• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10 天高剂量质子泵抑制剂三联疗法与序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的比较。

Ten-day high-dose proton pump inhibitor triple therapy versus sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;33(11):1822-1828. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14292. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.14292
PMID:29804294
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori following standard triple therapy are declining worldwide, but high-dose proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy (HD-PPI-TT) and sequential therapy (ST) have demonstrated higher cure rates. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of HD-PPI-TT and ST in H. pylori-associated functional dyspepsia (FD).

METHODS

One hundred and twenty H. pylori-associated functional dyspepsia patients were randomized to receive 10-day HD-PPI-TT (60 mg lansoprazole/500 mg clarithromycin/1 g amoxicillin, each administered twice daily for 10 days) or 10-day ST (30 mg lansoprazole/1 g amoxicillin, each administered twice daily for 5 days followed by 30 mg lansoprazole/500 mg clarithromycin/400 mg metronidazole, each administered twice daily for 5 days). H. pylori status was determined in post-treatment week 4 by C-urea breath test. Eradication and antibiotic resistance rates, dyspeptic symptoms, drug compliance, and adverse effects were compared.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat eradication rates were similar in the ST and HD-PPI-TT groups (85% vs. 80%; P = 0.47). However, the eradication rate was significantly higher following ST compared with HD-PPI-TT in per protocol analysis (94.4% vs. 81.4%; P = 0.035). ST achieved higher cure rates than HD-PPI-TT in clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains (100% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.02). Treatment compliance was similar in the HD-PPI-TT and ST groups, although nausea and dizziness were more common in the ST group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapy achieved better H. pylori eradication than HD-PPI-TT in patients with FD. However, the eradication rate for ST fell from 94.4% in per protocol to 85% in intention-to-treat analysis. Adverse effects might result in poorer compliance and compromise actual ST efficacy (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01888237).

摘要

背景与目的

全球范围内,标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的根除率正在下降,但高剂量质子泵抑制剂三联疗法(HD-PPI-TT)和序贯疗法(ST)已显示出更高的治愈率。我们旨在比较 HD-PPI-TT 和 ST 在幽门螺杆菌相关功能性消化不良(FD)中的疗效和耐受性。

方法

将 120 例幽门螺杆菌相关功能性消化不良患者随机分为接受 10 天 HD-PPI-TT(60mg 兰索拉唑/500mg 克拉霉素/1g 阿莫西林,每日两次,共 10 天)或 10 天 ST(30mg 兰索拉唑/1g 阿莫西林,每日两次,共 5 天,然后 30mg 兰索拉唑/500mg 克拉霉素/400mg 甲硝唑,每日两次,共 5 天)。治疗后第 4 周通过 C-尿素呼气试验确定 H. pylori 状态。比较根除率和抗生素耐药率、消化不良症状、药物依从性和不良反应。

结果

意向治疗根除率在 ST 和 HD-PPI-TT 组之间相似(85% vs. 80%;P=0.47)。然而,在方案分析中,ST 的根除率明显高于 HD-PPI-TT(94.4% vs. 81.4%;P=0.035)。ST 在克拉霉素耐药的幽门螺杆菌菌株中获得了比 HD-PPI-TT 更高的治愈率(100% vs. 33.3%;P=0.02)。HD-PPI-TT 和 ST 组的治疗依从性相似,但 ST 组更常见恶心和头晕。

结论

序贯疗法在 FD 患者中比 HD-PPI-TT 更能有效地根除幽门螺杆菌。然而,ST 的根除率从方案分析中的 94.4%降至意向治疗分析中的 85%。不良反应可能导致依从性较差,从而影响实际 ST 疗效(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01888237)。

