Minen Mia Tova, Torous John, Raynowska Jenelle, Piazza Allison, Grudzen Corita, Powers Scott, Lipton Richard, Sevick Mary Ann
Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 240 East 38th Street 20th floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
NYU Langone Headache Center, Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Headache Pain. 2016;17:51. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0608-y. Epub 2016 May 10.
There is increasing interest in using electronic behavioral interventions as well as mobile technologies such as smartphones for improving the care of chronic disabling diseases such as migraines. However, less is known about the current clinical evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of such behavioral interventions.
To review the published literature of behavioral interventions for primary headache disorders delivered by electronic means suitable for use outside of the clinician's office.
An electronic database search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase was conducted through December 11, 2015. All eligible studies were systematically reviewed to examine the modality in which treatment was delivered (computer, smartphone, watch and other), types of behavioral intervention delivered (cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], biofeedback, relaxation, other), the headache type being treated, duration of treatment, adherence, and outcomes obtained by the trials to examine the overall feasibility of electronic behavioral interventions for headache.
Our search produced 291 results from which 23 eligible articles were identified. Fourteen studies used the internet via the computer, 2 used Personal Digital Assistants, 2 used CD ROM and 5 used other types of devices. None used smartphones or wearable devices. Four were pilot studies (N ≤ 10) which assessed feasibility. For the behavioral intervention, CBT was used in 11 (48 %) of the studies, relaxation was used in 8 (35 %) of the studies, and biofeedback was used in 5 (22 %) of the studies. The majority of studies (14/23, 61 %) used more than one type of behavioral modality. The duration of therapy ranged from 4-8 weeks for CBT with a mean of 5.9 weeks. The duration of other behavioral interventions ranged from 4 days to 60 months. Outcomes measured varied widely across the individual studies.
Despite the move toward individualized medicine and mHealth, the current literature shows that most studies using electronic behavioral intervention for the treatment of headache did not use mobile devices. The studies examining mobile devices showed that the behavioral interventions that employed them were acceptable to patients. Data are limited on the dose required, long term efficacy, and issues related to the security and privacy of this health data. This study was registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015032284) (Prospero, 2015).
人们越来越关注使用电子行为干预措施以及智能手机等移动技术来改善偏头痛等慢性致残性疾病的治疗。然而,对于此类行为干预措施的可行性和有效性的当前临床证据了解较少。
回顾以电子方式提供的、适用于临床医生办公室之外使用的原发性头痛疾病行为干预的已发表文献。
通过对PubMed、PsycINFO和Embase进行电子数据库检索,检索截至2015年12月11日的文献。对所有符合条件的研究进行系统评价,以检查治疗实施的方式(计算机、智能手机、手表及其他)、所提供的行为干预类型(认知行为疗法[CBT]、生物反馈、放松训练、其他)、所治疗的头痛类型、治疗持续时间、依从性以及试验获得的结果,以检验电子行为干预对头痛治疗的总体可行性。
我们的检索产生了291条结果,从中确定了23篇符合条件的文章。14项研究通过计算机使用互联网,2项使用个人数字助理,2项使用光盘只读存储器,5项使用其他类型的设备。没有研究使用智能手机或可穿戴设备。4项为评估可行性的初步研究(N≤10)。对于行为干预,11项研究(48%)使用了CBT,8项研究(35%)使用了放松训练,5项研究(22%)使用了生物反馈。大多数研究(14/23,61%)使用了不止一种行为方式。CBT的治疗持续时间为4至8周,平均为5.9周。其他行为干预的持续时间从4天到60个月不等。各研究中测量的结果差异很大。
尽管朝着个性化医疗和移动健康发展,但当前文献表明,大多数使用电子行为干预治疗头痛的研究并未使用移动设备。研究移动设备的研究表明,采用这些设备的行为干预措施为患者所接受。关于所需剂量、长期疗效以及与这些健康数据的安全性和隐私相关的问题,数据有限。本研究已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库PROSPERO(CRD42015032284)(Prospero,2015)注册。