Varshney Anubodh, Watson Ryan A, Noll Andrew, Im KyungAh, Rossi Jeffrey, Shah Pinak, Giugliano Robert P
Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Cardiol Ther. 2018 Jun;7(1):71-77. doi: 10.1007/s40119-018-0111-4. Epub 2018 May 19.
Optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear. We evaluated the association between antithrombotic regimens and outcomes in TAVR patients.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at a single academic center from April 2009 to March 2014. Antithrombotic regimens were classified as single or dual antiplatelet therapy (AP), single antiplatelet plus anticoagulant (SAC), or triple therapy (TT). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained with best subset variable selection methods using bootstrap resampling.
Of 246 patients who underwent TAVR, 241 were eligible for analysis with 133, 88, and 20 patients in the AP, SAC, and TT groups, respectively. During a median 2.1-year follow-up, 53.5% had at least one endpoint-the most common was death (68%), followed by major bleeding (23%), stroke (6%), and MI (3%). At 2 years, the composite outcome occurred in 70% of TT, 42% of SAC, and 31% of AP patients. Compared to AP, adjusted HRs for the composite outcome were 2.88 [95% Confidence intervals (CI) (1.61-5.16); p = 0.0004] and 1.66 (95% CI [1.13-2.42]; p = 0.009) in the TT and SAC groups, respectively. Mortality rates at 2 years were 61% in the TT, 32% in the SAC, and 26% in the AP groups (p = 0.005).
The risk of the composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding at 2-year follow-up was significantly higher in TAVR patients treated with TT or SAC versus AP, even after multivariate adjustment.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后最佳的抗栓治疗方案仍不明确。我们评估了TAVR患者抗栓方案与预后之间的关联。
我们回顾性分析了2009年4月至2014年3月在单一学术中心接受TAVR的连续患者。抗栓方案分为单药或双联抗血小板治疗(AP)、单药抗血小板加抗凝治疗(SAC)或三联治疗(TT)。主要终点是死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、卒中及大出血的复合终点。采用自助重抽样的最佳子集变量选择方法获得调整后的风险比(HR)。
在246例行TAVR的患者中,241例符合分析条件,其中AP组、SAC组和TT组分别有133例、88例和20例。在中位2.1年的随访期间,53.5%的患者至少发生了一个终点事件,最常见的是死亡(68%),其次是大出血(23%)、卒中(6%)和MI(3%)。在2年时,复合终点事件在TT组患者中的发生率为70%,SAC组为42%,AP组为31%。与AP组相比,TT组和SAC组复合终点事件的调整后HR分别为2.88 [95%置信区间(CI)(1.61 - 5.16);p = 0.0004]和1.66(95% CI [1.13 - 2.42];p = 0.009)。2年时的死亡率在TT组为61%,SAC组为32%,AP组为26%(p = 0.005)。
即使经过多变量调整,接受TT或SAC治疗的TAVR患者在2年随访时发生死亡、MI、卒中或大出血复合终点事件的风险显著高于接受AP治疗的患者。