生物疗法治疗重度哮喘患者的患者支持计划的影响:系统文献回顾和间接治疗比较。
Impact of patient support programmes among patients with severe asthma treated with biological therapies: a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison.
机构信息
AstraZeneca UK Limited, Cambridge, UK
Imperial College London, London, London, UK.
出版信息
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 2;11(1):e001799. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001799.
INTRODUCTION
Effective treatment of severe asthma requires patient adherence to inhaled and biological medications. Previous work has shown that patient support programmes (PSP) can improve adherence in patients with chronic diseases, but the impact of PSPs in patients with severe asthma treated with biologics has not been thoroughly investigated.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature review to understand the impact of PSPs on treatment adherence, asthma control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with severe asthma. Embase, MEDLINE and EconLit databases were searched for studies published from 2003 (the year of the first biological approval for severe asthma) to June 2023 that described PSP participation among patients with severe asthma on biological treatment. Direct pooling of outcomes was not possible due to the heterogeneity across studies, so an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was performed to determine the effect of PSP participation on treatment discontinuation. The ITC used patient-level data from patients treated with benralizumab either enrolled in a PSP (VOICE study, Connect 360 PSP) or not enrolled in a PSP (Benralizumab Patient Access Programme study) in the UK.
FINDINGS
25 records of 21 studies were selected. Six studies investigated the impact of PSPs on treatment adherence, asthma control or HRQoL. All six studies reported positive outcomes for patients enrolled in PSPs; the benefits of each PSP were closely linked to the services provided. The ITC showed that patients in the Connect 360 PSP group were less likely to discontinue treatment compared with the non-PSP group (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
PSPs contribute to positive clinical outcomes in patients with severe asthma on biological treatment. Future analyses will benefit from thorough descriptions of PSP services, and study designs that allow direct comparisons of patient outcomes with and without a PSP.
简介
严重哮喘的有效治疗需要患者坚持使用吸入性和生物药物。先前的研究表明,患者支持计划(PSP)可以提高慢性病患者的依从性,但 PSP 对接受生物制剂治疗的严重哮喘患者的影响尚未得到彻底研究。
方法
我们进行了系统的文献综述,以了解 PSP 对接受生物制剂治疗的严重哮喘患者的治疗依从性、哮喘控制和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。从 2003 年(严重哮喘的第一种生物制剂批准的年份)到 2023 年 6 月,在 Embase、MEDLINE 和 EconLit 数据库中搜索描述接受生物制剂治疗的严重哮喘患者参与 PSP 的研究。由于研究之间存在异质性,无法直接汇总结果,因此进行了间接治疗比较(ITC),以确定参与 PSP 对治疗中断的影响。ITC 使用在英国接受 benralizumab 治疗的患者的患者水平数据,这些患者要么参加了 PSP(VOICE 研究,Connect 360 PSP),要么没有参加 PSP(Benralizumab Patient Access Programme 研究)。
发现
选择了 21 项研究的 25 条记录。六项研究调查了 PSP 对治疗依从性、哮喘控制或 HRQoL 的影响。所有六项研究都报告了参加 PSP 的患者的积极结果;每个 PSP 的好处都与提供的服务密切相关。ITC 显示,与非 PSP 组相比,Connect 360 PSP 组的患者更不可能停止治疗(OR 0.26,95%CI 0.11-0.57,p<0.001)。
结论
PSP 为接受生物治疗的严重哮喘患者带来了积极的临床结果。未来的分析将受益于对 PSP 服务的详细描述,以及允许直接比较有和没有 PSP 的患者结果的研究设计。