Nakahara Ichiro, Hirose Yuichi

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake City, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 May 6;11(5):e0155062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155062. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%-25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is determined by aneurysm volume and packing density may be more important risk factor for recanalization. To validate this hypothesis, we analyzed the factors affecting the outcomes of treated aneurysms at our institute.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We included 355 small and large aneurysms. The following six factors were obtained from every case: aneurysm volume (mL), neck size (mm), packing density (%), residual volume (mL), rupture status at presentation, and stent assistance (with or without stent). The data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant risk factors for recanalization. Recanalization occurred in 61 aneurysms (17.2%). Significant predictors for recanalization were aneurysm volume (odds ratio, 15.3; P < 0.001) and residual volume (odds ratio, 30.9; P < 0.001), but not packing density (odds ratio, 0.98; P = 0.341). These results showed that for each 0.1-mL increase in aneurysm volume and residual volume, the risk of recanalization increased by 1.3 times and 1.4 times, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization was residual volume, not packing density. The larger the aneurysm volume, the greater the packing density has to be to minimize the residual volume and risk of recanalization. Since tight coil packing has already been aimed, further innovation of coil property or embolization technique may be needed. Otherwise, different treatment modality such as flow diverter or parent artery occlusion may have to be considered.

摘要

背景

已知紧密的弹簧圈填充,密度至少为20%-25%,对于预防脑动脉瘤栓塞后再通很重要。然而,大型动脉瘤有时无论填充密度如何都会再通,这表明由动脉瘤体积和填充密度决定的绝对残余体积可能是再通更重要的危险因素。为了验证这一假设,我们分析了我院治疗动脉瘤的预后影响因素。

方法与结果

我们纳入了355个小型和大型动脉瘤。从每个病例中获取以下六个因素:动脉瘤体积(mL)、瘤颈大小(mm)、填充密度(%)、残余体积(mL)、就诊时的破裂状态以及支架辅助(有或无支架)。然后对数据进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定再通的显著危险因素。61个动脉瘤(17.2%)发生了再通。再通的显著预测因素是动脉瘤体积(比值比,15.3;P<0.001)和残余体积(比值比,30.9;P<0.001),而不是填充密度(比值比,0.98;P = 0.341)。这些结果表明,动脉瘤体积和残余体积每增加0.1 mL,再通风险分别增加1.3倍和1.4倍。

结论

弹簧圈栓塞后再通的最有影响的危险因素是残余体积,而不是填充密度。动脉瘤体积越大,为使残余体积和再通风险最小化所需的填充密度就越大。由于已经致力于紧密的弹簧圈填充,可能需要进一步创新弹簧圈特性或栓塞技术。否则,可能不得不考虑不同的治疗方式,如血流导向装置或载瘤动脉闭塞。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Experimental Study of Coil Compaction: Impact of Pulsatile Stress.线圈压实的实验研究:脉动应力的影响
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2022;16(1):12-18. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2021-0023. Epub 2021 May 7.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验