Hurt Aeron C, Kelly Heath
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;22(6):949-55. doi: 10.3201/eid2206.151037.
A debate about the market-leading influenza antiviral medication, oseltamivir, which initially focused on treatment for generally mild illness, has been expanded to question the wisdom of stockpiling for use in future influenza pandemics. Although randomized controlled trial evidence confirms that oseltamivir will reduce symptom duration by 17-25 hours among otherwise healthy adolescents and adults with community-managed disease, no randomized controlled trials have examined the effectiveness of oseltamivir against more serious outcomes. Observational studies, although criticized on methodologic grounds, suggest that oseltamivir given early can reduce the risk for death by half among persons hospitalized with confirmed infection caused by influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza A(H5N1) viruses. However, available randomized controlled trial data may not be able to capture the effect of oseltamivir use among hospitalized patients with severe disease. We assert that data on outpatients with relatively mild disease should not form the basis for policies on the management of more severe disease.
一场关于市场领先的流感抗病毒药物奥司他韦的争论,最初聚焦于一般轻症的治疗,现已扩展到质疑储备该药用于未来流感大流行的合理性。尽管随机对照试验证据证实,在社区管理疾病的健康青少年和成年人中,奥司他韦可将症状持续时间缩短17 - 25小时,但尚无随机对照试验研究奥司他韦对更严重后果的有效性。观察性研究虽因方法学问题受到批评,但表明早期使用奥司他韦可使因甲型H1N1pdm09流感病毒和甲型H5N1流感病毒确诊感染而住院的患者死亡风险减半。然而,现有的随机对照试验数据可能无法体现奥司他韦在重症住院患者中的使用效果。我们认为,相对轻症门诊患者的数据不应成为更严重疾病管理政策的依据。