Suppr超能文献

动力稳定系统的临床经验:用于腰椎退行性疾病的Dynesys和Dynesys顶部加载系统

Clinical experiences of dynamic stabilizers: Dynesys and Dynesys top loading system for lumbar spine degenerative disease.

作者信息

Hsieh Cheng-Ta, Chang Chih-Ju, Su I-Chang, Lin Li-Ying

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Apr;32(4):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

Abstract

Dynesys (Dynamic Neutralization System) was designed to overcome the shortcomings of fusion. The Dynesys top loading (DTL) system is a new alternative Dynesys system that can be applied via a minimally invasive procedure. This study aimed to ascertain whether DTL is a suitable device for motion preservation and prevention of instability, and to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between DTL and Dynesys. In this study, 12 patients were treated with Dynesys and 21 patients were treated with DTL. Back and leg pain were evaluated using the visual analog scale. The Oswestry Disability Index was used to evaluate the patients' function. Range of motion (ROM) at the operative level and for the whole lumbar spine was measured pre- and postoperatively. The length of wound, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and operation duration were also compared. All patients were followed up for 12-76 months. Scores on the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly improved postoperatively. The median ROM of the whole spine and index level ROM in all patients showed 12.5% and 79.6% loss, respectively. The DTL group exhibited significantly better results in terms of blood loss, wound length, and operation duration, in addition to early ambulation. In conclusion, Dynesys and DTL are semirigid fixation systems that can significantly improve clinical symptoms and signs. Our results suggested that DTL was better than Dynesys as a result of it being a minimally invasive procedure. However, further study with large sample sizes and longer follow-up durations is required to validate the effects of these dynamic stabilizers.

摘要

Dynesys(动态中和系统)旨在克服融合术的缺点。Dynesys顶部加载(DTL)系统是一种新型的替代Dynesys系统,可通过微创手术应用。本研究旨在确定DTL是否是一种适用于保留运动和预防不稳定的装置,并比较DTL与Dynesys之间的临床和放射学结果。在本研究中,12例患者接受了Dynesys治疗,21例患者接受了DTL治疗。使用视觉模拟量表评估背部和腿部疼痛。采用Oswestry功能障碍指数评估患者的功能。术前和术后测量手术节段及整个腰椎的活动范围(ROM)。还比较了伤口长度、失血量、住院时间和手术持续时间。所有患者均随访12 - 76个月。术后视觉模拟量表评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数均显著改善。所有患者全脊柱ROM中位数和指数节段ROM分别减少了12.5%和79.6%。DTL组在失血量、伤口长度和手术持续时间方面表现出明显更好的结果,此外还能早期下床活动。总之,Dynesys和DTL是半刚性固定系统,可显著改善临床症状和体征。我们的结果表明,由于DTL是一种微创手术,其效果优于Dynesys。然而,需要进一步进行大样本量和更长随访时间的研究来验证这些动态稳定器的效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验