Suppr超能文献

含钾竞争性酸阻滞剂的三联疗法与基于质子泵抑制剂的7天低剂量克拉霉素三联疗法的疗效和耐受性比较

The Efficacy and Tolerability of a Triple Therapy Containing a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Compared With a 7-Day PPI-Based Low-Dose Clarithromycin Triple Therapy.

作者信息

Suzuki Sho, Gotoda Takuji, Kusano Chika, Iwatsuka Kunio, Moriyama Mitsuhiko

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Yuri-Kumiai General Hospital, Akita, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;111(7):949-56. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.182. Epub 2016 May 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), a new class of gastric acid inhibitory agents, as first-line H. pylori eradication treatment compared with 7-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 661 consecutive patients who received first-line H. pylori eradication treatment between January 2013 and October 2015. Patients who received 7-day P-CAB therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg+amoxicillin 750 mg+clarithromycin 200 mg twice/day; n=181) were compared with those who received 7-day PPI therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg/rabeprazole 20 mg+amoxicillin 750 mg+clarithromycin 200 mg twice/day; n=480) using propensity score matching analysis. The successful eradication and adverse event rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The propensity score matching analysis yielded 175 matched pairs. Adjusted comparisons between the two groups showed a significantly higher eradication rate for the P-CAB than the PPI group in both intention-to-treat (89.1 vs. 70.9%; P<0.001) and per-protocol analyses (91.2 vs. 71.7%; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two therapies except skin rash. No patients discontinued H. pylori eradication treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven-day P-CAB-based triple therapy was more effective than 7-day PPI-based triple therapy as a first-line H. pylori eradication treatment. Seven-day P-CAB-based triple therapy was generally well-tolerated.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了新型胃酸抑制剂钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)作为一线幽门螺杆菌根除治疗与基于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的7天三联疗法相比的疗效和耐受性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2015年10月期间接受一线幽门螺杆菌根除治疗的661例连续患者的病历。将接受7天P-CAB疗法(沃克20mg+阿莫西林750mg+克拉霉素200mg,每日两次;n=181)的患者与接受7天PPI疗法(兰索拉唑30mg/雷贝拉唑20mg+阿莫西林750mg+克拉霉素200mg,每日两次;n=480)的患者进行倾向评分匹配分析。比较两组的根除成功率和不良事件发生率。

结果

倾向评分匹配分析产生了175对匹配对。两组间的校正比较显示,在意向性治疗(89.1%对70.9%;P<0.001)和符合方案分析(91.2%对71.7%;P<0.001)中,P-CAB组的根除率均显著高于PPI组。除皮疹外,两种疗法的不良事件发生率无显著差异。没有患者因不良事件而停止幽门螺杆菌根除治疗。

结论

作为一线幽门螺杆菌根除治疗,基于7天P-CAB的三联疗法比基于7天PPI的三联疗法更有效。基于7天P-CAB的三联疗法总体耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验