Sadato Akiyo, Hayakawa Motoharu, Adachi Kazuhide, Nakahara Ichiro, Hirose Yuichi
Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake City, Aichi, Japan.
PLoS One. 2016 May 6;11(5):e0155062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155062. eCollection 2016.
Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%-25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is determined by aneurysm volume and packing density may be more important risk factor for recanalization. To validate this hypothesis, we analyzed the factors affecting the outcomes of treated aneurysms at our institute.
We included 355 small and large aneurysms. The following six factors were obtained from every case: aneurysm volume (mL), neck size (mm), packing density (%), residual volume (mL), rupture status at presentation, and stent assistance (with or without stent). The data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant risk factors for recanalization. Recanalization occurred in 61 aneurysms (17.2%). Significant predictors for recanalization were aneurysm volume (odds ratio, 15.3; P < 0.001) and residual volume (odds ratio, 30.9; P < 0.001), but not packing density (odds ratio, 0.98; P = 0.341). These results showed that for each 0.1-mL increase in aneurysm volume and residual volume, the risk of recanalization increased by 1.3 times and 1.4 times, respectively.
The most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization was residual volume, not packing density. The larger the aneurysm volume, the greater the packing density has to be to minimize the residual volume and risk of recanalization. Since tight coil packing has already been aimed, further innovation of coil property or embolization technique may be needed. Otherwise, different treatment modality such as flow diverter or parent artery occlusion may have to be considered.
已知紧密的弹簧圈填充,密度至少为20%-25%,对于预防脑动脉瘤栓塞后再通很重要。然而,大型动脉瘤有时无论填充密度如何都会再通,这表明由动脉瘤体积和填充密度决定的绝对残余体积可能是再通更重要的危险因素。为了验证这一假设,我们分析了我院治疗动脉瘤的预后影响因素。
我们纳入了355个小型和大型动脉瘤。从每个病例中获取以下六个因素:动脉瘤体积(mL)、瘤颈大小(mm)、填充密度(%)、残余体积(mL)、就诊时的破裂状态以及支架辅助(有或无支架)。然后对数据进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定再通的显著危险因素。61个动脉瘤(17.2%)发生了再通。再通的显著预测因素是动脉瘤体积(比值比,15.3;P<0.001)和残余体积(比值比,30.9;P<0.001),而不是填充密度(比值比,0.98;P = 0.341)。这些结果表明,动脉瘤体积和残余体积每增加0.1 mL,再通风险分别增加1.3倍和1.4倍。
弹簧圈栓塞后再通的最有影响的危险因素是残余体积,而不是填充密度。动脉瘤体积越大,为使残余体积和再通风险最小化所需的填充密度就越大。由于已经致力于紧密的弹簧圈填充,可能需要进一步创新弹簧圈特性或栓塞技术。否则,可能不得不考虑不同的治疗方式,如血流导向装置或载瘤动脉闭塞。