Blazhenkova Olesya, Booth Robert W
Sabanci University, Turkey.
Heliyon. 2020 Jun 10;6(6):e03953. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03953. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Our research explored the structure of childhood visual play preferences, and examined different types of visual play in relation to individual differences in visualization and aptitudes in academic specializations requiring visualization skills. Principal component analysis dissociated visual-object play (e.g., exploring drawing media or decorative crafts) from visual-spatial play (e.g., assembling and disassembling mechanisms or playing with construction toys) preferences. Moreover, visual play preferences were dissociated from verbal play preferences (e.g., vocabulary games or making up stories). The structure of visual play preferences was consistent with object and spatial dimensions of individual differences in visualization. Visual-object and visual-spatial dimensions of play preferences were differentially related to measures of object visualization (processing pictorial appearances in terms of shape, texture, and color) versus spatial visualization (processing spatial relationships and spatial manipulations), as well as to aptitudes in artistic versus scientific domains. Furthermore, our research sheds new light on sex differences in play behavior: Previous studies commonly associated gender-specific play with visual versus verbal-social processing; our research demonstrated sex differences in play preferences across the two dimensions of visual play, where females preferred visual-object and males preferred visual-spatial play. Moreover, we found the object vs. spatial structure of visual play preferences was largely the same in both sexes, suggesting that differences in visual play preferences cannot be reduced to sex differences. Also, our questionnaire assessing visual-object, visual-spatial and verbal play preferences, developed for research purposes, demonstrated good reliability. Its two scales, assessing visual-object and visual-spatial play preferences, discriminatively correlated with assessments of individual differences in object and spatial visualization, respectively. This research creates a basis for further creation of comprehensive measures of visual play preferences, and should stimulate future studies examining visual play preferences and how they may create developmental opportunities for skills and preferences lasting into adulthood.
我们的研究探索了儿童视觉游戏偏好的结构,并考察了不同类型的视觉游戏与可视化方面的个体差异以及需要可视化技能的学术专业领域中的能力倾向之间的关系。主成分分析将视觉对象游戏(例如,探索绘画媒介或装饰工艺)与视觉空间游戏(例如,组装和拆卸机械装置或玩建筑玩具)的偏好区分开来。此外,视觉游戏偏好与言语游戏偏好(例如,词汇游戏或编造故事)也有所不同。视觉游戏偏好的结构与可视化方面个体差异的对象和空间维度一致。游戏偏好的视觉对象和视觉空间维度与对象可视化(根据形状、纹理和颜色处理图像外观)与空间可视化(处理空间关系和空间操作)的测量指标以及艺术领域与科学领域的能力倾向存在差异关联。此外,我们的研究为游戏行为中的性别差异提供了新的见解:以往研究通常将特定性别的游戏与视觉与言语 - 社交处理联系起来;我们的研究表明,在视觉游戏的两个维度上,游戏偏好存在性别差异,其中女性更喜欢视觉对象游戏,而男性更喜欢视觉空间游戏。此外,我们发现视觉游戏偏好的对象与空间结构在两性中大致相同,这表明视觉游戏偏好的差异不能简单归结为性别差异。而且,我们为研究目的开发的评估视觉对象、视觉空间和言语游戏偏好的问卷具有良好的信度。其评估视觉对象和视觉空间游戏偏好的两个量表分别与对象和空间可视化方面个体差异的评估具有显著相关性。这项研究为进一步创建全面的视觉游戏偏好测量方法奠定了基础,并应激发未来对视觉游戏偏好及其如何为持续到成年期的技能和偏好创造发展机会的研究。