Suppr超能文献

儿科评估三角在儿科急诊科分诊流程中作为第一步的有效性。

The Validity of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle as the First Step in the Triage Process in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

作者信息

Fernández Ana, Ares Maria Isabel, Garcia Sara, Martinez-Indart Lorea, Mintegi Santiago, Benito Javier

机构信息

From the *Pediatric Emergency Department, and †Epidemiology Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Apr;33(4):234-238. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000717.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association between pediatric assessment triangle (PAT) findings during triage and markers of severity in a pediatric emergency department (PED).

METHODS

During the study period, patients arriving to the PED were classified by trained nurses with the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale using a computer system, from which data were obtained and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of children hospitalized related with PAT findings. The secondary outcome measures were the admission to the intensive care unit (%), PED length of stay, and performance of blood tests (%).

RESULTS

Among the 302,103 episodes included, there were abnormal PAT findings in 24,120 cases (7.9%). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age confirmed that PAT findings and triage level were independent risk factors for admission (odds ratio [OR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-2.29; OR, 6.01; 95% CI, 5.79-6.24, respectively). Abnormal findings in appearance or in more than 1 PAT component were even more strongly associated with admission (3.99; 95% CI, 3.63-4.38; 14.99, 95% CI, 11.99-18.74, respectively). When adjusted for triage level and age, abnormal PAT findings were also an independent risk factor for intensive care unit admission (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 3.77-5.24) and a longer stay in the PED (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.72-1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal findings in the PAT applied by trained nurses at triage identify patients with a higher risk of hospitalization. The PAT seems to be a valid tool for identifying the most severe patients as a first step in the triage process.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估儿科急诊科(PED)分诊期间的儿科评估三角(PAT)结果与严重程度指标之间的关联。

方法

在研究期间,到达PED的患者由经过培训的护士使用计算机系统根据加拿大儿科分诊和 acuity 量表进行分类,从中获取数据并进行回顾性分析。主要结局指标是与PAT结果相关的住院儿童百分比。次要结局指标是入住重症监护病房的百分比(%)、PED住院时间和血液检查的执行情况(%)。

结果

在纳入的302,103例病例中,24,120例(7.9%)存在异常PAT结果。调整年龄后的多变量分析证实,PAT结果和分诊级别是入院的独立危险因素(优势比[OR]分别为2.21;95%置信区间[CI],2.13 - 2.29;OR为6.01;95%CI,5.79 - 6.24)。外观异常或超过1个PAT组成部分的异常结果与入院的关联更强(分别为3.99;95%CI,3.63 - 4.38;14.99,95%CI,11.99 - 18.74)。调整分诊级别和年龄后,异常PAT结果也是入住重症监护病房的独立危险因素(OR,4.44;95%CI,3.77 - 5.24)和在PED停留时间更长的独立危险因素(OR,1.78;95%CI,1.72 - 1.84)。

结论

经过培训的护士在分诊时应用PAT的异常结果可识别出住院风险较高的患者。PAT似乎是在分诊过程中作为第一步识别最严重患者的有效工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验