Roy Stephen, McCrory Jean
Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Human Performance and Applied Exercise Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2015 Oct 1;8(4):318-330. doi: 10.70252/UWVU7108. eCollection 2015.
The purpose of the study was to determine if measured maximal heart rate (HR) was affected by sex or aerobic training status, and to determine the accuracy of three common clinical age-prediction maximal heart rate regression equations used to predict HR: · . Fifty-two participants in total, 30 of which were in the active group (15 M, 15 F) and 22 subjects in the sedentary group (9 M, 13 F), within the age range of 18-25 years and with a normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg·m) underwent a Bruce maximal treadmill exercise protocol. The effect of sex and training status on HR was analyzed through a two-way ANOVA, and the effect of sex, aerobic training status, and regression equation on accuracy of the HR prediction was assessed with a three-way ANOVA (α=0.05). Overall, males had a higher HR than females (198.3 v. 190.4 beats • min, p<.001) and sedentary individuals had higher measured HR than active individuals (197.3 v. 191.4 beats • min, p=.002). Furthermore, · calculated the smallest signed and unsigned residuals from the difference between observed HR and predicted HR values for the significant main effects of equation (3), equation × sex (females × 3), and equation × activity level (active × 3). Therefore, based on our results, we conclude that · has greater accuracy than the other two equations studied for predicting observed values of HR in 18-25 year olds.
该研究的目的是确定测量的最大心率(HR)是否受性别或有氧训练状态的影响,并确定用于预测HR的三个常见临床年龄预测最大心率回归方程的准确性:··。共有52名参与者,其中30名属于活跃组(15名男性,15名女性),22名属于久坐组(9名男性,13名女性),年龄在18至25岁之间,体重指数正常(18.5 - 24.9 kg·m),他们进行了布鲁斯最大跑步机运动方案。通过双向方差分析分析性别和训练状态对HR的影响,并通过三向方差分析评估性别、有氧训练状态和回归方程对HR预测准确性的影响(α = 0.05)。总体而言,男性的HR高于女性(198.3对190.4次/分钟,p <.001),久坐个体测量的HR高于活跃个体(197.3对191.4次/分钟,p =.002)。此外,··计算了方程(3)、方程×性别(女性×3)和方程×活动水平(活跃×3)的显著主效应中观察到的HR与预测HR值之间差异的最小有符号和无符号残差。因此,根据我们的结果,我们得出结论,对于预测18至25岁人群的HR观察值,··比研究的其他两个方程具有更高的准确性。