• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物体与空间意象的生动性。

Vividness of Object and Spatial Imagery.

作者信息

Blazhenkova Olesya

机构信息

Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Apr;122(2):490-508. doi: 10.1177/0031512516639431.

DOI:10.1177/0031512516639431
PMID:27166329
Abstract

Vividness is one of the fundamental characteristics of visual mental imagery. The first research goal was to examine whether vividness that refer to imagery of pictorial object (color, texture, or shape) versus spatial (three dimensional structure, location, or mechanism) properties constitute separate vividness dimensions. The second goal was to develop a vividness questionnaire separately assessing dimensions of imagery vividness. In Study 1, 111 students (M age = 21.8 years, SD = 1.3) evaluated the vividness of imagery evoked by nine object and nine spatial items from the pilot version of the new Vividness of Object and Spatial Imagery (VOSI) questionnaire, completed a self-report assessment of object and spatial imagery, and rated their aptitudes in art and science. Analysis indicated that imagery vividness comprised object and spatial dimensions. Object vividness items were positively associated with the self-report measure and ratings of artistic abilities, whereas spatial vividness items were positively associated with self-report measure and ratings of science abilities. In Study 2, an independent sample of 205 students (M age = 21 years, SD = 1.7) completed the second version of the VOSI, art and science aptitude ratings, and a number of self-report and performance measures assessing object and spatial imagery. Object and spatial imagery vividness items loaded on factors with 28 retained items; this two-factor vividness model fit the data better than a unidimensional vividness model. The questionnaire had satisfactory Cronbach's α for object vividness scale (.88) and for spatial vividness scale (.85). Correlational analyses supported convergent and discriminative validity of the VOSI. While object imagery vividness and spatial imagery vividness share some underlying vividness variance, they are dissociated into separate dimensions.

摘要

生动性是视觉心理意象的基本特征之一。第一个研究目标是考察,涉及图画对象(颜色、纹理或形状)意象与空间(三维结构、位置或机制)属性的生动性是否构成不同的生动性维度。第二个目标是编制一份生动性问卷,分别评估意象生动性的维度。在研究1中,111名学生(年龄中位数 = 21.8岁,标准差 = 1.3)对新的物体与空间意象生动性(VOSI)问卷试行版中的九个物体项目和九个空间项目所唤起意象的生动性进行了评估,完成了一份关于物体和空间意象的自我报告评估,并对自己在艺术和科学方面的能力进行了评分。分析表明,意象生动性包括物体和空间维度。物体生动性项目与自我报告测量以及艺术能力评分呈正相关,而空间生动性项目与自我报告测量以及科学能力评分呈正相关。在研究2中,205名学生(年龄中位数 = 21岁,标准差 = 1.7)的独立样本完成了VOSI的第二版、艺术和科学能力评分,以及一些评估物体和空间意象的自我报告和表现测量。物体和空间意象生动性项目在由28个保留项目组成的因素上负荷;这个双因素生动性模型比单维生动性模型更能拟合数据。该问卷在物体生动性量表(.88)和空间生动性量表(.85)上具有令人满意的克朗巴哈α系数。相关分析支持了VOSI的聚合效度和区分效度。虽然物体意象生动性和空间意象生动性共享一些潜在的生动性方差,但它们被区分为不同的维度。

相似文献

1
Vividness of Object and Spatial Imagery.物体与空间意象的生动性。
Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Apr;122(2):490-508. doi: 10.1177/0031512516639431.
2
Internal consistency and construct validity of two versions of the Revised Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.修订版视觉表象清晰度问卷两个版本的内部一致性和结构有效性。
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Oct;113(2):454-60. doi: 10.2466/04.22.PMS.113.5.454-460.
3
The relationship between self-reports of imagery and spatial ability.表象的自我报告与空间能力之间的关系。
Br J Psychol. 2003 May;94(Pt 2):245-73. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661912.
4
Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire.评估心理意象的生动程度:普利茅斯感觉意象问卷。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):547-63. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12050. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations.视触空间表象的物体和空间意象维度。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Sep;213(2-3):267-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2623-1. Epub 2011 Mar 19.
6
Domain-specific reports of visual imagery vividness are not related to perceptual expertise.特定领域的视觉意象生动性报告与感知专业知识无关。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):733-738. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0730-4.
7
Vividness of Visual Imagery Depends on the Neural Overlap with Perception in Visual Areas.视觉意象的生动程度取决于与视觉区域感知的神经重叠。
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1367-1373. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
8
Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects.直视内心之眼:引导和评估想象鲜明度调节想象感知一致性效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):862-869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01868-8. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
9
Some psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale.听觉意象清晰度量表西班牙语版本的一些心理测量特性。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Aug;109(1):139-46. doi: 10.2466/04.08.24.PR0.109.4.139-146.
10
Read and Imagine: Visual Imagery Experience Evoked by First versus Second Language.阅读与想象:第一语言与第二语言唤起的视觉意象体验
Psychol Rep. 2025 Apr;128(2):1067-1100. doi: 10.1177/00332941231158059. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Why indecisive trials matter: Improving the binocular rivalry imagery priming score for the assessment of aphantasia.为何犹豫不决的试验很重要:提高用于评估想象障碍的双眼竞争意象启动分数。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 4;57(9):248. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02780-6.
2
Divergent mechanisms of perceptual reversals in spinning and wobbling structure-from-motion stimuli.旋转和摆动运动视差刺激中视错觉反转的不同机制。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 21;19(2):e0297963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297963. eCollection 2024.
3
Priming and reversals of the perceived ambiguous orientation of a structure-from-motion shape and relation to personality traits.
结构运动形状的感知歧义方向的启动和反转,以及与人格特质的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 26;17(8):e0273772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273772. eCollection 2022.
4
Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties.意象能力评估:心理测量学特性的跨学科系统综述和质量评估。
BMC Med. 2022 May 2;20(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02295-3.
5
Boundary Extension in Face Processing.面部处理中的边界扩展
Iperception. 2017 Sep 12;8(5):2041669517724808. doi: 10.1177/2041669517724808. eCollection 2017 Sep-Oct.
6
Individual differences in visualization and childhood play preferences.视觉化方面的个体差异与儿童时期的游戏偏好。
Heliyon. 2020 Jun 10;6(6):e03953. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03953. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Participatory Environmentally Friendly Message Design: Influence of Message Features and User Characteristics.参与式环保信息设计:信息特征和用户特征的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 20;17(4):1353. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041353.
8
Mental Images and School Learning: A Longitudinal Study on Children.心理意象与学校学习:一项关于儿童的纵向研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 18;10:2034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02034. eCollection 2019.
9
The format of mental imagery: from a critical review to an integrated embodied representation approach.心理意象的形式:从批判性综述到整合的具身表征方法
Cogn Process. 2019 Aug;20(3):277-289. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00908-z. Epub 2019 Feb 23.