Suppr超能文献

全科医生在心血管疾病预防中治疗惰性的理由:基于实证的类型学

General practitioners' justifications for therapeutic inertia in cardiovascular prevention: an empirically grounded typology.

作者信息

Lebeau Jean-Pierre, Cadwallader Jean-Sébastien, Vaillant-Roussel Hélène, Pouchain Denis, Yaouanc Virginie, Aubin-Auger Isabelle, Mercier Alain, Rusch Emmanuel, Remmen Roy, Vermeire Etienne, Hendrickx Kristin

机构信息

Department of General Practice, EES Research Team, University of Tours. Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France.

Department of General Practice, University of Tours. Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010639.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To construct a typology of general practitioners' (GPs) responses regarding their justification of therapeutic inertia in cardiovascular primary prevention for high-risk patients with hypertension.

DESIGN

Empirically grounded construction of typology. Types were defined by attributes derived from the qualitative analysis of GPs' reported reasons for inaction.

PARTICIPANTS

256 GPs randomised in the intervention group of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

GPs members of 23 French Regional Colleges of Teachers in General Practice, included in the EffectS of a multifaceted intervention on CArdiovascular risk factors in high-risk hyPErtensive patients (ESCAPE) trial.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The database consisted of 2638 written responses given by the GPs to an open-ended question asking for the reasons why drug treatment was not changed as suggested by the national guidelines. All answers were coded using constant comparison analysis. A matrix analysis of codes per GP allowed the construction of a response typology, where types were defined by codes as attributes. Initial coding and definition of types were performed independently by two teams.

RESULTS

Initial coding resulted in a list of 69 codes in the final codebook, representing 4764 coded references in the question responses. A typology including seven types was constructed. 100 GPs were allocated to one and only one of these types, while 25 GPs did not provide enough data to allow classification. Types (numbers of GPs allocated) were: 'optimists' (28), 'negotiators' (20), 'checkers' (15), 'contextualisers' (13), 'cautious' (11), 'rounders' (8) and 'scientists' (5). For the 36 GPs that provided 50 or more coded references, analysis of the code evolution over time and across patients showed a consistent belonging to the initial type for any given GP.

CONCLUSION

This typology could provide GPs with some insight into their general ways of considering changes in the treatment/management of cardiovascular risk factors and guide design of specific physician-centred interventions to reduce inappropriate inaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00348855.

摘要

目的

构建一个类型学,以描述全科医生(GP)对于高危高血压患者心血管疾病一级预防中治疗惰性理由的回应方式。

设计

基于实证构建类型学。类型由对全科医生报告的不作为原因进行定性分析得出的属性来定义。

参与者

256名全科医生被随机分配到一项整群随机对照试验的干预组。

背景

23个法国地区全科医生学院的成员,参与了针对高危高血压患者心血管危险因素的多方面干预效果(ESCAPE)试验。

数据收集与分析

数据库由全科医生对一个开放式问题的2638份书面回复组成,该问题询问未按照国家指南建议改变药物治疗的原因。所有答案都使用持续比较分析法进行编码。对每个全科医生的代码进行矩阵分析,构建了一个回应类型学,其中类型由代码作为属性来定义。初始编码和类型定义由两个团队独立进行。

结果

初始编码在最终编码手册中产生了69个代码列表,代表问题回复中的4764个编码参考。构建了一个包含七种类型的类型学。100名全科医生被分配到且仅被分配到其中一种类型,而25名全科医生没有提供足够的数据进行分类。类型(分配的全科医生数量)分别为:“乐观者”(28名)、“协商者”(20名)、“检查者”(15名)、“情境化者”(13名)、“谨慎者”(11名)、“完善者”(8名)和“科学家型”(5名)。对于提供了50个或更多编码参考的36名全科医生,对代码随时间和患者的演变分析表明,任何给定的全科医生始终属于初始类型。

结论

这种类型学可以让全科医生对他们考虑心血管危险因素治疗/管理变化的一般方式有一些了解,并指导设计以医生为中心的特定干预措施,以减少不适当的不作为。

试验注册号

NCT00348855。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3458/4874143/0ce282721386/bmjopen2015010639f01.jpg

相似文献

9
Burden of cardiovascular disease across 29 countries and GPs' decision to treat hypertension in oldest-old.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):89-98. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426142. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
I Brazilian guideline on hypertension in dialysis of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology.
J Bras Nefrol. 2025 Jan-Mar;47(1):e20240033. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0033en.
3
World Heart Federation Roadmap for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: 2023 Update.
Glob Heart. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):8. doi: 10.5334/gh.1278. eCollection 2024.
5
Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e21795. doi: 10.2196/21795.
6
Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among French GPs: A long and winding road.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0220460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220460. eCollection 2019.
9
Clinical inertia and the 2017 ACA/AHA guideline.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Oct;20(10):1392-1394. doi: 10.1111/jch.13373. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
10
Prevalence of primary aldosteronism in primary care: a cross-sectional study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Feb;68(667):e114-e122. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X694589. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

4
Management of hypertension in adults: the 2013 French Society of Hypertension guidelines.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Feb;28(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12044. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
5
Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):145-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212914. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
6
Adherence to drugs that prevent cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis on 376,162 patients.
Am J Med. 2012 Sep;125(9):882-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
9
Changes in the rates of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Canada over the past two decades.
CMAJ. 2011 Jun 14;183(9):1007-13. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101767. Epub 2011 May 16.
10
Patterns of hypertension management in France (ENNS 2006-2007).
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):213-20. doi: 10.1177/1741826710394303. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验