相似文献

1
Ten-day high-dose proton pump inhibitor triple therapy versus sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.10 天高剂量质子泵抑制剂三联疗法与序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;33(11):1822-1828. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14292. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Ten-day triple therapy versus sequential therapy versus concomitant therapy as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection.作为幽门螺杆菌感染一线治疗的10天三联疗法与序贯疗法及联合疗法的比较
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;30(7):1134-9. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12892.
3
A multicenter, randomized, prospective study of 14-day ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. lansoprazole-based triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients.一项多中心、随机、前瞻性研究,比较雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋14天疗法与基于兰索拉唑的三联疗法对消化不良患者幽门螺杆菌的根除效果。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2013;24(4):316-21. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2013.0509.
4
Ten-Day Concomitant, 10-Day Sequential, and 7-Day Triple Therapy as First-Line Treatment for Infection: A Nationwide Randomized Trial in Korea.十日伴随疗法、十日序贯疗法与七日三联疗法作为一线治疗方案用于 感染:韩国全国范围内的一项随机试验
Gut Liver. 2019 Sep 15;13(5):531-540. doi: 10.5009/gnl19136.
5
Concomitant therapy achieved the best eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori among various treatment strategies.在各种治疗策略中,联合治疗对幽门螺杆菌的根除率最高。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):351-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.351.
6
Comparison of sequential and standard triple-drug regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a 14-day, open-label, randomized, prospective, parallel-arm study in adult patients with nonulcer dyspepsia.序贯疗法与标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的比较:一项针对非溃疡性消化不良成年患者的14天开放标签随机前瞻性平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.009.
7
Ten-day sequential therapy is more effective than proton pump inhibitor-based therapy in Korea: a prospective, randomized study.十日序贯疗法比质子泵抑制剂为基础的疗法在韩国更有效:一项前瞻性、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;27(3):504-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06922.x.
8
Randomised clinical trial: the efficacy of a 10-day sequential therapy vs. a 14-day standard proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori in Korea.随机临床试验:10 天序贯疗法与 14 天标准质子泵抑制剂三联疗法治疗韩国幽门螺杆菌的疗效比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;34(9):1098-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04843.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
9
Sequential therapy for 10 days versus triple therapy for 14 days in the eradication of in the community and hospital populations: a randomised trial.在社区和医院人群中根除幽门螺杆菌方面,10天序贯疗法与14天三联疗法的对比:一项随机试验。
Gut. 2016 Nov;65(11):1784-1792. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310142. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
10
The Efficacy and Tolerability of a Triple Therapy Containing a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Compared With a 7-Day PPI-Based Low-Dose Clarithromycin Triple Therapy.含钾竞争性酸阻滞剂的三联疗法与基于质子泵抑制剂的7天低剂量克拉霉素三联疗法的疗效和耐受性比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;111(7):949-56. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.182. Epub 2016 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Network meta-analysis of treatment interventions for infection in adult populations in East and Southeast Asia.东亚和东南亚成年人群感染治疗干预措施的网状Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 10;15:1462057. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1462057. eCollection 2024.
2
Sequential versus Standard Triple Therapy for First-Line Eradication: An Update.一线根除治疗的序贯疗法与标准三联疗法:最新进展
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;13(2):136. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020136.
3
Efficacy of Sequential Therapy as the First-Line Treatment in the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori.
序贯疗法作为根除幽门螺杆菌一线治疗的疗效
Cureus. 2023 Sep 20;15(9):e45593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45593. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Comparison of the efficacies of triple, quadruple and sequential antibiotic therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized controlled trial.三联、四联和序贯抗生素疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug;42(4):517-524. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01322-8. Epub 2023 May 17.
5
The efficacy of vonoprazan combined with different dose amoxicillin on eradication of : an open, multicenter, randomized clinical study.沃克(富马酸伏诺拉生)联合不同剂量阿莫西林根除[幽门螺杆菌]的疗效:一项开放性、多中心、随机临床试验
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):987. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4133.
6
Randomized Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Triple Therapy Versus Sequential Therapy in Helicobacter pylori Eradication.三联疗法与序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效的随机临床试验
Cureus. 2022 May 10;14(5):e24897. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24897. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Optimizing proton pump inhibitors in treatment: Old and new tricks to improve effectiveness.优化质子泵抑制剂治疗:提高疗效的新老方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 14;25(34):5097-5104. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i34.5097.
8
Rifabutin and Furazolidone Could Be the Candidates of the Rescue Regimen for Antibiotic-Resistant in Korea.利福布汀和呋喃唑酮可能是韩国抗生素耐药性挽救治疗方案的候选药物。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2019 Jul 10;2019:9351801. doi: 10.1155/2019/9351801. eCollection 2019.