Pignon Baptiste, Schürhoff Franck, Baudin Grégoire, Ferchiou Aziz, Richard Jean-Romain, Saba Ghassen, Leboyer Marion, Kirkbride James B, Szöke Andrei
AP-HP, DHU PePSY, Hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor, Pôle de Psychiatrie, Créteil, 94000, France.
INSERM, U955, team 15, Créteil, 94000, France.
Sci Rep. 2016 May 18;6:26190. doi: 10.1038/srep26190.
Previous analyses of neighbourhood variations of non-affective psychotic disorders (NAPD) have focused mainly on incidence. However, prevalence studies provide important insights on factors associated with disease evolution as well as for healthcare resource allocation. This study aimed to investigate the distribution of prevalent NAPD cases in an urban area in France. The number of cases in each neighbourhood was modelled as a function of potential confounders and ecological variables, namely: migrant density, economic deprivation and social fragmentation. This was modelled using statistical models of increasing complexity: frequentist models (using Poisson and negative binomial regressions), and several Bayesian models. For each model, assumptions validity were checked and compared as to how this fitted to the data, in order to test for possible spatial variation in prevalence. Data showed significant overdispersion (invalidating the Poisson regression model) and residual autocorrelation (suggesting the need to use Bayesian models). The best Bayesian model was Leroux's model (i.e. a model with both strong correlation between neighbouring areas and weaker correlation between areas further apart), with economic deprivation as an explanatory variable (OR = 1.13, 95% CI [1.02-1.25]). In comparison with frequentist methods, the Bayesian model showed a better fit. The number of cases showed non-random spatial distribution and was linked to economic deprivation.
以往对非情感性精神障碍(NAPD)邻里差异的分析主要集中在发病率上。然而,患病率研究为与疾病演变相关的因素以及医疗资源分配提供了重要见解。本研究旨在调查法国一个城市地区NAPD现患病例的分布情况。将每个邻里的病例数建模为潜在混杂因素和生态变量的函数,即:移民密度、经济贫困和社会碎片化。使用复杂度不断增加的统计模型进行建模:频率主义模型(使用泊松回归和负二项回归)以及几种贝叶斯模型。对于每个模型,检查并比较假设的有效性及其与数据的拟合程度,以检验患病率可能存在的空间差异。数据显示存在显著的过度离散(使泊松回归模型无效)和残差自相关(表明需要使用贝叶斯模型)。最佳的贝叶斯模型是勒鲁模型(即相邻区域之间相关性强、相距较远区域之间相关性弱的模型),将经济贫困作为解释变量(比值比=1.13,95%置信区间[1.02 - 1.25])。与频率主义方法相比,贝叶斯模型显示出更好的拟合度。病例数呈现非随机的空间分布,且与经济贫困有关。