Blomgren Anna-Sara, Svahn Kajsa, Åström Elisabeth, Rönnlund Michael
a Department of Psychology , Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden.
J Genet Psychol. 2016 May-Jun;177(3):85-96. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2016.1178101.
The authors investigated adolescents' use of coping strategies in relation to attachment to parents and time perspective. Adolescents in Grade 3 upper secondary school (M age = 18.3 years, SD = 0.6 years; n = 160) completed the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, and the Brief COPE. Correlational analyses showed that attachment to parents was associated with a more favorable view of the past (higher past positive and lower past negative), a less fatalistic view of the present, and a more favorable view of the future (higher future positive and lower future negative). Parental attachment accounted for significant variance in composite coping scores (adaptive and maladaptive) when entered before, but not after, time perspective subscales in hierarchical regression analyses. However, time perspective (mainly present hedonistic and positive or negative future) predicted adaptive or maladaptive coping over and beyond attachment. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that most of the relationship between adolescents' attachment to parents and coping is mediated by individual differences in time perspective. By contrast, factors other than attachment to parents (e.g., temperament) must be considered to fully account for the relationship between time perspective and coping.
作者调查了青少年应对策略的使用与对父母的依恋及时间观之间的关系。高中三年级的青少年(平均年龄=18.3岁,标准差=0.6岁;n=160)完成了父母与同伴依恋量表、津巴多时间观点量表和简易应对方式问卷。相关分析表明,对父母的依恋与对过去更积极的看法(更高的过去积极和更低的过去消极)、对现在不那么宿命论的看法以及对未来更积极的看法(更高的未来积极和更低的未来消极)有关。在分层回归分析中,当在时间观点分量表之前而非之后纳入时,父母依恋在综合应对得分(适应性和非适应性)中解释了显著的变异。然而,时间观(主要是当前享乐主义以及积极或消极的未来)在依恋之外还预测了适应性或非适应性应对。研究结果与以下假设一致:青少年对父母的依恋与应对之间的大部分关系是由时间观的个体差异介导的。相比之下,必须考虑除对父母的依恋之外的其他因素(如气质),以全面解释时间观与应对之间的关系。