Suppr超能文献

用于可视化患者体内铁负载疝修补网片植入物的阳性对比MRI技术

Positive Contrast MRI Techniques for Visualization of Iron-Loaded Hernia Mesh Implants in Patients.

作者信息

Ciritsis Alexander, Truhn Daniel, Hansen Nienke L, Otto Jens, Kuhl Christiane K, Kraemer Nils A

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155717. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

OBJECT

In MRI, implants and devices can be delineated via susceptibility artefacts. To discriminate susceptibility voids from proton-free structures, different positive contrast techniques were implemented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pulse sequence-based positive contrast technique (PCSI) and a post-processing susceptibility gradient mapping algorithm (SGM) for visualization of iron loaded mesh implants in patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five patients with iron-loaded MR-visible inguinal hernia mesh implants were examined at 1.5 Tesla. A gradient echo sequence (GRE; parameters: TR: 8.3ms; TE: 4.3ms; NSA:2; FA:20°; FOV:350mm²) and a PCSI sequence (parameters: TR: 25ms; TE: 4.6ms; NSA:4; FA:20°; FOV:350mm²) with on-resonant proton suppression were performed. SGM maps were calculated using two algorithms. Image quality and mesh delineation were independently evaluated by three radiologists.

RESULTS

On GRE, the iron-loaded meshes generated distinct susceptibility-induced signal voids. PCSI exhibited susceptibility differences including the meshes as hyperintense signals. SGM exhibited susceptibility differences with positive contrast. Visually, the different algorithms presented no significant differences. Overall, the diagnostic value was rated best in GRE whereas PCSI and SGM were barely "sufficient".

CONCLUSION

Both "positive contrast" techniques depicted implanted meshes with hyperintense signal. SGM comes without additional acquisition time and can therefore be utilized in every patient.

摘要

目的

在磁共振成像(MRI)中,植入物和器械可通过磁化率伪影来描绘。为了区分磁化率空洞与无质子结构,实施了不同的阳性对比技术。本研究的目的是评估一种基于脉冲序列的阳性对比技术(PCSI)和一种后处理磁化率梯度映射算法(SGM),用于可视化患者体内铁负载的网状植入物。

材料与方法

对5例铁负载且在MR下可见的腹股沟疝网状植入物患者在1.5特斯拉磁场下进行检查。采用梯度回波序列(GRE;参数:TR:8.3毫秒;TE:4.3毫秒;激励次数:2;翻转角:20°;视野:350平方毫米)和具有共振质子抑制的PCSI序列(参数:TR:25毫秒;TE:4.6毫秒;激励次数:4;翻转角:20°;视野:350平方毫米)。使用两种算法计算SGM图。由三名放射科医生独立评估图像质量和网状物描绘情况。

结果

在GRE序列上,铁负载的网状物产生明显的磁化率诱导信号空洞。PCSI显示出磁化率差异,网状物为高信号。SGM显示出具有阳性对比的磁化率差异。直观上,不同算法之间无显著差异。总体而言,GRE序列的诊断价值被评为最佳,而PCSI和SGM勉强“足够”。

结论

两种“阳性对比”技术均以高信号描绘植入的网状物。SGM无需额外采集时间,因此可用于每位患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b376/4871409/e0c9c5a8798f/pone.0155717.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验