Rey Gozalo Guillermo, Barrigón Morillas Juan Miguel
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, 5 Poniente 1670, Talca 3460000, Chile.
Departamento de Física Aplicada, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, Cáceres 10003, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 11;13(5):490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050490.
Today, noise pollution is an increasing environmental stressor. Noise maps are recognised as the main tool for assessing and managing environmental noise, but their accuracy largely depends on the sampling method used. The sampling methods most commonly used by different researchers (grid, legislative road types and categorisation methods) were analysed and compared using the city of Talca (Chile) as a test case. The results show that the stratification of sound values in road categories has a significantly lower prediction error and a higher capacity for discrimination and prediction than in the legislative road types used by the Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications in Chile. Also, the use of one or another method implies significant differences in the assessment of population exposure to noise pollution. Thus, the selection of a suitable method for performing noise maps through measurements is essential to achieve an accurate assessment of the impact of noise pollution on the population.
如今,噪声污染是一个日益严重的环境压力源。噪声地图被认为是评估和管理环境噪声的主要工具,但其准确性在很大程度上取决于所使用的采样方法。以智利塔尔卡市为测试案例,对不同研究人员最常用的采样方法(网格法、法定道路类型法和分类法)进行了分析和比较。结果表明,与智利交通和电信部使用的法定道路类型相比,道路类别中声值的分层具有显著更低的预测误差以及更高的辨别和预测能力。此外,使用不同方法在评估人群暴露于噪声污染方面意味着显著差异。因此,选择一种合适的通过测量来制作噪声地图的方法对于准确评估噪声污染对人群的影响至关重要。