• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多方面干预对高危高血压患者心血管危险因素的影响:ESCAPE试验,一项全科医疗中的实用整群随机试验。

Effects of a multifaceted intervention on cardiovascular risk factors in high-risk hypertensive patients: the ESCAPE trial, a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in general practice.

作者信息

Pouchain Denis, Lièvre Michel, Huas Dominique, Lebeau Jean-Pierre, Renard Vincent, Bruckert Eric, Girerd Xavier, Boutitie Florent

机构信息

Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Université Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5558, rue Guillaume Paradin, BP 8071, Lyon Cedex 08, 69376,, France.

出版信息

Trials. 2013 Oct 1;14:318. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-318.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-14-318
PMID:24083783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3849945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several observational studies on hypertensive patients have shown a gap between therapeutic targets recommended in guidelines and those achieved in daily practice. The ESCAPE trial aimed to determine whether a multifaceted intervention focused on general practitioners (GPs), could increase significantly the proportion of hypertensive patients at high risk in primary prevention who achieved all their recommended therapeutic targets.

METHODS

A pragmatic, cluster randomized trial involving 257 GPs randomized by region. The GPs in the intervention group had a one-day training session and were given an electronic blood pressure measurement device and a short recommendation leaflet. Along with usual follow-up, they focused one consultation on hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors every six months for two years. They also received feedback at baseline and at one year on their patients' clinical and biological parameters. Main outcome measures were change in the proportion of patients achieving all their therapeutic targets and each individual therapeutic target at two years, and quality of life.

RESULTS

1,832 high-risk hypertensive patients were included. After two years, the proportion of patients achieving all their therapeutic targets increased significantly in both groups, but significantly more in the intervention group: OR (odds-ratio) 1.89, (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to 3.27, P = 0.02). Significantly more patients achieved their blood pressure targets in the intervention group than in the usual care group: OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.88, P < 0.0001). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased significantly more in the intervention group than in the usual care group, by 4.8 mmHg and 1.9 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both). There were no significant difference changes in physical and mental quality of life between groups.

CONCLUSION

An easy-to-perform, multifaceted intervention targeting only GPs increased significantly the proportion of high-risk hypertensive patients in primary prevention achieving their recommended therapeutic targets.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00348855.

摘要

背景

多项针对高血压患者的观察性研究表明,指南推荐的治疗目标与日常实践中所达到的目标之间存在差距。ESCAPE试验旨在确定一项针对全科医生(GP)的多方面干预措施是否能显著提高一级预防中高危高血压患者达到所有推荐治疗目标的比例。

方法

一项实用的整群随机试验,涉及按地区随机分组的257名全科医生。干预组的全科医生参加了为期一天的培训课程,并获得了一台电子血压测量设备和一份简短的推荐手册。除了常规随访外,他们在两年内每六个月针对高血压和其他心血管危险因素进行一次会诊。他们还在基线时和一年时收到关于其患者临床和生物学参数的反馈。主要结局指标为两年时达到所有治疗目标和每个个体治疗目标的患者比例变化以及生活质量。

结果

纳入了1832例高危高血压患者。两年后,两组中达到所有治疗目标的患者比例均显著增加,但干预组增加得更为显著:比值比(OR)为1.89,(95%置信区间(CI)为1.09至3.27,P = 0.02)。干预组中达到血压目标的患者显著多于常规护理组:OR为2.03(95%CI为1.44至2.88,P < 0.0001)。干预组的收缩压和舒张压下降幅度分别比常规护理组显著多4.8 mmHg和1.9 mmHg(两者P < 0.0001)。两组之间在身体和心理生活质量方面没有显著差异变化。

