Rolff Jens, Schmid-Hempel Paul
Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Strasse 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), 14195 Berlin, Germany.
ETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), ETH-Zentrum CHN, Universitätsstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 May 26;371(1695). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0297.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are important elements of the innate immune defence in multicellular organisms that target and kill microbes. Here, we reflect on the various points that are raised by the authors of the 11 contributions to a special issue of Philosophical Transactions on the 'evolutionary ecology of arthropod antimicrobial peptides'. We see five interesting topics emerging. (i) AMP genes in insects, and perhaps in arthropods more generally, evolve much slower than most other immune genes. One explanation refers to the constraints set by AMPs being part of a finely tuned defence system. A new view argues that AMPs are under strong stabilizing selection. Regardless, this striking observation still invites many more questions than have been answered so far. (ii) AMPs almost always are expressed in combinations and sometimes show expression patterns that are dependent on the infectious agent. While it is often assumed that this can be explained by synergistic interactions, such interactions have rarely been demonstrated and need to be studied further. Moreover, how to define synergy in the first place remains difficult and needs to be addressed. (iii) AMPs play a very important role in mediating the interaction between a host and its mutualistic or commensal microbes. This has only been studied in a very small number of (insect) species. It has become clear that the very same AMPs play different roles in different situations and hence are under concurrent selection. (iv) Different environments shape the physiology of organisms; especially the host-associated microbial communities should impact on the evolution host AMPs. Studies in social insects and some organisms from extreme environments seem to support this notion, but, overall, the evidence for adaptation of AMPs to a given environment is scant. (v) AMPs are considered or already developed as new drugs in medicine. However, bacteria can evolve resistance to AMPs. Therefore, in the light of our limited understanding of AMP evolution in the natural context, and also the very limited understanding of the evolution of resistance against AMPs in bacteria in particular, caution is recommended. What is clear though is that study of the ecology and evolution of AMPs in natural systems could inform many of these outstanding questions, including those related to medical applications and pathogen control.This article is part of the themed issue 'Evolutionary ecology of arthropod antimicrobial peptides'.
抗菌肽(AMPs)是多细胞生物先天性免疫防御的重要组成部分,可靶向并杀死微生物。在此,我们思考了《哲学汇刊》关于“节肢动物抗菌肽的进化生态学”特刊中11篇论文的作者提出的各种观点。我们发现了五个有趣的主题。(i)昆虫中的AMP基因,或许更普遍地说节肢动物中的AMP基因,其进化速度比大多数其他免疫基因要慢得多。一种解释是,AMP作为精细调节防御系统的一部分受到了限制。一种新观点认为,AMP处于强烈的稳定选择之下。无论如何,这一显著观察结果引发的问题远比目前已解答的要多得多。(ii)AMP几乎总是以组合形式表达,有时其表达模式还依赖于感染因子。虽然人们通常认为这可以用协同相互作用来解释,但这种相互作用很少得到证实,需要进一步研究。此外,首先如何定义协同作用仍然很困难,需要加以解决。(iii)AMP在介导宿主与其共生或共栖微生物之间的相互作用中起着非常重要的作用。这仅在极少数(昆虫)物种中得到研究。很明显,同样的AMP在不同情况下发挥着不同的作用,因此处于并行选择之下。(iv)不同的环境塑造了生物体的生理机能;尤其是与宿主相关的微生物群落应该会影响宿主AMP的进化。对社会性昆虫和一些来自极端环境的生物体的研究似乎支持这一观点,但总体而言,AMP适应特定环境的证据很少。(v)AMP在医学上被视为或已被开发为新药。然而,细菌可以进化出对AMP的抗性。因此,鉴于我们对自然环境中AMP进化的了解有限,尤其是对细菌中AMP抗性进化的了解非常有限,建议谨慎行事。不过很明显的是,对自然系统中AMP的生态学和进化的研究可以为许多这些悬而未决的问题提供信息,包括那些与医学应用和病原体控制相关的问题。本文是主题为“节肢动物抗菌肽的进化生态学”特刊的一部分。