Hiller Rachel M, Meiser-Stedman Richard, Fearon Pasco, Lobo Sarah, McKinnon Anna, Fraser Abigail, Halligan Sarah L
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;57(8):884-98. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12566. Epub 2016 May 12.
Understanding the natural course of child and adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has significant implications for the identification of, and intervention for, at-risk youth. We used a meta-analytic approach to examine longitudinal changes in youth PTSD prevalence and symptoms over the first 12 months posttrauma.
We conducted a systematic review to identify longitudinal studies of PTSD in young people (5-18 years old), excluding treatment trials. The search yielded 27 peer-reviewed studies and one unpublished dataset for analysis of pooled prevalence estimates, relative prevalence reduction and standardised mean symptom change. Key moderators were also explored, including age, proportion of boys in the sample, initial prevalence of PTSD and PTSD measurement type.
Analyses demonstrated moderate declines in PTSD prevalence and symptom severity over the first 3-6 months posttrauma. From 1 to 6 months posttrauma, the prevalence of PTSD reduced by approximately 50%. Symptoms also showed moderate decline, particularly across the first 3 months posttrauma. There was little evidence of further change in prevalence or symptom severity after 6 months, suggesting that it is unlikely a child would lose a PTSD diagnosis without intervention beyond this point.
The current findings provide key information about the likelihood of posttrauma recovery in the absence of intervention and have important implications for our understanding of child and adolescent PTSD. Results are discussed with reference to the timing of PTSD screening and the potential role of early interventions. Findings particularly highlight the importance of future research to develop our understanding of what factors prevent the action of normal recovery from the 'acute' posttrauma period.
了解儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的自然病程对于识别高危青少年并对其进行干预具有重要意义。我们采用荟萃分析方法,研究创伤后前12个月青少年PTSD患病率和症状的纵向变化。
我们进行了一项系统综述,以识别关于5至18岁青少年PTSD的纵向研究,不包括治疗试验。检索得到27项经同行评审的研究和一个未发表的数据集,用于分析合并患病率估计值、相对患病率降低情况和标准化平均症状变化。还探讨了关键的调节因素,包括年龄、样本中男孩的比例、PTSD的初始患病率和PTSD测量类型。
分析表明,创伤后前3至6个月,PTSD患病率和症状严重程度有适度下降。创伤后1至6个月,PTSD患病率降低了约50%。症状也有适度下降,尤其是在创伤后前3个月。6个月后,患病率或症状严重程度几乎没有进一步变化的证据,这表明如果没有干预,儿童在此之后不太可能失去PTSD诊断。
目前的研究结果提供了关于在无干预情况下创伤后恢复可能性的关键信息,对我们理解儿童和青少年PTSD具有重要意义。结合PTSD筛查的时机和早期干预的潜在作用对结果进行了讨论。研究结果特别强调了未来研究的重要性,以加深我们对哪些因素会阻止从“急性”创伤后时期正常恢复的理解。