Department of Nursing, University of Maine School of Nursing, Orono, Maine.
Department of Nursing, Regis College, Weston, Massachusetts.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 May;64(5):944-58. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14129. Epub 2016 May 10.
To systematically identify, appraise, and summarize research on the effects of behavioral interventions to prevent cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults using a holistic wellness framework.
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials that tested the effectiveness of behavioral interventions within each of the six dimensions of wellness: occupational, social, intellectual, physical, emotional and spiritual. Databases searched included PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ALOIS, and The Grey Literature Report through July 1, 2014.
Community.
Individuals aged 60 and older (N = 6,254).
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Checklist.
Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions in the physical dimension of wellness were most common (11 studies); interventions in the spiritual dimension were least common (0 studies). Fifty-nine different measures were used to measure multiple cognitive domains, with memory being the most commonly measured (17 studies) and language being the least commonly measured (5 studies). Fifty percent of the interventions examined in the 18 studies demonstrated statistically significant outcomes on at least one cognitive measure. Interventions in the intellectual dimension that examined cognitively stimulating activities using pen and paper or a computer represented the greatest percentage of statistically significant outcomes.
Intellectual and physical interventions were most studied, with varied results. Future research is needed using more-consistent methods to measure cognition. Researchers should include the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery among measurement tools to facilitate effective data harmonization, pooling, and comparison.
采用整体健康框架系统地识别、评价和总结针对社区居住的老年人进行认知衰退预防的行为干预的效果的研究。
对每个健康维度(职业、社会、智力、身体、情感和精神)中进行的行为干预的有效性进行测试的随机对照试验的系统综述。检索的数据库包括 PubMed MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、PsycINFO、CINAHL、ALOIS 和 2014 年 7 月 1 日之前的灰色文献报告。
社区。
年龄在 60 岁及以上的个体(N=6254)。
综合报告标准清单。
符合纳入标准的研究有 18 项。身体维度的干预最常见(11 项研究);精神维度的干预最不常见(0 项研究)。有 59 种不同的措施用于测量多个认知领域,其中记忆是最常测量的(17 项研究),语言是最不常测量的(5 项研究)。18 项研究中 50%的干预在至少一项认知测量上显示出统计学显著的结果。使用纸笔或计算机进行认知刺激活动的智力维度的干预代表了最大比例的统计学显著结果。
智力和身体干预研究最多,但结果各不相同。未来的研究需要使用更一致的方法来测量认知。研究人员应将 NIH 工具包认知电池纳入测量工具中,以促进有效的数据协调、汇总和比较。