Mondal Bhaskar, Neese Frank, Ye Shengfa
Max-Planck Institut für Chemische Energiekonversion , Stiftstraße 34-36, D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Inorg Chem. 2016 Jun 6;55(11):5438-44. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00471. Epub 2016 May 10.
Carbon dioxide functionalization attracts much interest due to the current environmental and energy challenges. Our earlier work (Mondal, B.; Neese, F.; Ye, S. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 7192-7198) demonstrated that CO2 hydrogenation mediated by base metal catalysts M(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph)) (M = Co(III) and Fe(II), n = 1, 2; PP3(Ph) = tris(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)phosphine) features discrete rate-determining steps (RDSs). Specifically, the reaction with Co(III)(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph)) passes through a hydride-transfer RDS, whereas the conversion with Fe(II)(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph)) traverses a H2-splitting RDS. More importantly, we found that the nature and barrier of the RDS likely correlate with the hydride affinity or hydricity of the dihydride intermediate M(H)2(PP3(Ph)) generated by H2-splitting. In the present contribution, following this notion we design a series of potential Fe(II) and Co(III) catalysts, for which the respective dihydride species possess differential hydricities, and computationally investigated their reactivity toward CO2 hydrogenation. Our results reveal that lowering the hydrictiy of Co(III)(H)2(PP3(Ph)) by introducing anionic anchors in PP3(Ph) dramatically decreases the hydride-transfer RDS barrier, as shown for the enhanced reactivity of Co(H)(η(2)-H2)(CP3(Ph)) and Co(H)(η(2)-H2)(SiP3(Ph)) (CP3(Ph) = tris(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)methyl, SiP3(Ph) = tris(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)silyl), while the same ligand modification increases the H2-splitting RDS barriers for [Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(CP3(Ph))] and [Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(SiP3(Ph))] relative to that for Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph)). Conversely, upon increasing the hydricity of [Fe(II)(H)2(PP3(Ph))] by adding an electron-withdrawing group to PP3(Ph), the transformation with Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(PhNO2)) (PP3(PhNO2) = tris(2-(diphenylphosphino)-4-nitrophenyl)phosphine) is predicted to encounter a lower barrier for H2-splitting and a higher barrier for hydride transfer than those for Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph)). Thus, we have shown that hydricity can be used as a guide to direct the rational design and development of more efficient catalysts.
由于当前的环境和能源挑战,二氧化碳功能化引起了广泛关注。我们早期的工作(蒙达尔,B;内斯,F;叶,S。《无机化学》2015年,第54卷,7192 - 7198页)表明,由贱金属催化剂M(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph))(M = Co(III)和Fe(II),n = 1, 2;PP3(Ph) = 三(2-(二苯基膦基)苯基)膦)介导的CO2氢化具有离散的速率决定步骤(RDSs)。具体而言,与Co(III)(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph))的反应经过一个氢化物转移RDS,而与Fe(II)(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph))的转化则经过一个H2分裂RDS。更重要的是,我们发现RDS的性质和势垒可能与H2分裂产生的二氢化物中间体[M(H)2(PP3(Ph))]((n - 1)+)的氢化物亲和力或酸度相关。在本论文中,基于这一概念,我们设计了一系列潜在的Fe(II)和Co(III)催化剂,其各自的二氢化物物种具有不同的酸度,并通过计算研究了它们对CO2氢化的反应活性。我们的结果表明,通过在PP3(Ph)中引入阴离子锚来降低Co(III)(H)2(PP3(Ph))的酸度,会显著降低氢化物转移RDS的势垒,如Co(H)(η(2)-H2)(CP3(Ph))和Co(H)(η(2)-H2)(SiP3(Ph))(CP3(Ph) = 三(2-(二苯基膦基)苯基)甲基,SiP3(Ph) = 三(2-(二苯基膦基)苯基)硅基)的反应活性增强所示;而相同的配体修饰相对于Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph))增加了[Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(CP3(Ph))]和[Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(SiP3(Ph))]的H2分裂RDS势垒。相反,通过向PP3(Ph)中添加吸电子基团来增加[Fe(II)(H)2(PP3(Ph))]的酸度,预计Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(PhNO2))(PP3(PhNO2) = 三(2-(二苯基膦基)-4-硝基苯基)膦)的转化在H2分裂方面会遇到比Fe(H)(η(2)-H2)(PP3(Ph))更低的势垒,而在氢化物转移方面会遇到更高的势垒。因此,我们已经表明酸度可以作为指导,用于合理设计和开发更高效的催化剂。