Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 May 4;53(2):497-503. doi: 10.3233/JAD-151130.
In patients with symptomatic cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), cerebrovascular reactivity to visual stimuli is reduced. Lobar microbleeds are a diagnostic hallmark of CAA, but are also highly prevalent in asymptomatic individuals. Recent data suggest that the latter group might have CAA.
We investigated whether cerebrovascular reactivity is impaired in asymptomatic individuals with lobar microbleeds.
From the population-based Rotterdam Study, we invited 35 participants with lobar microbleeds and 15 age-matched controls (all≥55 years) for functional MRI (fMRI) as part of the Early Detection of Angiopathy Network (EDAN) Study. Cerebrovascular reactivity parameters (i.e., amplitude and time to peak responses) were assessed in response to visual stimulation using fMRI. Student's t-test and linear regression were used to compare fMRI parameters in participants with and without microbleeds.
Amplitude and time to peak responses did not differ between participants with and without microbleeds (respectively, p = 0.179 and p = 0.555). Participants with microbleeds had slightly higher amplitude responses compared to participants without microbleeds. After excluding individuals with mixed microbleeds (i.e., lobar and non-lobar microbleeds), we found no significant difference in cerebrovascular reactivity for persons with a single microbleed or multiple microbleeds compared to persons without microbleeds.
In the general population, lobar microbleeds may not relate to impaired cerebrovascular reactivity. In asymptomatic individuals, lobar microbleeds may either reflect less advanced CAA pathology insufficient to cause functional vascular impairment, or reflect vascular pathology other than CAA.
在有症状性脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)的患者中,对视觉刺激的脑血管反应性降低。脑叶微出血是 CAA 的诊断标志,但在无症状个体中也高度普遍存在。最近的数据表明,后者可能存在 CAA。
我们研究了有无脑叶微出血的无症状个体的脑血管反应性是否受损。
我们从基于人群的鹿特丹研究中邀请了 35 名有脑叶微出血的参与者和 15 名年龄匹配的对照者(均≥55 岁)参加功能磁共振成像(fMRI)作为早期血管病变检测网络(EDAN)研究的一部分。使用 fMRI 评估了脑血管反应性参数(即幅度和达到峰值时间的反应)对视觉刺激的反应。学生 t 检验和线性回归用于比较有无微出血的参与者的 fMRI 参数。
有微出血和无微出血的参与者之间的幅度和达到峰值时间的反应没有差异(分别为 p = 0.179 和 p = 0.555)。有微出血的参与者的幅度反应略高于无微出血的参与者。在排除混合微出血(即脑叶和非脑叶微出血)的个体后,我们发现有单一微出血或多个微出血的人与无微出血的人相比,脑血管反应性没有显著差异。
在一般人群中,脑叶微出血可能与脑血管反应性受损无关。在无症状个体中,脑叶微出血可能反映了不太严重的 CAA 病理学,不足以导致功能血管损害,或者反映了除 CAA 以外的血管病理学。