Alberga A S, Pickering B J, Alix Hayden K, Ball G D C, Edwards A, Jelinski S, Nutter S, Oddie S, Sharma A M, Russell-Mayhew S
Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Libraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Clin Obes. 2016 Jun;6(3):175-88. doi: 10.1111/cob.12147.
Innovative and coordinated strategies to address weight bias among health professionals are urgently needed. We conducted a systematic literature review of empirical peer-reviewed published studies to assess the impact of interventions designed to reduce weight bias in students or professionals in a health-related field. Combination sets of keywords based on three themes (1: weight bias/stigma; 2: obesity/overweight; 3: health professional) were searched within nine databases. Our search yielded 1447 individual records, of which 17 intervention studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 15) included medical, dietetic, health promotion, psychology and kinesiology students, while the minority included practicing health professionals (n = 2). Studies utilized various bias-reduction strategies. Many studies had methodological weaknesses, including short assessment periods, lack of randomization, lack of control group and small sample sizes. Although many studies reported changes in health professionals' beliefs and knowledge about obesity aetiology, evidence of effectiveness is poor, and long-term effects of intervention strategies on weight bias reduction remain unknown. The findings highlight the lack of experimental research to reduce weight bias among health professionals. Although changes in practice will likely require multiple strategies in various sectors, well-designed trials are needed to test the impact of interventions to decrease weight bias in healthcare settings.
迫切需要创新和协调的策略来解决卫生专业人员中的体重偏见问题。我们对已发表的实证同行评审研究进行了系统的文献综述,以评估旨在减少健康相关领域学生或专业人员体重偏见的干预措施的影响。在九个数据库中搜索了基于三个主题(1:体重偏见/污名;2:肥胖/超重;3:卫生专业人员)的关键词组合集。我们的搜索产生了1447条单独记录,其中17项干预研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究(n = 15)包括医学、营养学、健康促进、心理学和运动机能学专业的学生,少数研究包括执业卫生专业人员(n = 2)。研究采用了各种减少偏见的策略。许多研究存在方法学上的弱点,包括评估期短、缺乏随机化、缺乏对照组和样本量小。尽管许多研究报告了卫生专业人员对肥胖病因的信念和知识有所改变,但有效性证据不足,干预策略对减少体重偏见的长期影响仍然未知。研究结果凸显了在减少卫生专业人员体重偏见方面缺乏实验性研究。尽管实践中的改变可能需要各部门采取多种策略,但仍需要精心设计的试验来测试干预措施对减少医疗环境中体重偏见的影响。