Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Phys Med Biol. 2023 May 30;68(11):115018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acd433.
. To evaluate the impact of setup uncertainty reduction (SUR) and adaptation to geometrical changes (AGC) on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) when using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT).A cohort of ten retrospective head and neck cancer patients with daily scatter corrected cone-beam CT (CBCT) was studied. For each patient, two IMPT treatment plans were created: one with a 3 mm setup uncertainty robustness setting and one with no explicit setup robustness. Both plans were recalculated on the daily CBCT considering three scenarios: the robust plan without adaptation, the non-robust plan without adaptation and the non-robust plan with daily online adaptation. Online-adaptation was simulated using an in-house developed workflow based on GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose calculation and partial spot-intensity re-optimization. Dose distributions associated with each scenario were accumulated on the planning CT, where NTCP models for six toxicities were applied. NTCP values from each scenario were intercompared to quantify the reduction in toxicity risk induced by SUR alone, AGC alone and SUR and AGC combined. Finally, a decision tree was implemented to assess the clinical significance of the toxicity reduction associated with each mechanism.. For most patients, clinically meaningful NTCP reductions were only achieved when SUR and AGC were performed together. In these conditions, total reductions in NTCP of up to 30.48 pp were obtained, with noticeable NTCP reductions for aspiration, dysphagia and xerostomia (mean reductions of 8.25, 5.42 and 5.12 pp respectively). While SUR had a generally larger impact than AGC on NTCP reductions, SUR alone did not induce clinically meaningful toxicity reductions in any patient, compared to only one for AGC alone.Online adaptive head and neck proton therapy can only yield clinically significant reductions in the risk of long-term side effects when combining the benefits of SUR and AGC.
. 评估在线自适应头颈部强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)中,利用设置不确定性降低(SUR)和适应几何变化(AGC)对正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)的影响。研究了一组十名接受每日散射校正锥形束 CT(CBCT)的回顾性头颈部癌症患者。对于每位患者,创建了两个 IMPT 治疗计划:一个具有 3 毫米设置不确定性稳健性设置,另一个没有明确的设置稳健性。在考虑三种情况的情况下,基于 GPU 加速蒙特卡罗剂量计算和部分点强度重新优化,在每日 CBCT 上重新计算了这两个计划:稳健计划无适应,非稳健计划无适应和非稳健计划每日在线适应。在线适应使用内部开发的基于 GPU 加速蒙特卡罗剂量计算和部分点强度重新优化的工作流程进行模拟。与每种情况相关的剂量分布累积在计划 CT 上,其中应用了六种毒性的 NTCP 模型。通过比较每种情况的 NTCP 值,量化了 SUR 单独、AGC 单独和 SUR 和 AGC 联合降低毒性风险的程度。最后,实现了决策树来评估与每种机制相关的毒性降低的临床意义。对于大多数患者,只有在 SUR 和 AGC 一起进行时,才会获得具有临床意义的 NTCP 降低。在这些条件下,NTCP 总降低高达 30.48%,在吸入、吞咽困难和口干方面具有明显的 NTCP 降低(平均降低分别为 8.25%、5.42%和 5.12%)。尽管 SUR 对 NTCP 降低的影响通常大于 AGC,但与单独使用 AGC 相比,SUR 单独在任何患者中都没有引起具有临床意义的毒性降低,而只有一名患者单独使用 AGC。在线自适应头颈部质子治疗只有在结合 SUR 和 AGC 的优势时,才能降低长期副作用风险的临床显著降低。