Ganguli Arijit, Clewell Jerry, Shillington Alicia C
Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Medical Affairs, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 28;10:711-25. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S101175. eCollection 2016.
Patient support programs (PSPs), including medication management and counseling, have the potential to improve care in chronic disease states with complex therapies. Little is known about the program's effects on improving clinical, adherence, humanistic, and cost outcomes.
To conduct a targeted review describing medical conditions in which PSPs have been implemented; support delivery components (eg, face-to-face, phone, mail, and internet); and outcomes associated with implementation.
MEDLINE - 10 years through March 2015 with supplemental handsearching of reference lists.
English-language trials and observational studies of PSPs providing at minimum, counseling for medication management, measurement of ≥1 clinical outcome, and a 3-month follow-up period during which outcomes were measured.
Program characteristics and related clinical, adherence, humanistic, and cost outcomes were abstracted. Study quality and the overall strength of evidence were reviewed using standard criteria.
Of 2,239 citations, 64 studies met inclusion criteria. All targeted chronic disease processes and the majority (48 [75%]) of programs offered in-clinic, face-to-face support. All but 9 (14.1%) were overseen by allied health care professionals (eg, nurses, pharmacists, paraprofessionals). Forty-one (64.1%) reported at least one significantly positive clinical outcome. The most frequent clinical outcome impacted was adherence, where 27 of 41 (66%) reported a positive outcome. Of 42 studies measuring humanistic outcomes (eg, quality of life, functional status), 27 (64%) reported significantly positive outcomes. Only 15 (23.4%) programs reported cost or utilization-related outcomes, and, of these, 12 reported positive impacts.
The preponderance of evidence suggests a positive impact of PSPs on adherence, clinical and humanistic outcomes. Although less often measured, health care utilization and costs are also reduced following PSP implementation. Further research is needed to better quantify which support programs, delivery methods, and components offer the greatest value for any particular medical condition.
患者支持项目(PSP),包括药物管理和咨询,有潜力改善采用复杂疗法的慢性病状态的护理。关于该项目对改善临床、依从性、人文和成本结果的影响,人们了解甚少。
进行一项有针对性的综述,描述已实施PSP的医疗状况;支持提供组件(如面对面、电话、邮件和互联网);以及与实施相关的结果。
通过2015年3月前10年的MEDLINE以及对参考文献列表的补充手工检索。
PSP的英文试验和观察性研究,至少提供药物管理咨询、≥1项临床结果的测量以及为期3个月的随访期,在此期间测量结果。
提取项目特征以及相关的临床、依从性、人文和成本结果。使用标准标准审查研究质量和证据的总体强度。
在2239篇文献中,64项研究符合纳入标准。所有目标慢性病过程以及大多数(48项[75%])项目提供门诊面对面支持。除9项(14.1%)外,所有项目均由专职医疗保健专业人员(如护士、药剂师、辅助专业人员)监督。41项(64.1%)报告了至少一项显著的积极临床结果。受影响最频繁的临床结果是依从性,41项中有27项(66%)报告了积极结果。在42项测量人文结果(如生活质量、功能状态)的研究中,27项(64%)报告了显著的积极结果。只有15项(23.4%)项目报告了成本或利用相关结果,其中12项报告了积极影响。
大量证据表明PSP对依从性、临床和人文结果有积极影响。虽然测量较少,但PSP实施后医疗保健利用和成本也会降低。需要进一步研究以更好地量化哪些支持项目、提供方式和组件对任何特定医疗状况具有最大价值。