Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK.
St George's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lancet. 2016 Jul 9;388(10040):170-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30443-3. Epub 2016 May 10.
Studies in many health systems have shown evidence of poorer quality health care for patients admitted on weekends or overnight than for those admitted during the week (the so-called weekend effect). We postulated that variation in quality was dependent on not only day, but also time, of admission, and aimed to describe the pattern and magnitude of variation in the quality of acute stroke care across the entire week.
We did this nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study using data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. We included all adult patients (aged >16 years) admitted to hospital with acute stroke (ischaemic or primary intracerebral haemorrhage) in England and Wales between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014. Our outcome measure was 30 day post-admission survival. We estimated adjusted odds ratios for 13 indicators of acute stroke-care quality by fitting multilevel multivariable regression models across 42 4-h time periods per week.
The study cohort comprised 74,307 patients with acute stroke admitted to 199 hospitals. Care quality varied across the entire week, not only between weekends and weekdays, with different quality measures showing different patterns and magnitudes of temporal variation. We identified four patterns of variation: a diurnal pattern (thrombolysis, brain scan within 12 h, brain scan within 1 h, dysphagia screening), a day of the week pattern (stroke physician assessment, nurse assessment, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and assessment of communication and swallowing by a speech and language therapist), an off-hours pattern (door-to-needle time for thrombolysis), and a flow pattern whereby quality changed sequentially across days (stroke-unit admission within 4 h). The largest magnitude of variation was for door-to-needle time within 60 min (range in quality 35-66% [16/46-232/350]; coefficient of variation 18·2). There was no difference in 30 day survival between weekends and weekdays (adjusted odds ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·95-1·13), but patients admitted overnight on weekdays had lower odds of survival (0·90, 0·82-0·99).
The weekend effect is a simplification, and just one of several patterns of weekly variation occurring in the quality of stroke care. Weekly variation should be further investigated in other health-care settings, and quality improvement should focus on reducing temporal variation in quality and not only the weekend effect.
None.
许多卫生系统的研究表明,相较于一周内其他时间入院的患者,周末或夜间入院的患者接受的医疗服务质量较差(即所谓的周末效应)。我们推测,质量的变化不仅取决于入院日期,还取决于入院时间,并旨在描述整个一周内急性脑卒中护理质量的变化模式和幅度。
我们使用 Sentinel Stroke 国家审计计划的登记处前瞻性队列研究数据进行了这项全国性研究。我们纳入了 2013 年 4 月 1 日至 2014 年 3 月 31 日期间英格兰和威尔士因急性脑卒中(缺血性或原发性脑出血)入院的所有成年患者(年龄>16 岁)。我们的结局指标为入院后 30 天的存活情况。我们通过在每周 42 个 4 小时时间段拟合多水平多变量回归模型,估计了 13 项急性脑卒中护理质量指标的调整后比值比。
研究队列包括了 199 家医院的 74307 名急性脑卒中患者。整个星期的护理质量都存在差异,不仅周末和工作日之间存在差异,而且不同的质量指标显示出不同的时间变化模式和幅度。我们确定了四种变化模式:昼夜模式(溶栓、12 小时内进行脑部扫描、1 小时内进行脑部扫描、吞咽障碍筛查)、一周内某天的模式(脑卒中医生评估、护士评估、物理治疗、职业治疗以及言语和语言治疗师对沟通和吞咽能力的评估)、非工作时间模式(溶栓的门到针时间)以及连续几天的流程模式(4 小时内入住脑卒中单元)。变化幅度最大的是 60 分钟内的门到针时间(质量差异范围为 35%至 66%[16/46 至 232/350];变异系数为 18.2%)。周末和工作日之间的 30 天存活率没有差异(调整后比值比 1.03,95%CI 0.95-1.13),但工作日夜间入院的患者存活几率较低(0.90,0.82-0.99)。
周末效应是一种简化,只是脑卒中护理质量中几种周内变化模式之一。应进一步在其他医疗保健环境中调查每周变化,质量改进应侧重于减少质量的时间变化,而不仅仅是周末效应。
无。