Kochupurakal Reema Thomas, Srikanth Krishnagopal, Jha Kirti Nath, Rajalakshmi A R, Nagarajan Swathi, Ezhumalai G
Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University , Pondicherry, India .
Professor and Head, Department of Ophthalmology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University , Pondicherry, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):NC18-20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17879.7701. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
Gonioscopy is the gold standard in assessing anterior chamber angles. However, interobserver variations are common and there is a need for reliable objective method of assessment.
To compare the anterior chamber angle by gonioscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) in individuals with shallow anterior chamber.
This comparative observational study was conducted in a rural tertiary multi-speciality teaching hospital. A total of 101 eyes of 54 patients with shallow anterior chamber on slit lamp evaluation were included. Anterior chamber angle was graded by gonioscopy using the shaffer grading system. Angles were also assessed by SD-OCT with Trabecular Iris Angle (TIA) and Angle Opening Distance (AOD). Chi-square test, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value to find correlation between OCT parameters and gonioscopy grading.
Females represented 72.7%. The mean age was 53.93 ±8.24 years and mean anterior chamber depth was 2.47 ± 0.152 mm. Shaffer grade ≤ 2 were identified in 95(94%) superior, 42(41.5%) inferior, 65(64.3%) nasal and 57(56.4%) temporal quadrants. Cut-off values of TIA ≤ 22° and AOD ≤ 290 μm were taken as narrow angles on SD-OCT. TIA of ≤ 22° were found in 88(92.6%) nasal and 87(87%) temporal angles. AOD of ≤ 290 μm was found in 73(76.8%) nasal and 83(83%) temporal quadrants. Sensitivity in detecting narrow angles was 90.7% and 82.2% for TIA and AOD, while specificity was 11.7% and 23.4%, respectively.
Individuals were found to have narrow angles more with SD-OCT. Sensitivity was high and specificity was low in detecting narrow angles compared to gonioscopy, making it an unreliable tool for screening.
前房角镜检查是评估前房角的金标准。然而,观察者间的差异很常见,因此需要可靠的客观评估方法。
比较浅前房患者通过前房角镜检查和光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)所测得的前房角情况。
本比较性观察研究在一家农村三级综合教学医院进行。纳入了54例经裂隙灯评估为浅前房患者的101只眼。使用Shaffer分级系统通过前房角镜检查对前房角进行分级。同时也通过SD-OCT测量小梁虹膜角(TIA)和房角开放距离(AOD)来评估房角。采用卡方检验、敏感度、特异度、阳性和阴性预测值来寻找OCT参数与前房角镜检查分级之间的相关性。
女性占72.7%。平均年龄为53.93±8.24岁,平均前房深度为2.47±0.152mm。在上方象限,95只眼(94%)的Shaffer分级≤2级;下方象限,42只眼(41.5%);鼻侧象限,65只眼(64.3%);颞侧象限,57只眼(56.4%)。SD-OCT上,将TIA≤22°和AOD≤290μm的截断值作为窄房角标准。鼻侧房角TIA≤22°的有88只眼(92.6%),颞侧房角有87只眼(87%)。鼻侧象限AOD≤290μm的有73只眼(76.8%),颞侧象限有83只眼(83%)。检测窄房角时,TIA和AOD的敏感度分别为90.7%和82.2%,而特异度分别为11.7%和23.4%。
发现SD-OCT显示窄房角的个体更多。与前房角镜检查相比,SD-OCT检测窄房角时敏感度高但特异度低,这使其成为一种不可靠的筛查工具。