结论

一项仅针对全科医生的易于实施的多方面干预措施显著提高了一级预防中高危高血压患者达到推荐治疗目标的比例。

试验注册

本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00348855。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f04/3849945/88636e109b9d/1745-6215-14-318-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f04/3849945/88636e109b9d/1745-6215-14-318-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f04/3849945/88636e109b9d/1745-6215-14-318-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of a multifaceted intervention on cardiovascular risk factors in high-risk hypertensive patients: the ESCAPE trial, a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in general practice.多方面干预对高危高血压患者心血管危险因素的影响:ESCAPE试验,一项全科医疗中的实用整群随机试验。
Trials. 2013 Oct 1;14:318. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-318.
2
Statistical analysis plan for the control of blood pressure and risk attenuation-rural Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka (COBRA-BPS) trial: a cluster randomized trial for a multicomponent intervention versus usual care in hypertensive patients.孟加拉国农村、巴基斯坦、斯里兰卡血压控制与风险降低试验(COBRA - BPS)的统计分析计划:一项针对高血压患者的多成分干预与常规护理对比的整群随机试验。
Trials. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3022-8.
3
General practitioners' justifications for therapeutic inertia in cardiovascular prevention: an empirically grounded typology.全科医生在心血管疾病预防中治疗惰性的理由:基于实证的类型学
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010639.
4
Hypertension Improvement Project (HIP): study protocol and implementation challenges.高血压改善项目(HIP):研究方案与实施挑战
Trials. 2009 Feb 26;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-13.
5
Suitability of antiplatelet therapy in hypertensive patients.抗血小板治疗在高血压患者中的适用性。
J Hum Hypertens. 2015 Jan;29(1):40-5. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2014.25. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
6
Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): a cluster randomized trial of a tailored intervention.基层医疗中的合理用药(RaPP):一项量身定制干预措施的整群随机试验。
PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030134.
7
The COSEHC™ Global Vascular Risk Management quality improvement program: first follow-up report.COSEHC™全球血管风险管理质量改进项目:首次随访报告。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:391-400. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S44950. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
8
The MAURO study: baseline characteristics and compliance with guidelines targets.MAURO 研究:基线特征和对指南目标的依从性。
J Nephrol. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(6):1081-90. doi: 10.5301/jn.5000239.
9
Cardiovascular disease guideline adherence and self-reported statin use in longstanding type 1 diabetes: results from the Canadian study of longevity in diabetes cohort.长期1型糖尿病患者心血管疾病指南依从性及自我报告的他汀类药物使用情况:来自加拿大糖尿病队列长寿研究的结果
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Jan 25;15:14. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0318-9.
10
Individualized Risk Communication and Outreach for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Community Health Centers: Randomized Trial.社区卫生中心原发性心血管疾病预防的个性化风险沟通与推广:随机试验
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Nov;8(6):560-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001723. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care clinician education interventions for improving blood pressure control for people prescribed antihypertensive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.初级保健临床医生教育干预措施对接受抗高血压治疗患者血压控制的改善作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 28;15(8):e087692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087692.
2
Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.卫生保健专业人员在高血压患者血压控制干预措施成功中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of hypertension management in France (ENNS 2006-2007).法国高血压管理模式(ENNS 2006-2007)。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):213-20. doi: 10.1177/1741826710394303. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
2
ESCAPE-ancillary blood pressure measurement study: end-digit preference in blood pressure measurement within a cluster-randomized trial.ESCAPE辅助血压测量研究:整群随机试验中血压测量的尾数偏好
Blood Press Monit. 2011 Apr;16(2):74-9. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328344d067.
3
High blood pressure prevalence and control in a middle-aged French population and their associated factors: the MONA LISA study.
Practice visitations in primary care to improve performance of cardiovascular risk management: an observational study.
基层医疗中的实践探访以改善心血管风险管理绩效:一项观察性研究。
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0213. Print 2024 Oct.
4
Optimizing Antihypertensive Management for Hypertensive Patients With Secondary Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Primary Care Settings.优化合并继发性并发症的高血压患者的降压管理:基层医疗环境中的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Sep 23;15(9):e45834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45834. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Cannabis users: Screen systematically, treat individually. A descriptive study of participants in a randomized trial in primary care.大麻使用者:系统筛查,个体化治疗。初级保健中一项随机试验参与者的描述性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0224867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224867. eCollection 2019.
6
Personalized Risk Index for Neurocognitive Decline Among People With Well-Controlled HIV Infection.HIV感染控制良好者神经认知功能下降的个性化风险指数
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Sep 1;76(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001466.
7
General practitioners' justifications for therapeutic inertia in cardiovascular prevention: an empirically grounded typology.全科医生在心血管疾病预防中治疗惰性的理由:基于实证的类型学
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010639.
8
Hypertension Management in Primary Care.基层医疗中的高血压管理
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Mar 11;113(10):167-74. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0167.
9
Hypertension management in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.基层医疗中的高血压管理:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Mar 21;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0627-z.
法国中年人群高血压患病率及控制情况及其相关因素:MONA LISA 研究。
J Hypertens. 2011 Jan;29(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833f9c4d.
4
Multicenter cluster-randomized trial of a multifactorial intervention to improve antihypertensive medication adherence and blood pressure control among patients at high cardiovascular risk (the COM99 study).多中心整群随机对照试验,针对具有较高心血管风险的患者,实施多因素干预措施以提高抗高血压药物治疗依从性和血压控制水平(COM99 研究)。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 21;122(12):1183-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.892778. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
5
Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.护士主导的干预措施以改善高血压患者的血压控制:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 23;341:c3995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3995.
6
Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension.用于改善高血压患者血压控制的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD005182. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005182.pub4.
7
Effect of tailored practice and patient care plans on secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial.定制化实践与患者护理计划对全科医疗中冠心病二级预防的影响:整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2009 Oct 29;339:b4220. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4220.
8
Poor blood pressure control in general practice: in search of explanations.全科医疗中血压控制不佳:探寻原因
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Jun-Jul;102(6-7):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
9
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.阿司匹林用于血管疾病的一级和二级预防:来自随机试验的个体参与者数据的协作荟萃分析
Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1849-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60503-1.
10
Cluster-randomized controlled trial of oscillometric vs. manual sphygmomanometer for blood pressure management in primary care (CRAB).用于初级保健中血压管理的示波法与手动血压计的整群随机对照试验(CRAB)
Am J Hypertens. 2009 Jun;22(6):598-603. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.55. Epub 2009 Mar 19.