Pongiglione Benedetta, De Stavola Bianca L, Kuper Hannah, Ploubidis George B
Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;31(8):735-46. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0160-8. Epub 2016 May 13.
Despite the vast body of literature studying disability and mortality, evidence to support their association is scarce. This work investigates the role of disability in explaining all-cause mortality among individuals aged 50+ who participated in the English Longitudinal Study of Aging. The aim is to explain the gender paradox in health and mortality by analysing whether the association of disability with mortality differs between women and men. Disability was conceived following the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), proposed by the WHO, that conceptualizes disability as a combination of three components: impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction. Latent variable models were used to identify domain-specific factors and general disability. The association of the latter with mortality up to 10 years after enrolment was estimated using discrete-time survival analysis. Our work confirms the validity of the ICF framework and finds that disability is strongly associated with mortality, with a time-varying effect among men, and a smaller constant effect for women. Adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic and behavioural factors attenuated the association for both sexes, but overall the effects remained high and significant. These findings confirm the existence of gender paradox by showing that, when affected by disability, women survive longer than men, although if men survive the first years they appear to become more resilient to disability. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the gender paradox cannot be solely explained by gender-specific health conditions: there must be other mechanisms acting within the pathway between disability and mortality that need to be explored.
尽管有大量关于残疾与死亡率的文献研究,但支持它们之间关联的证据却很稀少。这项研究调查了残疾在解释参与英国老龄化纵向研究的50岁及以上人群全因死亡率方面的作用。目的是通过分析残疾与死亡率之间的关联在男性和女性中是否存在差异,来解释健康与死亡率方面的性别悖论。残疾是按照世界卫生组织提出的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)来界定的,该分类将残疾概念化为三个组成部分的组合:损伤、活动受限和参与限制。使用潜在变量模型来识别特定领域因素和一般残疾情况。使用离散时间生存分析估计了入组后长达10年的后者与死亡率之间的关联。我们的研究证实了ICF框架的有效性,并发现残疾与死亡率密切相关,男性存在随时间变化的影响,而女性的影响较小且恒定。对人口统计学、社会经济和行为因素进行调整后,两性之间的关联有所减弱,但总体影响仍然很大且显著。这些发现通过表明尽管受残疾影响时女性比男性存活时间更长,但如果男性度过最初几年,他们似乎对残疾更具恢复力,从而证实了性别悖论的存在。敏感性分析表明,性别悖论不能仅由特定性别的健康状况来解释:在残疾与死亡率之间的路径中必定存在其他起作用的机制,有待进一步探索。